In re Joyce Reece and Zachary Petitt |
Houston, Texas – Civil Litigation lawyer represented Relators with filing a petition for a writ of mandamus.In his first amended petition, Roy, acting as next friend for Clarice A. Thomas, brought claims against relators for fraud, false imprisonment, conversion, theft, unjust enrichment, and civil conspir More... $0 (11-24-2022 - TX)
|
DRC Construction v. Kelly Pickle |
Houston, Texas – Civil Litigation lawyer represented Appellant with a dispute about payment.In May 2019, DRC Construction and Pickle signed a contract concerning improvements to Pickle’s home, including repairs to a driveway and construction of a new garage. In June 2020, DRC Construction, through Calcar More... $0 (11-24-2022 - TX)
|
United States of America v. David Haley |
Nashville, Tennessee criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with filing false tax returns that omitted income he earned from his business. |
United States of America v. Larry Dayton |
Cleveland, Ohio criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with conspiring to defraud the IRS in connection with his ownership and operation of illegal gambling businesses in the Canton, Ohio area. |
United States of America v. Brian Kelsey |
Nashville, Tennessee criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with violating campaign finance laws and conspiring to defraud the Federal Election Commission (FEC) as part of a scheme to benefit his 2016 campaign for U.S. Congress. |
Harris County Fresh Water Supply District No. 61 v. Magellan Pipeline Company, L. P. and V-Tex Logistics LLC |
Houston, Texas – Civil Litigation lawyer represented Appellant with rather governmental entity is immune from a suit to condemn a portion of its property for an easement.A. The Pipeline Project Magellan Pipeline Company, LP and V-Tex Logistics, LLC are pipeline companies, and each owns its own pipeline syst More... $0 (11-23-2022 - TX)
|
United States of America v. James Millegan |
Portland, Oregon criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with tax evasion. |
United States of America v. Elizabeth Holmes |
San Jose, California criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with wire fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1349. |
United States of America v. Ruixue “Serena” Shi |
Los Angeles, California criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with wire fraud. |
United States of America v. Patrick Kasong Muyej and Chisanga Mable Scot |
Dallas, Texas criminal law lawyers represented Defendants charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud. |
RAHUL K. NATH, M.D. AND USHA NATH V. BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE AND TEXAS CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL |
Houston, Texas – Civil Litigation lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant claiming interfered with their sale of real property.To understand the claims, it is necessary to briefly recount the parties’ past litigation. The sanctions order that led to Nath I and Nath II In 2006, Rah More... $0 (11-22-2022 - TX)
|
United States of America v. Todd and Julie Crhisley |
Atlanta, Georgia criminal law lawyers represented Defendants charged with bank and tax fraud. |
United States of America v. Michael Feinberg and Betsy Feinberg |
Tucson, Arizona criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with securities and wire fraud. |
United States of America v. Jovante L. Champion |
Milwaukee, Wisconsin criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with four felony crimes: sex trafficking by force, fraud, or coercion; interstate transportation for prostitution; sex trafficking of a child and by force, fraud, or coercion; and transportation of a minor with intent to engage in criminal sexual activity. |
United States of America v. Emmitt T. Tiner |
East St. Louis, Illinois criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with wire fraud, extortion, sending interstate communications with the intent to extort, healthcare fraud, money laundering, and conducting financial transactions with criminally derived proceeds. |
Federal Trade Commission v. Superior Products International II, Inc. and Joseph E. Pritchett |
Kansas City, Kansas civil litigation lawyers represented Defendants accused of deceptive trade practices involving the marketing of Super Them and sunshield roof and wall coatings that wrongfully claimed to provide energy savings and claims of related R-values. |
State of Oklahoma v. Dafezeyeon D Holman |
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with: |
United States of America v. Robert L. Pryor, Elaine Pryor and Joshua L. Pryor |
Memphis, Tennessee criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with preparing and filing false tax returns. |
United States of America v. Jessie R. Benton |
San Diego, California criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with funneling illegal foreign campaign contributions from a Russian foreign national to a 2016 presidential campaign. |
United States of America v. Zane Paul Bennett |
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with unlawfully making a destructive device in violation of 26 U.S.C. 5861 It shall be unlawful for any person— |
United States of America v. Shahriar “Michael” Kalantari |
Los Angeles, California criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with health care fraud and prescription drug diversion scheme involving two Southern California pharmacies. |
United States of America v. Antonio Deon Fozard |
Raleigh, North Carolina criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with conspiracy to defraud the North Carolina Medicaid system. |
Veronica N. Arven and the estate of Theodore Arven III , ex rel. United States of America v. Florida Birth-Related Neurological Injury Compensation Plan, et al. |
Fort Lauderdale, Florida qui tam lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on a False Claims Act violation theory. |
State of Oklahoma v. Mitchell Arlan Homberger and Amy Marie Cobbler |
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal law lawyer represented Defendant, charged with: |
United States of America v. Robert Woody |
Clarksburg, West Virginia criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine. |
Next Page |