United States of America v. Paul R. Gunter |
The United States of America charged Paul R. Gunter, age 64, with conspiracy to defraud the United States, frauds and swindles, fraud by wire, radio or television, attempted and conspiracy to commit mail raud, fraud by wire, radio or television, money laundering, postal, interstate wire, radio, etc., in interstate commerce in violation 18 U.S.C. 1341.F, 18 U.S.C. 1343.F, 18 U.S.C. 1348.F, 18 U.S.C $0 (04-19-2013 - FL) |
Tarla Makaeff v. Trump University, LLC |
No one would deny that Donald Trump, the real estate magnate, television personality, author, and erstwhile presidential candidate, cuts a celebrated, if controversial, public figure. We must decide whether Trump University, LLC, a private, for-profit entity purporting to teach Trump’s “insider success secrets,” is itself a public or limited public figure so as to implicate the First Amendme $0 (04-18-2013 - CA) |
Anthony Spinner v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc. |
Anthony Spinner brings this “idea submission” lawsuit against American Broadcasting Company, Inc. (ABC) for ABC‟s alleged use of his ideas in creating and developing the hit television series LOST. Spinner submitted a script entitled “L.O.S.T.” to ABC in 1977, while ABC‟s LOST was created and developed in 2003 and 2004. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of ABC. We affir $0 (04-05-2013 - CA) |
Lisa Williamson v. Mark C. Curran, Jr. |
Lisa Williamson was arrested along with her husband Lance on a charge that they had stolen someone else’s horse. After being acquitted on the charge, Williamson filed suit against two Lake County, Illinois sheriff’s deputies pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that they arrested her without probable cause in violation of the Fourth Amendment and de2 |
WNET v. Aereo, Inc. |
2 Aereo, Inc. (“Aereo”) enables its subscribers to watch broadcast television programs over |
Klein-Becker USA, LLC v. Patrick Englert d/b/a Mr. Finest Supplements |
Klein-Becker USA and Klein-Becker IP Holdings (collectively “Klein-Becker”) |
Kirtsaeng dba Bluechristine99 v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
The “exclusive rights” that a copyright owner has “to distribute copies. . . of [a] copyrighted work,” 17 U. S. C. §106(3), are qualified by the application of several limitations set out in §§107 through 122, including the “first sale” doctrine, which provides that “the owner of a particular copy or phono record lawfully made under this title . . . isentitled, without the authori $0 (03-19-2013 - NY) |
SOFA Entertainment, Inc. v. Dodger Productions, Inc. |
This is a copyright infringement suit over a seven-second clip of Ed Sullivan’s introduction of the Four Seasons on The Ed Sullivan Show. Appellees Dodger Productions, Inc. and Dodger Theatricals, Ltd. (collectively “Dodger”) used the clip in their musical about the Four Seasons, Jersey Boys, to mark a historical point in the band’s career. |
Navico, Inc. v. Garmin International, Inc. |
Navico, Inc. sued Garmin International, Inc., Aaron Coleman, Jason Detring, Jeffrey Hanoch, John Matson, Kevin Brown and Lance Lybarger claiming: |
Gail Bierman v. Scott Weier |
This defamation case concerns Mind, Body and Soul, a book written by Scott Weier. In the author’s words, the book is “based on my life.” It discusses Scott’s personal transformation, largely through his relationship with God, following his divorce “on bad terms” from his first wife. Scott’s ex-wife and her father concluded the book falsely accused them of lying, abuse, and suffering $0 (01-18-2013 - IA) |
Mattel, Inc. v. MGA Entertainment, Inc. |
The last time Mattel and MGA were here, we predicted that “the entire case will probably need to be retried.” Mattel, Inc. v. MGA Entm’t, Inc., 616 F.3d 904, 918 (9th Cir. 2010). On remand, the district court agreed and ordered a new trial. |
Swarovski Aktiengesellschaft v. Building #19, Inc. |
Defendant-appellant Building #19, Inc. appeals from the entry of a preliminary injunction restricting its use of the word "Swarovski" in newspaper advertising to a certain font size. The case is ongoing in the district court, with requests for permanent injunctive relief pending. The dispute began when Building #19 obtained a number of Swarovski crystal figurines that it hoped to resell, and in o $0 (01-10-2013 - RI) |
Donald A. Harney v. Sony Pictures Television, Inc. |
On a sunny April day in 2007, freelancer Donald Harney snapped a photograph ("the Photo") of a blond girl in a pink coat riding piggyback on her father's shoulders as they emerged from a Palm Sunday service in the Beacon Hill section of Boston. Just over a year later, the pair in the Photo became a national media sensation. The father, soon-to-be revealed as a German citizen who had assumed the n $0 (01-07-2013 - MA) |
MVP Entertainment, Inc. v. Mark Frost |
Title 17 United States Code section 204(a) (section 204) of the Copyright Act provides: “A transfer of copyright ownership, other than by operation of law, is not valid unless an instrument of conveyance, or a note or memorandum of the transfer, is in writing and signed by the owner of the rights conveyed or such owner‟s duly authorized agent.” We affirm the entry of summary judgment against $0 (11-07-2012 - CA) |
Steven Gerhardson v. Gopher News Company |
Steven Gerhardson, Ron Hanek, Mike Johnson, and Jim Costello (collectively, drivers) were unionized delivery drivers covered by a collective bargaining agreement (CBA). The CBA established a pension plan operated by a third-party pension management firm. A dispute arose in 2006 after the drivers’ employer and union renegotiated the CBA. The drivers sued their employer, the union, and the pension $0 (11-06-2012 - MN) |
S.J.W. v. Lee's Summit R-7 School Dist. |
The Lee's Summit R-7 School District ("the School District") issued 180-day suspensions to twin brothers Steven and Sean Wilson (together, "the Wilsons") on January 11, 2012 for disruption caused by a website the Wilsons created. The Wilsons filed suit against the School District on March 6, 2012, alleging, along with other claims, that the School District violated their rights to free speech. The $0 (10-17-2012 - MO) |
Jesse Meyer v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC |
Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (PRA) appeals the September 14, 2011 district court order granting Jesse Meyer’s motion for a preliminary injunction and provisional class certification. Meyer’s complaint alleged that PRA’s debt collection efforts violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), 47 U.S.C. § 227. The district court’s preliminary injunction restrained PRA from using $0 (10-12-2012 - CA) |
Don Johnson Productions, Inc. v. Tysher Entertainment |
Defendants, Rysher Entertainment, LLC, 2929 Entertainment, LP, and Qualia Capital, LLC, appeal from a judgment entered in favor of plaintiff, Don Johnson Productions, Inc. On December 7, 1994, plaintiff and Rysher Entertainment, LLC entered into a contract for the services of an actor, Don Johnson. Entitled the ―Term Agreement‖ (the contract), it provided for production of the ―Nash Bridges $0 (10-01-2012 - CA) |
Deborah Watts v. Lester E. Cox Mesical Center d/b/a Family Medical Care Center |
Deborah Watts filed the underlying medical malpractice action alleging that her son, Naython Watts, was born with disabling brain injuries because Cox Medical Centers and its associated physicians (collectively, Cox) provided negligent health care services. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Watts and awarded $1.45 million in non-economic damages and $3.371 million in future medical damages. $0 (07-31-2012 - MO) |
Alvertis Isbell v. DM Records |
Alvertis Isbell, aka Al Bell, sued DM Records on a copyright infringement theory claiming that Defendant wrongfully used the song "Whoomp! (There it is) and "Dazzey Duks" on the airways and at sporting arenas nearly two decades ago. |
Capitol Records, Inc. v. Jammie Thomas-Rasset |
This appeal arises from a dispute between several recording companies and Jammie Thomas-Rasset. There is a complicated procedural history involving three jury trials, but for purposes of appeal, it is undisputed that Thomas-Rasset willfully infringed copyrights of twenty-four sound recordings by engaging in file-sharing on the Internet. After a first jury found Thomas-Rasset liable and awarded dam $0 (09-11-2012 - MN) |
Christian Louboutin, S.A. v. Yves Saint Laurent America Holding, Inc. |
The question presented is whether a single color may serve as a legally protected trademark in the fashion industry and, in particular, as the mark for a particular style of high fashion women’s footwear. Christian Louboutin, a designer of high-fashion women’s footwear and accessories, has since 1992 painted the “outsoles” of his women’s high-heeled shoes with a high-gloss red lacquer. I $0 (09-05-2012 - NY) |
WPIX, Inc. v. IVI, Inc. |
In this case, plaintiffs-appellees -- producers and owners of copyrighted television programming -- sued defendants-appellants ivi, Inc. ("ivi") and its Chief Executive Officer, Todd Weaver, for streaming plaintiffs' copyrighted television programming over the Internet live and without their consent. The district court granted a preliminary injunction for plaintiffs, holding that: (1) plaintiffs w $0 (08-29-2012 - NY) |
Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. v. Fidelity Communications Co. |
Nexstar Broadcasting and Mission Broadcasting (Licensees) appeal from a take-nothing summary judgment respecting their breach of contract claim against Fidelity Communications. Licensees are owners of the broadcast licenses of four television stations, and Fidelity is the owner of a regional cable television system. Pursuant to their contract, Fidelity agreed to pay Licensees for the right to retr $0 (08-24-2012 - TX) |
Noella Lorenzo Mong v. Maya Magazines, Inc. |
This appeal reads like a telenovela, a Spanish soap opera. It pits music celebrities, who make money by promoting themselves, against a gossip magazine, that makes money by publishing celebrity photographs, with a paparazzo, who apparently stole the disputed pictures, stuck in the middle. |
Next Page |