United States of America v. Xanthe Lam and Allen Lam |
San Francisco, California criminal law lawyers represented Defendants charged with conspiracy to commit theft of trade secrets and making false statements to a government agency. |
State of Oklahoma v. Lakuan Wyhkeem Redricks, a/k/a Lakuan Washington, and DeJuan Samuel |
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal lawyer represented Defendant, charged with: |
United States of America v. Freeman Celvin, a/k/a "Celvin Freeman" |
New York City, New York criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with fraud and money laundering conspiracy based in the Republic of Ghana (“Ghana”) involving the theft of millions of dollars. |
United States of America v. George Kritopoulos |
Boston, Massachusetts criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged for engaging in a decade-long mortgage fraud scheme involving at least two dozen loan transactions, totaling $6.5 million, that resulted in more than $3.8 million in losses to lenders. |
United States of America v. Intertech Trading Corporation |
Concord, New Hampshire criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with failure to file export information. |
United States of America v. Robert Lee Fisher, William Reece, Kourdae Amerson and Traci Ashford |
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma criminal law lawyer represented Defendants charged with firearm felonies. |
United States of America v. Scott Lowe |
Denver, Colorado criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with possession with intent to distribute methamphetamine, possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. |
United States of America v. Nicholas Jones |
Boise, Idaho criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with wire fraud and falsification of records. |
United States of America v. Eric Meiggs and Declan Harrington |
Boston, Massachusetts United States Attorney’s Office criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit computer fraud and abuse, wire fraud and aggravated identity theft. |
United States of America v. Justin Allen Cunningham |
Portland, Oregon criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1343, which provides: |
United States of America v. Sutter Health |
San Francisco, California civil litigation lawyers represented Defendant charged with violating the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. 3729, which provides: |
United States of America v. Roshanak Khadem, a.k.a. “Roxanne Khadem,” a.k.a. “Roxy Khadem” |
Los Angeles, California criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with conspiring to defraud health insurance companies by causing millions of dollars in fraudulent claims to be submitted to provide patients with “free” cosmetic procedures, including Botox injections, and for cheating on her taxes. |
United States of America v. Abdullahi Ahmed Abdullahi, a/k/a Phish and Fish |
San Diego, California criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2339, which provides: |
United States of America v. Igor Danchenko |
Alexandria, Virginia criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with making false statements in violation of 18 U.S.C. 100, which provides: |
United States of America ex rel. Mahaffey and Brimer v. Carter Healthcare, Stanley Carter and Brad Carter |
Miami, Florida criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with violating the False Claims Act. |
United States of America v. Alejandro Leon |
Spokane, Washington criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(g)(1), 924(a)(2), which provide: |
United States of America v. Kevin Wayne Jones |
Seattle, Washington criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1344, which provides: |
United States of America v. Rhonda Jean Moulder |
Minneapolis, Minnesota criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with mail fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1341, which provides: |
United States of America v. Johnny Blahnik Church |
Cedar Rapids, Iowa criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with with felony possession of a firearm and ammunition in violation of 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(3) and 924(a)(2), which provide: |
United States of America v. Dionneshae Forland |
St.Louis, Missouri criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with coronavirus pandemic fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1343, which provides: |
United States ex rel. GNGH 2, Inc. v. Birdsall Voss & Associates, Inc. |
Milwaukee, Wisconsin civil litigation lawyer represented Defendant accused of violation the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. 3729, which provides: |
United States of America v. George Thacker |
Chattanooga, Tennessee criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1343., which provides: |
United States of America v. Sharika L. Carpenter, et al. |
Memphis, Tennessee criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1343, which provides: |
United States of America v. Douglas William Vance |
Lexington, Kentucky criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with Conspiracy to commit wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §1349, which provides: |
United States of America v. Vania May Bell |
New York City, New York criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with attempt and conspiracy to commit mail fraud. |
Next Page |