Cincinnati, Ohio, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1956(h), which provides:

(h) Any person who conspires to commit any offense defined in this section or section 1957 shall be subject to the same penalties as those prescribed for the offense the commission of which was the object of the conspirac

Columbus, Ohio criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with interference with commerce by threat or violence.

AI Overview Federal interference with commerce by threats or violence, most notably under the Hobbs Act (\(18\) U.S.C. \(1951\)), makes it illegal to obstruct, delay, or affect interstate or foreign commerce through robbery or extortion. This includes committ

Detroit, Michigan, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to defraud the United States.

Waco, Texas, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribut and to distribute heroin, a Schedule 1 controlled substance (drug).

Dallas, Texas, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute a mixture and substance containing a detectable amount of methamphetamine.

Allentown, Pennsylvania criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with attempted homicide and conspiracy to do the same.

On December 29, 2023, members of the Allentown Police Department were around the area of the Sportsmen's Bar for an investigation in an unrelated case when they heard shots fired. They pursued a fleeing individual, later identified as Appellant. Once of

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to distribute controlled substance (drugs).

In 2023, Carey filed a petition for writ of error coram nobis. In that petition, Carey again argued that he was entitled to relief because the District Court lacked jurisdiction to convict him on Count II as he was a juvenile during dates listed i

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiring and attempting to engage in and engaging in transactions regarding sanctioned Iranian oil, in violation of 50 U.S.C. §§ 1701-1707 (the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA)) and 18 U.S.C. § 371, and for money laundering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h).

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant seeking compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i).

In 2009, after a jury trial in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, Dupree was convicted of armed bank robbery, use of a firearm during a crime of violence, and conspiracy to commit robbery. The District Court s

Williamsport, Pennsylvania, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to distribute drugs.

On July 25, 2019, after a nonjury trial, Judge Conner of the Middle District of Pennsylvania found Piaquadio guilty of one count of conspiracy to distribute Oxycodone, fentanyl, and heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and three counts of possession with intent to

Boston, Massachusetts, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with, conspiracy to distribut and posses with intent to distribute cocaine, fentanyl, methamphetamine and other controlled substance.

Mobile, Alabama, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute fentanyl and methamphetamine. See 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 841(b)(1)(A), and

Miami, Florida, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act (“MDLEA.”

In 2022, the United States Coast Guard stopped the
appellants’ go-fast vessel within the waters of the Dominican
Republic’s EEZ. The vessel displayed no indicia of nationality.
The appellants refused to answer questions, and, therefore, no one

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud.

Topeka, Kansas, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Conspiracy to Commit Bank Fraud and Wire Fraud and Money Laundering.

A jury convicted Defendant Montressa Cunningham (“Cunningham”) of sixteen offenses stemming from a fourteen-month fraudulent scheme. Cunningham and his wife Felicia purchased seven higher-end used cars, financing those purchases
with b

Denver, Colorado, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute 40 grams or more of fentanyl.

San Diego, California, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to distributer Oxycodon and Carfentanil.

San Jose, California criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to distribute \schedule II controlled substances and attempted importation of Tapentadol.

Bismarck, North Dakota, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute controlled substances (Count One), and one count of possession with intent to distribute 40 grams or more of fentanyl (Count Two).

On October 17, 2020, officers executed a search warrant in Bismarck, North Dakota, following a multi-agency i

Claremore, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer Keaton taylor represented the Defendant charged with:

ount # 2.
Count as Filed: ODO, CONSPIRACY TO DISTRIBUTE CDS, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-408
Date of Offense: 05/05/2020
Diggs, J

Count # 3.
Count as Filed: TAXS,

Dayton, Ohio, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Conspiracy to commit theft and conversion of money and things of value from the United States; 18 U.S.C. § 1014 - Making false statements on a loan application; 18 U.S.C. § 1040 - Wire Fraud; 18 U.S.C. § 1343 - the knowing transfer, possession and use without lawful authority of a means of identification of another per

Brooklyn, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with wire fraud conspiracy, wire fraud, investment advisor fraud, and money laundering conspiracy.

The defendants are accused of overcharging clients for advisory fees and fraudulently charging client credit cards and bank accounts for unauthorized investments or fees.

The Government claimed that the de

Anderson, South Carolina, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to possess stolen mail, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 513, 1708.

New Haven, Connecticut, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to distribute drugs.

Google A.I.:

Federal conspiracy to distribute controlled substances is a serious criminal charge under
21 U.S.C. § 846 that targets an agreement between two or more individuals to violate federal drug laws, such as manufacturing or distributing illegal drugs

Providence, Rhode Island, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit bank fraud.