| Ramon Fontenez v. Helen of Troy, L.P. |
|
New York, New York civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued ona Americans with Disabilities Act violation theory. $0 (10-01-2025 - NY) |
| Habacue Apolinar Beltran v. Imamura, Inc. d/b/a Yakitori Sun-Chan |
|
New York, New York, employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Fair Labor Standards Act violation theory. $0 (10-01-2025 - NY) |
| United States of America v. Ernest L. Thomas II |
|
Pensacola, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of a firearm and ammunition by a convicted felon. |
| United States of America v. Cornelius Alexander Thompson |
|
Ocala, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Sexual Abuse Of A Federal Inmate And Receipt Of A Bribe By A Public Official. |
| Jason R. Nelson v. Altec Industries, Inc. |
|
Boston, Massachusetts, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs on breach of contract theories. |
| Juliana Rodriguez Morel, et al. v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America |
|
Concord, New Hampshire, insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiffs on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory. |
| John Conti, et al. v. Citizens Bank, N.A. |
|
Providence, Rhode Island, consumer law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on banking law violations. |
| State of Oklahoma v. Ronald Dean Minton |
|
Claremore, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: |
| State of Oklahoma v. T.J.B. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with lewd molestation and first-degree rape. |
| State of Oklahoma v. Sara Starling Fitzgerald |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with embezzlement by employee in violation of 21 O.S. 1461, which provides: |
| United States of America v. James Kooima |
|
Sioux Falls, South Dakota criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Production of Child Pornography |
| Brigette I. Bodie-Jernigan v. School Board of Broward County, Florida |
|
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a Americans With Disabilities Act job discrimination theory. |
| Zoe Ajjahnon v. Amerilife of North Carolina, L.L.C. |
|
Orlando, Florida, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt |
| United States of America v. Franklin Bonilla-Prometa |
|
Miami, Florida, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Maritime Drug Law Enforcement |
| United States of America v. Jade Price |
|
South Bend, Indiana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with wire fraud |
| United States of America v. Carlos A Lopez, Barrett R. Howell |
|
New Orleans, Louisiana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with Unauthorized Disposal of Government Records |
| United States of America v. Matthew Alan Stacy |
|
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with two federal drug counts under the Controlled Substances Act, 21 U.S.C. § 801 et seq. |
| United States of America v. Gabriel Cowan Metcalf |
|
Billing, Montana, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with violation of the Gun-Free School Zones Act, 18 U.S.C. § 922(q)(2)(A), |
| United States of America v. James Michael Wells |
|
Anchorage, Alaska, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with murdering two co-workers at a U.S. |
| United States of America v. Andrew Do |
|
Newark, N.J. criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Fraudulent Billing Practices and Kickbacks |
| Brandon King v. United Parcel Service, et al. |
|
Des Moines, Iowa, employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued job discrimination theory. |
| Anushka Bubey, et al. v. Department of Homeland Security |
|
Chicago, Illinois, immigration lawyers represented the Plaintiffs seeking review of adverse administrative decisions made by HHS. |
| Julie A. Tamm and Rosannea M. Przybylski v. Milan Nerad |
|
Grand Rapids, Michigan personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued Count I—First Amendment Retaliation (42 U.S.C. § 1983) (official and personal capacity); Count II—Llewellyn Preemption (state-law claim); Count III— Reasonableness Challenge – Square Lake (state-law claim); Count IV—Selective Enforcement Equal Protection) (§ 1983) (official an $0 (09-25-2025 - MI) |
| Thomas Michael Smith and Monaleto Sneed v. P.A.M. Transports, Inc. |
|
Nashville, Tennessee, employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a 42 U.S.C. § 2000e adn Tennessee Human Rights Act (THRA) violation theories. |
| United States of America, et al. v. Amazon, Inc. |
|
Seattle, Washington, commercial litigation lawyers represented Amazon accused of consumer fraud and abuse. |
|
Next Page |