Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer Drew Schwartz represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

Houston, Texas personal injury lawyers Kembell Scott Brazil and Robert Warren Painter represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on medical malpractice negligence theories.

McAllen, Texas personal injury lawyers Michael J. Cisneros and Arturo Cisneros represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory.

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer Theodore Michael Hasse represented the Defendant charged with stalking in violation of 18 USC 2261A(1)(B) and 2261(b) and cyberstalking in violation of 18 USC 2261A(2)(B) and 2261(b).

Gretna, LA criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant with appealing, assigning error to the constitutionality of the enhanced sentence and the denial of his subsequent motion to reconsider sentence.
.

Fort Myers, Florida personal injury lawyer Isabel Diaz Barroso represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act Auto Negligence theory.

Boca Raton, Florida personal injury lawyers Paul M. Silva and Peter Joseph Somera, Jr. represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Willmington, Delaware personal injury lawyer Chase Brockstedt who represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.

Under Delaware car/auto accident law, negligent drivers can be held liable and ordered to pay civil damages, i.e., fair and reasona

Criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant with appealing, raising three claims of error: ineffective assistance of counsel, improper limitation on cross-examination, and insufficient evidence to support the verdict

Baton Rouge, Louisiana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with filing a combined motion for new trial and post-verdict judgment of acquittal

Muskogee, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers David Teasdale and
Jacob S. Aldridge, represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

Muskogee, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer L. Grant Gibson represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

Muskogee, Oklahoma insurance law lawyer Brian Brandes represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on bad faith breach of contract theories.

Muskogee, Oklahoma lnsurance law lawyer Amber Peckio Garrett represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a bad faith breach of contract theory.

El Paso, Texas personal injury lawyers Jacobett E. Rivera and Robert Leon Lovett who presented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who used on auto negligence theories.

The following five elements may typically be required to prove negligence: The existence of a legal duty that theendant owed the plaintiff, Defendant’s breach of that duty, Harm to the plaintiff, Defendant’s actions are the proximate cause of harm to the plaintiff, and Defendant’

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer Donald E. Smolen, Sr. represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer Robert Rode represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

The following five elements may typically be required to prove negligence: The existence of a legal duty that theendant owed the plaintiff, Defendant’s breach of that duty

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer Caleb Salmon represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

A plaintiff in Oklahoma whose own negligence contributed to their injury, for instance, will have their damages reduced in proportion. And if the injured party was more neg

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer Matthew Reinstein represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence wrongful death theories.

Marcus Lee Gibson was killed in a car wreck that occurred in Tulsa County on December 4, 2020.


The following five elements may typicall