United States of America v. Tyjuan Lighthall |
Chicago, Illinois criminal lawyer represented Defendant charged with illegally possessing a loaded handgun in Chicago and fraudulently obtaining a small business loan under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (“CARES”) Act. |
United States of America v. Mary Cheatham |
Detroit, Michigan criminal lawyer represented Defendant charged with tampering with vials and syringes of liquid painkiller at the Detroit hospital where she worked. |
United States of America v. Janola Massaquoi |
Shreveport, Louisiana criminal lawyer represented Defendant charged with making false statements to a federal agency. |
United States of America v. Raissa Kaossele, Damilola Ojo, Victor Ojo and Jamelia Thompson |
Baltimore, Maryland criminal lawyer represented Defendant charged with fraud based on a business email compromise scheme ("BEC scheme"). |
United States of America v. Kenneth Gaughan |
Washington, District of Columbia criminal lawyer represented Defendant charged with wire fraud, bank fraud, and money laundering. |
United States of America v. John F. Cochcroft |
Abingdon, Virginia criminal lawyer represented Defendant charged with misbranding a drug and trafficking anabolic steroids. |
United States of America v. The New York State Environmental Facilities Corporation |
Albany, New York civil Litigation lawyer represented Defendant charged with filing false reports. |
United States of America v. Diesel Ops, LLC and Orion Diesel, LLC |
Detroit, Michigan civil litigation lawyers represented Defendant accused of manufacturing, selling and installing aftermarket parts known as "defeat devices" designed to disable or bypass vehicle emission controls on motor vehicles. |
Nathan D. Richter v. Tracy Nelson, et al. |
Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on violation of the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourth Amendment. |
United States of America v. Timothy Ingram aka “Bleezy" and Joaquin Lopez |
San Diego, California criminal lawyer represented Defendant charged with "grandparent scam" fraud. |
State of Florida v. Gary Dewayne Hardley |
Pensacola, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with committing incest. |
United States of America v. Shakeena Hamilton |
Savannah, Georgia criminal lawyer represented Defendant charged with participating in a scheme to fraudulently obtain millions of dollars in COVID-19 relief funds. |
United States of America v. Timothy Dale Warren |
Wichita, Kansas criminal lawyer represented Defendant indicted by a federal grand jury in Wichita indicted a Kansas man on multiple charges for alleged crimes related to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, which is a federal law providing financial relief to businesses suffering economic losses because of the COVIID-19 pandemic. Under the CARES Act, the Small Business $0 (08-19-2022 - KS) |
United States of America v. John F. Cochcroft |
Abingdon, Virginia criminal lawyer represented Defendant charged with manufacturing and shipping unapproved drugs and anabolic steroids. |
Kari Lake, et al. v. Katie Hobbs, et al. |
Phoenix, Arizona civil litigation lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on civil rights violation theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983. |
In re Facebook, Inc., Consumer Privacy User Profile Litigation |
San Francisco, California class action consumer law lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on negligence theories claiming that they failed to exercise due care in safeguarding personal information collected by Facebook about its users claiming damages of $500 million. |
United States of America v. Chaz Duane Shields |
Detroit, Michigan criminal lawyer represented Defendant charged with wire and mail fraud. |
Walter E. Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc. |
¶1 Pursuant to the Uniform Certification of Questions of Law Act, 20 O.S. 1981 §§ 1601 et seq., the United States District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma certified for this court's answer the following question: |
Waggoner v. Town & Country Mobile Homes, Inc. |
¶1 This appeal presents an issue of first impression. Did the trial court err by instructing the jury on manufacturers' products liability when a design defect caused only deterioration in the product itself resulting in purely economic loss? We answer in the affirmative and hold that such a claim must be pursued as a warranty action. |
Debra R. Thompson v. State of Delaware Department of Services for Children, et al. |
Wilmington, Delaware civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violations of her right to due process and under state law against the State of Delaware Department of Services for Children, Youth and their Families (“DSCYF”) and several individual defendants after Thompson was demoted and eventually terminated from DSCYF. The District Court dism $0 (08-22-2022 - DE) |
United States of America v. Craig C. Franck |
Bangor, Maine criminal lawyer represented Defendant charged with wire fraud and money laundering charges stemming from his fraudulent receipt of Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) and Paycheck Protection Plan (PPP) funds. |
United States of America v. Moazu Kromah, a/k/a "Ayoub," a/k/a "Ayuba," a/k/a "Kampala Man" |
New York City, New York criminal lawyer represented Defendant charged with conspiring to traffic in millions of dollars in rhinoceros horns and elephant ivory, both endangered wildlife species, which involved the illegal poaching of more than approximately 35 rhinoceros and more than 100 elephants. |
United States of America v. Tory Lenard Troup |
Atlanta, Georgia criminal lawyer represented Defendant charged with drug trafficking. |
United States of America v. Sharon Elizabeth Keegan |
Savannah, Georgia criminal lawyer represented Defendant charged with producing child pornography. |
Edward Rood v. Town of Ft. Myers Beach Florida |
Fort Meyers, Florida personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on an Americans with Disabilities Act violation theory. |
Next Page |