Oklahoma City trademark infringement Lanham Act lawyer represented the Plaintiff.

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with Massive $88M Business Telephone System Software License Piracy Scheme
Three Individuals Sentenced for Massive $88M Business Telephone System Software License Piracy Scheme

Amarillo, Texas intellectual property lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on trademark infringement theories.

Tulsa, Oklahoma copyright lawyers represents the Plaintiff who sued on a copyright infringement theory.

White Plains, New York patent infringement lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a patent infringement theory.

Bernalillo, New Mexico indian law lawyers represented the parties in an employment law case.

Fayetteville, Arkansas intellectual property lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a copyright violation infrigement.

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with criminal infringement of a copy right.

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

Cheyenne, Wyoming intellectual property lawyer represent the Plaintiff who sued on a copyright infringement theory.

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal law lawyer represented the Defendant, charged with:

Count # 1.
Count as Filed: ABOFF, PRISONER PLACING BODILY FLUIDS ON GOVERMENT EMPLOYEE, in violation of 21 O.S. 650.9
Date of Offense: 04/23/2023
Estrada, Anthony Louis
Disposed: DEFERRED, 04/15/2024. Guilty Plea
Count as Disposed: PRISONER PLACING BODILY FLUIDS ON GOVERMENT EMPLOYEE(ABOFF

Las Vegas, Nevada criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to smuggle heroin.

On June 21, 1990, the federal grand jury returned a one-count Indictment charging the defendant, Artem Bautista David, with conspiracy to import more than 20 kilos of heroin into the United States.

*1388 On July 13, 1990, David filed a Motion for Return of Property and S

¶1 Appellant, Dakoda Aaron McCauley, was tried and convicted by a jury in the District Court of Osage County, Case No. CF-2018-135, of Manslaughter in the First Degree (Heat of Passion), in violation of 21 O.S.2011, § 711.1 The jury sentenced McCauley to twenty-two years imprisonment. The Honorable Burl O. Estes, Associate District Judge, presided at trial and pronounced judgment and sentenc

Colorado Springs, Colorado criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with violation of a protective order.


In this appeal, we are asked to decide whether the district court made findings sufficient to support its denial of Kyle Andrew Zoller's motion to modify a no-contact provision issued as part of a mandatory protection order (MPO) under section 18-1-1001(1), (3)(a

Chicago, Illinois intellectual property law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a copyright infringement theory.

(a) Anyone who violates any of the exclusive rights of the copyright owner as provided by sections 106 through 122 or of the author as provided in section 106A(a), or who imports copies or phonorecords into the United States in violation of section 602, is an infringer

Chicago, Illinois intellectual property law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a trademark infringement theory under 15 U.S.C. 1114 violation theory.

(1) Any person who shall, without the consent of the registrant— (a) use in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distribu

Portland, Oregon intellectual property lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a trademark infringement theory under the Landham Act.

"The Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1051 et seq., was enacted by Congress in 1946. The Act provides for a national system of trademark registration and protects the owner of a federally registered mark against the use of similar marks i

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma copyright infringement lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a copyright
infringement theoy.

As a general matter, copyright infringement occurs when a copyrighted work is reproduced, distributed, performed, publicly displayed, or made into a derivative work without the permission of the copyright owner. What is peer-to-peer (P2P) network

Los Angeles, California intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff and Defendants in a copyright infringement dispute.

Plaintiff claimed that Defendant violation a copyright that he owned of a photograph that he took of Miles Davis when placing a tattoo on the arm of a friend by the former star of the reality shows “Miami Ink” and “LA Ink” was not similar

Cincinnati, Ohio criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with romance-fraud conspiracy and making false statements on a COVID‑relief application.

From January 2019 through July 2021, Benjamin Adu Acheampong, 37, of Fairfield, Ohio, conspired with others to create false online profiles, which the conspirators used to express romantic interest in victims. Once the

Los Angeles, California intellectual property law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory 17 U.S.C. 501, which provides:

(a) Anyone who violates any of the exclusive rights of the copyright owner as provided by sections 106 through 122 or of the author as provided in section 106A(a), or who imports copies or phonorecords into the United

Tenton, New Jersey personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

"New Jersey auto negligence law follows a comparative negligence system, meaning that both parties involved in an accident can be partly responsible for the damages. Here are some key points to understand:

Duty of Care:

Every driver has