United States of America v. Isaac Lamont Dawson |
Raleigh, North Carolina criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with fraudulently obtaining Paycheck Protection Act (“PPP”) COVID-19 loans on behalf of two separate businesses he owned. |
Thomas Richard Devane v. Trans Union, LLC and Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania consumer credit lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on Fair Credit Reporting Act violation theories. |
Sanjeev Kaul, M.D., FACS, LLC v. Horizon Blue Shield of New Jersey, Inc. |
Newark, New Jersey employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on an E.R.I.S.A. law theory. |
Louis Garcia v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. |
Trenton, New Jersey consumer credit lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on Fair Credit Reporting Act violation theories. |
Andrew Perrong v. Gacovina, Lake & Associates, et al. |
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania consumer law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (47 U.S.C. 227). |
Kytt MacManus, et al. v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., et al. |
White Plains, New York consumer credit lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on Fair Credit Reporting Act violation theories. |
Leann Gentry v. Solco Healthcare U.S., LLC, et al. |
Kansas City, Kansas personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on product liability theories. |
Glenn R. Simmons v. Joe Allbaugh |
Petitioner, Glynn R. Simmons, is an Oklahoma state prisoner appearing pro se in this matter. However, at the time the Petition was filed and through the filing of his Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Petitioner appeared through counsel, Rand Eddy. The Court granted Mr. Eddy leave to withdraw his appearance after the Objection was filed. See Order [Doc. No. 28] (J. Mil $0 (07-23-2019 - OK) |
Kiyee Kye v. City of New York, et al. |
New York City, New York civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants claiming his civil rights were violated by the Defendants. |
John William Scharnhorst, III v. Allen et al. |
Fayetteville, Arkansas pro se Plaintiff without a lawyer sued Defendants on prisoner civil rights violation theories. |
Shelly Smith v. Trueaccord Corp. |
Valdosta, Georgia consumer credit lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a Fair Debt Collection Act violation theory under 15 U.S.C. 1692, et seq., which provides: |
Brittany Kokenzie v. Trueaccord Corp. |
Columbus, Georgia consumer credit lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Fair Debt Collection Act violation theory under 15 U.S.C. 1692. |
Erica Adams v. Von Maur Stores, Inc., et al. |
Albany, Georgia consumer credit lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on Fair Credit Reports Act violation theories under 15 U.S.C. 1681, et seq, which provides in part: |
Jason D. Squires v. UHG 1, LLC, et al. |
Wichita, Kansas consumer credit lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a Fair Credit Report Act violation theory. |
United States of America v. Jared Piepkorn |
Albuquerque, New Mexico criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with for selling wildlife taken in violation of state law, a Lacey Act violation. |
United States of America v. Crystal A. Huang |
Salt Lake City, Utah criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with securities fraud. |
United States of America v. Wayne Hinze |
Anchorage, Alaska criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with failing to register as a sex offender. |
Chase Toulou v. Chippewa Resources Incorporated |
Minot, North Dakota employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Fair Labor Standards Act violation theory under 29 U.S.C. 206, et seq., which provide: |
Norman Danielewicz v. Flagship Bank Minnesota, N.A. |
Minneapolis, Minnesota consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a breach of fiduciary duty theory. |
David Thompson v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
Minneapolis, Minnesota consumer lawyer lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a Electronic Fund Transfer Act (15 U.S.C. 1693), which provides: |
United States of America v. Nathan Martin Curry-Fishtorn |
Hot Springs, Arkansas criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with interstate violation of a protective order in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2262(a)(1) and (b)(3) and transportation of material involving the sexual exploitation of a minor in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2252A(a)(1) and (b)(1). |
United States of America v. Kendall A. Mack, Rasheem McCree and Adrian Lamont Morris |
Peoria, Illinois criminal defense lawyers represented Defendants charged with making false statements related to the federal Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). |
United States of America v. View, Inc. |
Oxford, Mississippi criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with discharging wastewater into a Publicly Owned Treatment Works without obtaining a valid state permit. |
Stephanie M.C. v. Social Security Administration |
Huntsville, Alabama social security disability lawyer represented Plaintiff seeking review of the denial of her application for Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI benefits by HHS. |
United States of America v. Maurice Lawson |
Atlanta, Georgia criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with obtaining nearly a half a million dollars by submitting multiple fraudulent Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) and Economic Injury Disaster Loan (“EIDL”) applications. |
Next Page |