| State of Nevada v. Tiktok, Inc., et al. |
|
Las Vegas, Nevada commercial litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiffs seeking a writ of prohibition or, alternatively, mandamus challenging a district court order denying a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim in a consumer protection action. |
| United States of America v. Kirill Afanasyev |
|
San Francisco, California, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit mail fraud. |
| United States of America v. James L. Hattten, II |
|
Omaha, Nebraska, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with sex trafficking a minor in violation of 18 U.S. 1591. |
| United States of America v. Nicholas G. Brown |
|
Omaha, Nebraska, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with wire fraud. $0 (11-07-2025 - NE) |
| United States of America v. Corey Ray Fields |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud. |
| United States of America v. Matthew Ramos-Soto |
|
Madison, Wisconsin, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, see 18 |
| United States of America v. Charles “Chuck” Wright, Amos Durham, Lawson B. Watson |
|
Spartanburg, South Carolina criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with conspiracy to commit theft. |
| State of Colorado v. John Hallford and Carie Hallford |
|
Colorado Springs, Colorado criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with fraud. |
| United States of America v. C.R. Kraus, a/k/a Christopher Kraus |
|
Newark, New Jersey, riminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with healthcare fraud, conspiracy to commit the same, and tax evasion. |
| United States of America v. |
|
Wilmington, Delaware criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with stealing checks out of the mail. |
| Christopher B. Norman v. Tranam Systems International, Inc. and Masaru Brook Iwata |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a fraud theory. |
| State of Oklahoma v. Rodney Charles Clifton and Joshua Gregory Frank |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with: |
| United States of America v. Tania Cesar |
|
Miami, Florida, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit health care fraud and wire fraud and 5 counts of health care fraud. |
| United States of America v. Clonet Junior Charmant |
|
Tallahassee, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with attempt and conspiracy to commit fail fraud and bank fraud. |
| United States of America v. Sharon Toney‑Finch a |
|
New York, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Wire Fraud And Stolen Valor. |
| United States of America v. Byron Cordell Thomas |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with two counts of sex |
| United States of America v. Kelly Ballinger |
|
Portland, Maine criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with embezzling from an organization receiving federal funds and conspiring to alter money orders. |
| United States of America v. Jonathan Tylor Herra |
|
Anchorage, Alaska, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with sexual exploitation of a child and possession and access with intent to view child pornography. |
| United States of America v. SGO Corporation Limited |
|
Miami, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Philippine Bribery and Money Laundering. |
| Brey Mafi v. Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc., et al. |
|
Minneapolis, Minnesota, personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a real property fraud claim. |
| Tanisha Burress v. Western Avenue Nissan, Inc. |
|
Chicago, Illinois personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Racketeering (RICO) Act violation toery. |
| Nasim Ghebart v. Nationwide Credit and Collection, Inc. |
|
Chicago, Illinois, consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment Act violation. |
| United States of America v. Robert Elwood Matthews |
|
Columbus, Ohio, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance. |
| United States of America v. Bahadar Durrant |
|
Columbus, Ohio, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to defraud the United States. |
| United States of America v. Lionell Coleman |
|
Cincinnati, Ohio, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to distribute drugs. |
|
Next Page |