| United States of America v. Paul David Mitchell, II |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with two counts of bank rubbery. |
| State of Nevada v. Ocean Celestino Camacho |
|
Las Vegas, Nevada, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with two counts of first-degree murder with the use of a deadly weapon, conspiracy to commit murder, attempted murder with the use of a deadly weapon, and two firearm discharge offenses. |
| United States of America v. Bryan Ross |
|
Pierre, South Dakota, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with failing to appear in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 3146(a)(l) and 3146(b)(l)(A)(ii). |
| State of Nebraska v. Ivell M. Hagens |
|
Omaha, Nebraska, first degree sexual assault of a child, a Class IB felony 1; incest |
| United States of America v. James L. Hattten, II |
|
Omaha, Nebraska, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with sex trafficking a minor in violation of 18 U.S. 1591. |
| Justin Hooper v. The City of Tulsa |
|
Justin Hooper and the City of Tulsa dispute whether the Curtis Act, 30 Stat. 495 (1898), grants Tulsa jurisdiction over municipal violations committed by all Tulsa’s inhabitants, including Indians, in Indian country. Tulsa issued a traffic citation to Mr. Hooper, an Indian and member of the Choctaw Nation, and he paid a $150 fine for the ticket in Tulsa’s Municipal Criminal Court (“municipal $0 (06-28-2023 - OK) |
| MARVIN KEITH STITT, Appellant v. THE CITY OF TULSA, Appellee |
|
¶1 Appellant, Marvin Keith Stitt, was convicted of Aggravated Speeding (Tulsa, Okla., Rev. Ordinances Title 37, § 617(C) (2021)) following a non-jury trial before the Honorable Mitchell McCune, Municipal Judge, and fined $250.00 in City of Tulsa Municipal Court Citation/Case No. 7569655. |
| DAKODA AARON MCCAULEY, Appellant v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Appellee |
|
¶1 Appellant, Dakoda Aaron McCauley, was tried and convicted by a jury in the District Court of Osage County, Case No. CF-2018-135, of Manslaughter in the First Degree (Heat of Passion), in violation of 21 O.S.2011, § 711.1 The jury sentenced McCauley to twenty-two years imprisonment. The Honorable Burl O. Estes, Associate District Judge, presided at trial and pronounced judgment and sentence in $0 (11-08-2025 - OK) |
| THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Appellant v. STEVEN LEON FULLER, Appellee. |
|
¶1 The State of Oklahoma appeals the order of the reviewing judge affirming an adverse ruling of the magistrate dismissing the criminal charges in Ottawa County District Court Case No. CF-2022-215 for lack of jurisdiction. See 22 O.S.2011, §§ 1089.1--1089.7; Rule 6.1, Rules of the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals, Title 22, Ch.18, App. (2024). |
| MICHAEL GARY PARKER, JR., Appellant v. STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Appellee. |
|
¶1 Appellant Michael Gary Parker, Jr. appeals his Judgment and Sentence from the District Court of Tulsa County, Case No. CF-2018-3184, for First Degree Manslaughter, in violation of 21 O.S.2011, § 711.1 Parker's jury unanimously found him guilty, but deadlocked on the issue of punishment. The Honorable William J. Musseman, Jr., District Judge, who presided over Parker's jury trial, sentenced Pa $0 (07-15-2021 - OK) |
| THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Appellant v. DALTON WAYNE WARD, Appellee |
|
¶1 The State of Oklahoma, Appellant, appeals from an order sustaining Appellee's motion to dismiss a charge of assault and battery on a police officer filed in the District Court of Mayes County, Case No. CF-2019-295. The trial court held an evidentiary hearing on Appellee's motion to dismiss, and, relying on McGirt v. Oklahoma, 140 S. Ct. 2452 (2020), and Hogner v. State, 2021 OK CR 4, 500 P.3d $0 (08-18-2022 - OK) |
| John Hogner v. State of Oklahoma |
|
¶1 Appellant Travis John Hogner was charged and tried by jury for Feloniously Pointing a Firearm (21 O.S.Supp.2012, § 1289.16) or in the alternative Domestic Assault with a Dangerous Weapon (21 O.S.Supp.2014, § 644) (Count I); Possession of a Firearm, After Former Conviction of a Felony (21 O.S. Supp.2014, § 1283) (Counts II and III); Kidnapping (21 O.S.Supp.2012, § 751 (Count V); Interferenc $0 (03-11-2021 - OK) |
| Commonwealth of Kentucky v. William Rutherford |
|
Lexington, Kentucky, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with two counts of conspiracy first-degree wanton endangerment for discharging a firearm, and engaging in organized crime. |
| State of Texas v. Elijah Turner Reyes |
|
El Paso, Texas, man charged with murder. |
| United States of America v. Reiss Nicole Biby |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with misprision of a felony in violation of 18 U.S.C. 4, which provides: |
| Charles Farden v. United States of America |
|
Albuquerque, New Mexico personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a Federal Tort Claims Act claim. |
| State of Maine v. Heather M. Hodgson |
|
Augusta, Maine, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with |
| United States of America v. Jose Urena-Capellan |
|
Scranton, Pennsylvania criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Drug Trafficking Offense |
| United States of America v. Jose Urena-Capellan |
|
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Drug Trafficking Offense |
| United States of America v. Jonathan Warren Jones |
|
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with enticement of a minor. |
| Ibhar Al Mheid v. Kathy Mincihew, et al. |
|
Macon, Georgia, Ibhar Al Mheid, proceeding pro se, without a lawyer, filed a lawsuit in the Northern District of Georgia against a police officer, a prosecutor, a state court judge, and a jail healthcare provider, bringing claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and state law. |
| State of Maine v. Zane Ibrahim |
|
Portland, Maine, riminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with Class C criminal threatening, Class C reckless conduct and Class E terrorizing. |
| State of Vermont v. Aaron Loucks |
|
Burlington, Vermont, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with two counts of aggravated disorderly conduct. Prosecutors added a hate crime. |
| United States of America v. Byron Cordell Thomas |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with two counts of sex |
| United States of America v. Ignacio Chavez |
|
Roswell, New Mexico, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with distribution of 50 grams and mroe fo meth, use of a communications facility to further the commission of a drug trafficking crime, |
|
Next Page |