| Constitutional Law Law |
| |
|
Yvondia Johnson v. Bexar Appraisal District
|
San Antonio, Texas - Real Estate lawyer represented Appellant with arguing she was entitled to a homestead exemption on the total appraised value.
The facts of this case are extraordinary. Both Johnson and her husband, Gregory Johnson
(“Gregory”), served in the United States Air Force. The... More... $0 (05-24-2022 - TX)
|
|
Charlene Leatherman et al. v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination Unit
|
Washington, DC - Criminal Defense lawyer represented petitioners with violations of the Fourth Amendment.
We review here a decision granting a motion to dismiss, and therefore must accept as true all the factual allegations in the complaint. See United States v. Gaubert, 499 U.S. ----, ----, ... More... $0 (05-23-2022 - TX)
|
|
Heather J. McVey v. Atlanticare Medical System, Inc., et al.
|
|
Trenton, New Jersey civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued defendant claiming her constitutional rights were violated by Defendant.
The issue raised by the Plaintiff is whether the First Amendment or Article I, Paragraph 6 of the New Jersey Constitution prevents a private employer from terminating one of its at-will employees for posting racially insensitive comments abo... More... $0 (05-20-2022 - NJ)
|
|
Diane N. Resnick, et al. v. Kruchcash, LLC, et al.
|
|
West Palm Beach, Florida civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued defendants under 42 U.S.C. 1983 claiming that their constitutional rights were violated by Defendants.
Plaintiffs claim that Defendants violated their right to due process of law by freezing their assets in Maryland, obtaining writs of garnishment based on Maryland law without providing notice and an oppor... More... $0 (05-20-2022 - FL)
|
|
Thomas Olivas v. The State of Texas
|
Fort Worth, Texas - Criminal Defense lawyer represented defendant with a capital murder charge.
Our 2016 opinion thoroughly details the testimony presented and evidence
admitted during the two-week trial. Olivas, 507 S.W.3d at 449–69. We will focus on
those facts which are particularly... More... $0 (05-20-2022 - TX)
|
|
Michael Harvey Deharde v. The State of Texas
|
Fort Worth, Texas - Criminal Defense lawyer represented defendant with a possession of a controlled substance charge.
Officer Braucht with the North Richland Hills Police Department testified that
on December 2, 2017, he had responded to 6723 Manor Drive based on a call that “a
couple ... More... $0 (05-19-2022 - TX)
|
|
James Miller v. Heather Schupp
|
Fort Worth, Texas - Divorce lawyer represented Appellant with a defamation case.
Miller sued Schupp for defamation after she made allegedly defamatory
statements about him to his sister and to a friend. Miller claims that in September or
October 2020, Schupp contacted Miller’s sister a... More... $0 (05-17-2022 - TX)
|
|
Sydney Raym f/k/a Sydney Dethloff v. Tupelo Management, LLC
|
Fort Worth, Texas - Real Estate lawyer represented Appellant with appealing from a summary judgment from a joint venture to flip a house.
In late 2018, Raym and Tupelo entered a joint venture to flip a house. Tupelo
would provide the funds to acquire and renovate the property, and Raym promis... More... $0 (05-17-2022 - TX)
|
|
Maged Gabra v. Viola Gabra
|
Houston, Texas - Divorce lawyer represented appellant with appealing from the trial court’s divorce decree.
Appellee, Viola Gabra, and Maged married in 2009 and have three children,
A.G., C.G., and T.G. After moving with her children from California to Texas for
a job, Viola filed for di... More... $0 (05-16-2022 - TX)
|
|
Edmond Baker, Jr. v. The State of Texas
|
Houston, Texas - Criminal Defense lawyer represented defendant with a stalking charge and contending the charge was fundamentally erroneous
Because appellant does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to
support his conviction for stalking, we provide only a brief recitation of ... More... $0 (05-15-2022 - TX)
|
|
Ronald Joseph v. Britini Jeavon Jack
|
Houston, Texas - Divorce lawyer represented appellee with a protective order and temporary protective order case.
In February 2018, Jack, represented by the Harris County District Attorney’s
Office, filed an application for a protective order and temporary protective order
against Jose... More... $0 (05-14-2022 - TX)
|
|
Roberto Amaya Pacas v. The State of Texas
|
Houston, Texas - Criminal Defense lawyer represented defendant with arguing that his convictions should be vacated because the charges were not tried by a jury.
Roberto Amaya Pacas pled guilty to three charges of felony assault.1 The trial
court accepted his pleas, found him guilty of all thr... More... $0 (05-14-2022 - TX)
|
|
Victor Juzumas v. Nassau County, New York
|
|
Brooklyn, New York civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant claiming it violated his constitutional rights.
Victor Juzumas sued Nassau County (the “County”) and five “John Doe”
law enforcement officers (the County and the individuals together, “Defendants”)
for alleged constitutional violations arising from their enforcement of New York
Penal L... More... $0 (05-12-2022 - NY)
|
|
n re: ROBERT SZCZYPORSKI; BONNIE SZCZYPORSKI
|
|
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania bankruptcy lawyer represented Debtor in a Chapter 13 proceeding.
The ACA requires certain individuals to maintain
“minimal essential [health insurance] coverage” throughout
the year (the Individual Mandate). 26 U.S.C. § 5000A(a). A
person subject to the Individual Mandate who fails to maintain
the required insurance for one month or more is ... More... $0 (05-11-2022 - PA)
|
|
Matthew Jones, et al. v. Rob Bonta, et al.
|
|
Los Angeles, California Constitutional law lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on civil rights violation theories.
"California has restricted the sale of most firearms to
anyone under 21. Plaintiffs challenged the bans on long
guns and semiautomatic centerfire rifles under the Second
Amendment. The district court declined to issue a
preliminary injunction.More... $0 (05-11-2022 - CA)
|
|
Rae'quan Xavier Dandridge v. Commonwealth of Virginia
|
Richmond, Virginia - Criminal Defense lawyer represented defendant with a arguing on appeal that the trial court erred in refusing a offense of voluntary manslaughter.
“Usually, this Court ‘review[s] the evidence in the light most favorable to the
Commonwealth, the prevailing party in th... More... $0 (05-10-2022 - VA)
|
|
Shaka Markel Long v. Commonwealth of Virginia
|
Richmond, Virginia - Criminal Defense lawyer represented appellant with appealing a denial of his motion to suppress.
“In accordance with established principles of appellate review, we view the ‘evidence in the
light most favorable to the Commonwealth, as we must since it was the prevail... More... $0 (05-09-2022 - VA)
|
|
Clyde Carleton Koons, IV, f/k/a Clyde Carleton Crane, IV v. Leslie Elizabeth Crane
|
Richmond, Virginia - Divorce lawyer represented appellant with appealing an order finding him in contempt.
Husband and Leslie Elizabeth Crane (“wife”) were married in 2002 and divorced by final
decree entered in April 2016. The divorce decree incorporated the parties’ property settleme... More... $0 (05-09-2022 - V0)
|
|
Ira Lee Wilkins v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma, et al.
|
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on civil rights violation theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983 claiming that officers Will Mortenson, Angela Emberton and Edel Rangel used excessive force when they ordered him out of his car, and eventually forced him to the ground, where they pepper sprayed him.
Mr. Wilkins sued the officers under 42 U.S.C. § 19... More... $0 (05-04-2022 - OK)
|
|
Christopher Anderson; James "J.J." Hatmaker v. City of Jellico, Tennessee
|
|
Knoxville, Tennessee civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiffs-Appellants, who sued Defendant on a Amendment Violation theory.
The First Amendment does not “constitutionalize the employee
grievance.” Connick v. Myers, 461 U.S. 138, 154 (1983). But that is what police officers
Christopher Anderson and J.J. Hatmaker seek, asking us to second-guess the city’s decision to fi... More... $0 (05-02-2022 - TN)
|
|
Courthouse News Service, et al. v. Amy Quinlan
|
|
Portland, Maine constitutional law lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on a First Amendment violation theory seeking injunctive relief.
When the Maine Supreme Judicial
Court (SJC) piloted an electronic case filing system for the
state's trial courts, its original rules required court clerks to
withhold public access to new civil complaints until three businessMore... $0 (05-02-2022 - ME)
|
|
STATE OF OHIO v. NATHAN STRAWSBURG
|
Dayton, Ohio - Criminal Defense lawyer represented defendant with appealing from his conviction and sentence.
The record reflects that police stopped Strawsburg for a traffic violation.
During the stop, he was found to have a suspended license. An inventory search of his
car resu... More... $0 (04-27-2022 - OH)
|
|
STATE OF OHIO v. DWIGHT N. TILLMAN
|
Dayton, Ohio - Criminal Defense lawyer represented defendant with appealing from his conviction for one count of aggravated possession of drugs.
In the early morning hours of February 24, 2017, an officer with the Kettering
Police Department, on routine patrol along Shroyer Road, p... More... $0 (04-27-2022 - OH)
|
|
Kareem M. Murray v. Joseph H. Noeth
|
|
Albany, New York criminal defense lawyer represent Plaintiff, who sued defendant seeking a writ of habeas corpus.
Petitioner-Appellant Kareem Murray was convicted of second-
degree murder and other offenses in New York state court. During
jury selection, Murray’s lawyer exercised peremptory strikes against
two male jurors, but the prosecutor raised a “reverse-Batson”More... $0 (04-26-2022 - NY)
|
|
STATE OF OHIO v. JOSHUA VERDELL
|
Dayton, Ohio - Criminal Defense lawyer represented defendant with a appeals from his conviction to murder, felony murder, felonious assault, tampering with evidence charges.
On December 29, 2016, the Montgomery County Grand Jury returned an
indictment charging Verdell with one count of murder,... More... $0 (04-26-2022 - oh)
|
Next Page
|