This is a class action filed in November 2017 by former Minnesota employees
of Honeywell International Inc. who retired before age 65 during the terms of
Honeywell’s 2007 and 2010 collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) with Local
1145 of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters. Plaintiffs alleged that
Honeywell’s announced plan to terminate early retiree healthcare benefits at ... More...   $0 (03-21-2019 - MN)

A disability insurer, Hartford
Life and Accident Insurance Company ("Hartford"), gave notice to
Theresa Fortier that the long-term disability ("LTD") benefits it
had provided her under the Dartmouth Hitchcock Clinic Company Long
Term Disability Plan (the "Plan") would expire because she had not
shown she was eligible for a continuation of those benefits. The
notice informed... More...   $0 (02-20-2019 - NH)

18 The principal issue in this appeal is whether the United States District
19 Court for the Western District of New York (Larimer, J.) awarded an adequate
20 equitable remedy for violations under the Employee Retirement Income
21 Security Act of 1974 ... More...   $0 (01-14-2019 - NY)

A long-time county employee decided to retire, and in December 2012, he
submitted his application for retirement to the county’s retirement authority. On January
1, 2013, the California Public Employees’ Pension Reform Act of 2013 (Pension Reform
Act or PEPRA) took effect. Included in that measure is a provision that mandates the
complete or partial forfeiture of pension benefits/p... More...   $0 (12-04-2018 - CA)

A former employee and participant in Intel’s retirement plans sued the company for allegedly investing retirement funds in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Intel moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the limitations period for his claims had expired. The magistrate judge1 converted Intel’s motion to dismiss into a motion for summary judgment and entered... More...   $0 (11-29-2018 - CA)

Plaintiffs John Brotherston and
Joan Glancy are two former employees of Putnam Investments, LLC
who participated in Putnam's defined-contribution 401(k)
retirement plan (the "Plan"). They brought this lawsuit on behalf
of a now-certified class of other participants in the Plan, and on
behalf of the Plan itself pursuant to the civil enforcement
provision of the Employee Reti... More...   $0 (10-22-2018 - MA)

Plaintiff-appellant Susan Hennen worked as a sales specialist for NCR Corporation from 2010 to May 2012, when she sought treatment for a back injury. As an employee, Hennen was covered by long-term disability in-surance under a group policy provided by defendant-appel-lee Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“MetLife”). When physical therapy and surgery failed to resolve her injury,
2 No. 17-3... More...   $0 (09-17-2018 - il)

Jane Doe's insurer, Harvard
Pilgrim Health Care ("HPHC"), deemed part of the time Doe spent at
a mental health residential treatment facility not medically
necessary under the health care benefits plan established by the
employer of Doe's parent. HPHC therefore denied coverage for that
portion of the treatment. After several unsuccessful
administrative appeals, Doe sued HPH... More...   $0 (09-13-2018 - MA)

Before we can attend to any other
issues in an employment discrimination case, we must first
determine who, in fact, employed the plaintiff. This question,
which seems as though it ought to be simple on its face, continues
to confound litigants and courts. This case presents issues
regarding the employer/employee relationship that arise
in the not‐so‐uncommon sc... More...   $0 (09-11-2018 - IL)

Thomas Martone, a former Whole Foods employee, brought an action against certain Whole Foods executives who are named fiduciaries for the company’s 401(k) plan. Martone alleges that these executives breached their fiduciary duties by allowing employees to continue to invest in Whole Foods stock while its value was artificially inflated due to a widespread overpricing scheme. The district court dis... More...   $0 (09-05-2018 - TX)