Authors Guild Inc., et al. v. Google, Inc. |
The United States of America, by and through counsel, submits this statement of its views |
Simmons v. Stanberry |
16 Plaintiff Tyrone Simmons appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for |
United States v. Thompson |
The challenged portions of the indictment are as follows. Counts Seven through Twelve charge violations of three similar statutes: 18 U.S.C. §§ 2422 (in the indictment, "Interstate Prostitution"), 2421 ("Mann Act"), and 2423 ("Illicit Transportation of a Minor"). The Interstate Prostitution counts allege that Defendant induced "one or more individuals to travel in interstate commerce to engage in $0 (12-26-2015 - NY) |
United States of America v. Rex Yang, Jake Schwartz and Casey Lee Ross |
Kansas City, MO - Six Defendants Plead Guilty to $100 Million Software Piracy Scheme |
Pipal Tech Ventures Private Limited v. MoEngage, Inc. |
Plaintiff Pipal Tech is a closely-held corporation formed in 2011 under the laws of India with its principal place of business in India.4 Pipal Tech is in the business of developing, licensing, and supporting mobile and web-based applications. Non-parties Amit Baid, Raviteja Dodda, and Yashwanth Kumar are the founders of Pipal Tech.6 Dodda and Kumar are also former executives and board The fact $0 (12-19-2015 - DE) |
United States of America v. Alvaun Thompson |
A second superseding indictment charges Defendant in Count One with sex trafficking a child under the age of 14, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591(a)(1), (a)(2), (b)(1); in Counts Two and Three with sex trafficking a child under the age of 18, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1591(a)(1), (a)(2), (b)(1), (b)(2); in Count Four with promoting prostitution, in violation of the Travel Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1952 $0 (12-18-2015 - NY) |
BMG Rights Management (US), LLC v. Cox Communications, Inc., et al. |
Alexandria, VA - BMG Rights Management (US), LLC sued Cox Communications, Inc., FoxCom, LLC and Cox Enterprises, Inc. claiming that the defendants violated copyright laws by failing to reasonably implement a repeat-infringer policy and claiming that it was not entitled to the safe harbor exception under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Plaintiff claimed that Cox to be less than cooperative in $25000000 (12-17-2015 - VA) |
Gregory Berry v. LexisNexis Risk and Information |
The class action settlement at issue in this appeal is “the culmination of years of litigation and negotiations” between class counsel and the defendants, LexisNexis Risk and Information Analytics Group, Inc.; Seisint, Inc.; and Reed Elsevier Inc. (together, “Lexis”). Berry v. LexisNexis Risk & Info. Analytics Grp., Inc., No. 3:11-CV-754, 2014 WL 4403524, at *1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 5, 2014). The dis $0 (12-07-2015 - VA) |
Leica Microsystems Inc v. Hernandez et al |
In this removed action, plaintiff-counterdefendant’s motion to remand presents the |
United States of America v. Rocky P. Ouprasith |
Norfolk, VA - Operator of Second-Largest Music Piracy Website in the U.S. Sentenced to 3 Years for Criminal Copyright Infringement |
Duffey v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. |
Duffey alleges the following background facts in the operative complaint. The court |
USF&G v. Ashley Reed |
On July 12,2011, Plaintiff United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company ("USF&G") |
Hanover 3201 Realty LLC v. Village Supermarkets |
Hanover 3201 Realty, LLC (“Hanover Realty”) signed a contract with Wegmans to develop a supermarket on its property in Hanover, New Jersey. The agreement required Hanover Realty to secure all necessary governmental permits and approvals prior to breaking ground. Village Supermarkets, Inc. (“ShopRite”) owns the local ShopRite. Once ShopRite and its subsidiary Hanover and Horsehill Development L $0 (11-13-2015 - NJ) |
Authors Guild v. Google, Inc. |
This copyright dispute tests the boundaries of fair use. Plaintiffs, who are authors of |
Revolution Retail Systems, LLC v. Sentinel Technologies, Inc. |
In 2011, Vector proposed a term sheet to acquire Tidel and its subsidiary, |
Authors Guild v. Google, Inc. |
This copyright dispute tests the boundaries of fair use. Plaintiffs, who are authors of 27 |
Sprengel v. Zbylut |
In 2008, Jean Sprengel, a licensed anesthesiologist, wrote and published a guidebook for treating the side effects of chemotherapy. In March of 2008, Lanette Mohr and Sprengel agreed to form a business to market the guidebook. They retained Kenneth Stream to assist them in forming “Purposeful Press,” a limited liability corporation that would develop and distribute Sprengel’s work. Stream prepa $0 (10-14-2015 - CA) |
Bikram's Yoga College of India, LP v. Evolation Yoga, LLC |
Court decides whether a sequence of twenty-six yoga poses and two breathing exercises developed by Bikram Choudhury and described in his 1979 book, Bikram’s Beginning Yoga Class, is entitled to copyright protection. |
Lucent Technologies v. State Bd. Equalization |
The telephone and data network in the United States is both terrestrial (land-based) and wireless, and is seamlessly interconnected through equipment called switches that are housed in so-called central offices scattered around the country. A single switch is comprised of “numerous computer processors, frames (sometimes called cabinets), shelves, drawers, circuit packs, cables, trunks and many ot $0 (10-09-2015 - CA) |
Gloria Coots Baldwin v. EMI Feist Catalog, Inc. |
19 This appeal involves a dispute over the copyright in the musical |
DC Comics v. MARK TOWLE, an individual, DBA Garage Gotham |
SUMMARY** |
Edward C. O'Bannon, Jr. v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, aka, The NCAA |
Section 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, 15 U.S.C. |
American Tradition Inst. v. Rector and Visitors |
In this appeal, we consider whether the Circuit Court of Prince William County ("trial court") erred by denying a request for disclosure of certain documents under the Virginia Freedom of Information Act ("VFOIA"), Code § 2.2-3700 et seq., and whether a public body may impose charges for the cost of reviewing documents under the statutory exclusion. |
Stephanie Lenz v. Universal Music Corp. |
Stephanie Lenz filed suit under 17 U.S.C. § 512(f)—part |
WNET, Thirteen v. Aereo, Inc.; Am. Broad. Cos., Inc. v. Aereo, Inc. |
The parties below agreed on all but one of the relevant facts of Aereo’s system, namely13 |
Next Page |