Stephanie Brown v. Safe Streets USA, LLC |
Salt Lake City, Utah consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a Telephone Consumer Protection Act violation theory. |
Alana Marie Souza, et al. v. Brick House, Inc. |
Eugene, Oregon intellectual property lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a 15 U.S.C. 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) violation theory. |
United States of America v. Ernesto Gonzalez Campos |
Tamps, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with taking, killing, or possessing migratory birds. |
Lisa Posthumus Lyons v. My Pillow, Inc. |
Grand Rapids, Michigan personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on assault, libel and slander theories. |
United States of America v. Larry Clyde Daniels |
Shreveport, Louisiana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with distribution of controlled substances outside the bounds of professional medical practice. |
Rita Green v. State Farm Lloyds |
Lubbock, Texas insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a bad faith breach of an insurance contract. |
Charles Thomas Wesner, Jr. v. Mark Southall, et al. |
Dallas, Texas consumer credit lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on Fair Debt Collection Act violation theories. |
Natalie Preston v. Baltimore City Police Department |
Baltimore, Maryland employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a civil rights discrimination theory under 5 u.S.C. 7703. |
United States of America v. Cambria County Area Agency on Aging |
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania qui tam lawyers represented the Defendant accused of violating the False Claims Act. |
United States of America v. Erik Addison |
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of a machinegun in furtherance of drug trafficking and other offenses. |
Perry Beeney et al. v. FCA U.S., LLC, et al. |
Providence, Rhode Island consumer law lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on consumer protection, common law money had and received and unjust enrichment theories. |
Starna Zhang v. Exelero, et al. |
Boston, Massachusetts consumer credit lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on wrongful debt collection activities. |
Claudia Lobo Puerto v. Happy Life Home Health Agency Inc., et al. |
New York, New York employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Fair Labor Standards Act failure to pay Minimum wage overtime compensation. |
United States of America v. Michael Castillero, a/k/a Michael Alejandro, Francine Lanaia, and Brian Martinsen |
New York City, New York criminal defense lawyers representing the Defendants charged with onspiracy, securities fraud, wire fraud, and investment adviser fraud in connection with their management of StraightPath Venture Partners LLC (“SPVP”), StraightPath Management LLC, and nine related StraightPath Funds. They were also charged with conspiracy to obstruct justice and obstruction of justice i $0 (11-29-2023 - CT) |
United States of America v. Jeffery D. Parmly |
Peoria, Illinois criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with enticement of female minor. |
Linda Reuter v. PCA Acquisitions V, LLC |
Chicago, Illinois consumer credit lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a 15:1692 Fair Debt Collection Act violation theory. |
Marcellina Cordes v. United Specialty Insurance Company, et al. |
Paducah, Kentucky insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory. |
John Rettig v. West Chester Holdings, LLC, d/b/a West Chester Protective Gear |
Cincinnati, Ohio civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on an Americans with Disabilities Act violation theory. |
Brittany Jackson v. HarborChase of Beavercreek, et al. |
Dayton, Ohio civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) theory. |
United States of America, ex rel. Ann Keating v. London Bridge Trading Company, Ltd. (“LBT”) |
Columbus, Ohio qui tam lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on False Claims Act violation theory claiming that London Bridge Trading Company, Ltd. (“LBT”) failed to comply with the requirements of the Buy American Act (“BAA”), Trade Agreements Act (“TAA”) and Berry Amendment when selling textile-based products to the Department of Defense. |
Howard Friedman v. Denis McDonough |
Cleveland, Ohio civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) theory. |
Christie Poitra v. Michigan States University |
Grand Rapids, Michigan civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) theory. |
Michael Lubin v. FCA US, LLC |
Flint, Michigan civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a 2000e job discrimination theory. |
United States of America v. Albert Morrison |
Detroit, Michigan criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with accepting bribes from a local contractor and tax evasion. |
Donald Black, et al. v. Mantei & Associates, Ltd., et al. |
Columbia, South Carolina civil litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on Securities Exchange Act violation theories under 15 U.S.C. 78m. |
Next Page |