Memphis, Tennessee Bank Fraud Lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Bank Fraud and Identity Theft

Louisville, Kentucky Fraud Lawyer represented the Defendant for CARES Act Fraud

OXFORD, MS Criminal Defense Lawyer represented the Defendant a Former Elementary School Principal for the Attempted Production of Child Sexual Abuse Material

Del Rio Criminal Defense Lawyer represented the Defendant, A Honduran National for Assaulting Customs and Border Protection Officer

El Paso, Texas Wire fraud Lawyer represented the Defendant convicted of Health Insurance Fraud

Del Rio, Texas Criminal Defense Lawyer represented the Defendant Indicted for Alleged Smuggling Attempt of 187 Firearms into Mexico

Del Rio, Texas Criminal Defense Lawyer represented a Del Rio Man Sentenced for Coaxing Sexually Explicit Material from Minors on Social Medias

Honolulu, Hawaii personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Hawaii Auto Negligence Law:

Comparative Negligence (51% Rule):

Hawaii follows a modified comparative negligence system with a 51% rule.
This means a plaintiff can s

Honolulu, Hawaii personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Clims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the failure to exercise due care by a federal government employee.

Hawaii Auto Negligence Law:

"Duty of Care: All drivers in Hawaii have a duty to operate their

Seattle, Washington personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on motor vehicle product liability theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Motor vehicle product liability law protects consumers from injuries caused by defective or malfunctioning vehicles and their components. It's a complex area of law with various fact

Sacramento, California consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued
the Defendant on a Magnuson -Moss Warranty Act violation theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages.

The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act is a federal law that regulates consumer product warranties in the United States. Here's a breakdown of its key elements:

Purpose:

To e

Newark, New Jersey criminal defense lawyer represented Sussex County Man Charged in $2 Million COVID-19 Fraud Scheme

New York City, New York criminal defense lawyer represented New York and Delaware Companies from Manufacturing and Distributing Adulterated and Misbranded Dietary Supplements

Dallas, Texas qui tam lawyer represented the relator claiming that Defendant violated the t Indicted on PPP False Claims Act.

Lubbock, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant Indicted for Concealing PPP Loan Fraud

New York City, New York consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the defedants on a Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act theory.


Defendant B&G “manufactures, markets, and sells” spreads, jams, preserves, marmalades, and jellies under its Polaner brand. At issue in this case are statements on the packaging of Polaner's “All Fruit spreadable fruit” (the “Product”). The

New York City, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on product liability theories.

Defendants manufacture and sell POM Wonderful® 100% Pomegranate Juice drink (“the Product”) at mass market retailers and grocery stores throughout the United States. Doc. 24 (First Amended Class Action Complaint (“FAC”) ¶¶ 4, 22. Hernandez alleges that

San Diego, California personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory claiming more than $75,000 in damages and injuries as a direct result of a dangerous condition in a Wal-Mart store.

"California premises liability law revolves around the concept of the duty of care property owners owe to visitors. Here's a breakdown of k

San Diego, California personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Superior Court, San Diego County, CA, 37-02023-00035558-CU-PO-NC, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

"California premises liability law revolves around the concept of the duty of care property owners o

Fargo, North Dakota personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an uninsured motorist insurance theory.

"North Dakota requires all registered and operated vehicles within the state to carry certain minimum insurance coverages, including uninsured motorist (UM) insurance. Here's an overview of North Dakota's UM insurance law:

Key provisions:

Cedar Rapids, Iowa criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with bankruptcy fraud.

Leisinger admitted that, on December 8, 2022, she filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa, by means of sworn court filings. When a debtor files a petition seeking protection from creditors under the bankruptcy laws, a “bankrupt

Burlington, Vermont criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant for assaulting a federal agent and brandishing a firearm during the assault

Tulsa, Oklahoma consumer credit lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a Fair Debt Collection Act violation under 15 U.S.C. 1692, which provides:

§1692g. Validation of debts
(a) Notice of debt; contents

Within five days after the initial communication with a consumer in connection with the collection of any debt, a debt collector shall, unless the follow

Tulsa, Oklahoma consumer credit lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on Fair Credit Reporting Act violation theories under 15 U.S.C. 1961, which provides:

(a) Accuracy and fairness of credit reportingThe Congress makes the following findings:
(1) The banking system is dependent upon fair and accurate credit reporting. Inaccurate credit reports directly impair the

Tulsa, Oklahoma consumer credit lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant Fair Credit Reporting Act under 15 U.S.C. 1681, which provides:

(a) Accuracy and fairness of credit reportingThe Congress makes the following findings:
(1) The banking system is dependent upon fair and accurate credit reporting. Inaccurate credit reports directly impair the efficiency of the bank