United States of America v. Vladimir Tsastsin |
New York, NY - Vladimir Tsastin pled guilty to wire fraud and computer intrusion charges arising from his operation of a massive and sophisticated Internet fraud scheme that infected with malware more than four million computers located in over 100 countries. The malware secretly altered the settings on infected computers, enabling TSASTSIN and the six other charged defendants – Timur Gerassimen... More... $0 (07-08-2015 - NY) |
Ann Teitelbaum v. South Florida Water Management District |
Ann Teitelbaum and a group of private property owners (“the Plaintiffs”) |
In the Interest of LG, a child |
Appellant mother (“Mother”) appeals the trial court’s order terminating her parental rights to her child, L.G. Mother does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial court’s findings under section 161.001(1) of the Texas Family Code (“the Code”), but contends the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support the trial court’s finding that termination was in the ... More... $0 (07-08-2015 - TX) |
United States ex rel., Steven Hartpence v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc. |
If a whistleblower informs the government that it has |
Stacy Cox v. First National Bank |
Stacy A. Cox sued First National Bank of Omaha for gender discrimination |
State of Kansas v. Raymond Carl Swint |
Raymond C. Swint appeals his convictions of aggravated indecent |
Webb Golden Valley, L.L.C. v. State of Minnesota |
This appeal arises from a dispute over the State of Minnesota’s proposed |
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. 6354 Figarden General Partnership |
This appeal presents issues of statutory construction involving Code of Civil |
Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission |
In 2000, Arizona voters adopted an initiative, Proposition |
Sioux Pharm, Inc. and Sioux Biochemical, Inc. v. Eagle Laboratories, Inc. |
In this case involving claims for misappropriation of trade secrets, |
Paul B. Tartell, M.C. v. South Florida Sinus and Allergy Center, Inc. and Lee M. Mandel, M.D. |
This appeal requires us to decide whether the district court clearly erred when it found that a physician’s name had acquired “secondary meaning,” Tana v. Dantanna’s, 611 F.3d 767, 774 (11th Cir. 2010) (internal quotation marks omitted). Dr. Paul B. Tartell and Dr. Lee M. Mandel jointly practiced medicine in South Florida until 2011. After they split their practices, Dr. Mandel registered ... More... $0 (06-25-2015 - FL) |
State of Oklahoma, ex rel., Department of Transportation v. Marshall J. Farr, et al. |
Claremore, OK - State of Oklahoma, ex rel., Department of Transportation sued Marshall J. Farr and Vicki R. Farr, husband and wife, Bank of the Lakes, O'Reilly Auto Parts, the City of Catoosa, The Rogers County Treasurer and Cherokee Nation Enterprises, LLC on eminent domain seeking to obtain by condemnation certain rights, title and interests real property owned or in which the defendants had som... More... $0 (06-24-2015 - OK) |
David Laughing Horse Robinson v. Sally Jewell |
In this appeal, the Kawaiisu, a non-federally recognized |
Marvin D. Horne v. Department of Agriculture |
Under the United States Department of Agriculture’s California Raisin Marketing Order, a percentage of agrower’s crop must be physically set aside in certain yearsfor the account of the Government, free of charge. The Government then sells, allocates, or otherwise disposes of the raisins in ways it determines are best suited to maintaining an orderly market. The question is whether the Takings... More... $0 (06-22-2015 - CA) |
Stephen Kimbel v. Marvel Entertainment, L.L.C. |
In Brulotte v. Thys Co., 379 U. S. 29 (1964), this Court held that a patent holder cannot charge royalties for the use of his invention after its patent term has expired. The sole question presented here is whether we should overrule Brulotte. Adhering to principles of stare decisis, we decline to do so. Critics of the Brulotte rule must seek relief not from this Court but from Congress. |
United States of America v. Jesus Rosales-Bruno |
This is the second appeal to come before us involving a sentence imposed on |
Alachua County v. Expedia, Inc. |
This case is before this Court for review of the decision of the First District |
Dana Eldon Baker v. Marlin Michael Sabinash |
[¶1] Marlin and Tanya Sabinash appealed from a corrected judgment quieting title to real property located in Stutsman County to Dana Baker. Because the district court erred as a matter of law in determining the county tax lien was superior to the interest held by the State through a Bank of North Dakota mortgage on the property, we reverse and remand for entry of judgment quieting title to the pr... More... $0 (06-11-2015 - ND) |
Tulsa Development Authority v. Charles R. Sturner |
Tulsa, OK - the Tulsa Development Authority sued Charles R. Sturner on an eminent domain theory seeking to acquire by condemnation certain rights, title and interests in real property owned by Mr. Sturner for public use. |
Nunamta Aulukestal v. State of Alaska |
Challenged in this case are land and water use permits allowing intensive |
Vernon L. Crownover v. Garland Keel |
|
Lilli Shoen v. Juliet Zacarias |
A trial court has the power to issue an equitable easement authorizing a trespasser to continue her trespass in exchange for paying damages, but only if, among other things, the hardship on the trespasser in ceasing the trespass is “greatly disproportionate” to the hardship on the land’s owner in losing use of the trespassed-upon portion of her land. (E.g., Tashakori v. Lakis (2011) 196 Cal.... More... $0 (05-22-2015 - CA) |
In the Int of MC, MC, MC, MC, and MC, Children |
Appellant father (“Father”) and appellant mother (“Mother”) separately appeal the trial court’s order terminating their parental rights to their five children. On appeal, neither parent challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support the trial court’s findings relating to the statutory grounds for termination. Rather, both contend the evidence is legally and factually insufficien... More... $0 (05-18-2015 - TX) |
State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Transportation v. North Yale Auto Parts, Inc. |
Tulsa, OK - the State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Transportation sued North Yale Auto Parts, Inc. on an eminent domain theory seeking to acquire by condemnation certain rights, title and interest in real property owned by the |
David H. Neighbor v. Westar Energy, Inc. |
This case requires us to determine whether the Kansas saving statute applies to appeals from appraisers' awards in eminent domain proceedings. Landowner David Neighbor timely filed his appeal under K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 26-508, and the district court later granted his motion to dismiss it without prejudice. About 5 months later Neighbor appealed again, relying upon K.S.A. 60-518 to save the appeal fro... More... $0 (05-13-2015 - KS) |
Next Page |