Merle D. Brendeland v. Iowa Department of Transportation |
|
Tony Phillip v. Dominium Management Services, LLC |
|
United States of America v. Georgy Kavzharadze |
Russian Citizen Sentenced to 40 Months for Selling Stolen Financial Information on the Criminal Internet Marketplace SlilppMore... $0 (08-14-2024 - DC) |
United States of America v. Scott Raul Esparza |
Texas Man Sentenced to 9 Months in Federal Prison for Operating Website that Offered Computer Attack Services |
State of Texas v. Lindsay Smith |
|
United States of America v. Steve Bonner, et al. |
|
State of Oklahoma ex rel. Department of Transportation v. West Bank Storages, LLC |
Tulsa, Oklahoma condemnation lawyer Andrew A. Shank represented the Defendant who was sued on an eminent domain theory by the Oklahoma Department of Transportation theory seeking to take the storage business for used to expand Interstate I-44 in West Tulsa. |
Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. DWB Family Trust, et al. |
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma eminent domain lawyer represented the Defendant who was sued by the Oklahoma Turnpike Authority to condemn certain rights, title and interest in real property for public purposes. |
United States of America v. James Pickett |
A Delaware resident was sen... More... $0 (03-28-2024 - DE) |
United States of America v. Sakiru Olanrewaju Ambali |
|
United States of America v. Sirous Asgari |
In 2012, federal agents learned that Iranian scientist Sirous |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JOHN MADDUX, JR.; CHRISTINA CARMAN; JULIE COSCIA; MICHAEL E.SMITH |
RE The defendants here took part in a decade-long scheme |
Wayne Brown v. City of Tulsa |
Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983. |
Alana Marie Souza, et al. v. Brick House, Inc. |
Eugene, Oregon intellectual property lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a 15 U.S.C. 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) violation theory. |
City of Tulsa v. Geraldine Hunt, et al. |
Tulsa, Oklahoma condemnation lawyer represented the Defendants sued eminent domain theories to acquire certain rights, title and interests owned by them in real property needed by the City of Tulsa for public purposes. |
United States of America v. Chibundu Joseph Anuebunwa |
New York City, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged for his role in fraudulent business email compromise scams that targeted thousands of victims around the world, including in the United States. |
Norma Anderson, et al. v. Jena Griswold, in her official capacity as Colorado Secretary of State and Donald J. Trump |
Denver, constitutional law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant seeking a declaratory judgment that Donald Trump violated the 14th Amendment on January 5, 2021 and should be barred from serving as President again. |
Jose Ruiz v. Paramount Global, Inc. |
New York City, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
Minal Ashokkumar Patel, et al. v. Central Utah Clinic, et al |
Salt Lake City, Utah personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on medical malpractice theories. |
United States of America v. Chibundu Joseph Anuebunwa |
New York City, New Ork criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with wire fraud conspiracy in connection with his participation in fraudulent business email compromise scams that targeted thousands of victims around the world, including in the United States. |
David Charles Long v. Social Security Administration |
Tulsa, Oklahoma social security disability lawyer represented Plaintiff seeking review of the denial of his application for Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI benefits by HHS. |
City of Tulsa v. Arnett Starks, et al. |
Tulsa, Oklahoma condemnation law lawyer represented the Defendants who were sued by the Plaintiff on an eminent domain law theory seeking to acquire by the exercise of eminent domain certain rights, title and interest o real property owned by the Defendants for public use. |
City of Oklahoma City v. David Furman Cosper |
Norman, Oklahoma condemnation lawyers represented Defendants who were sued by Plaintiff seeking to acquire by eminent domain certain rights, title and interests in their land for public used. |
Noah Lebowitz v. Harmoney Nutraceuticals, LLC |
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a trademark infringement theory under 15 U.S.C. 1114, which provides: |
Alayna Marie Manville v. Adam Klein |
$0 (04-06-2023 - FL)
|
Next Page |