El Reno, Oklahoma criminal law lawyer represented the Defendant charged with embezzlement in violation of 21 O.S. 1451, which provides:



A. Embezzlement is the fraudulent appropriation of property of any person or legal entity, legally obtained, to any use or purpose not intended or authorized by its owner, or the secretion of the property with the fraudulent intent to appropriat

El Reno, Oklahoma criminal law lawyer represented the Defendant charged with embezzlement of rental property in violation of 21 U.S. 1454(A)(9), which provides:



A. Embezzlement is the fraudulent appropriation of property of any person or legal entity, legally obtained, to any use or purpose not intended or authorized by its owner, or the secretion of the property with the fraudu

Little Rock, Arkansas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Receiving A Firearm While Under Felony Information .

Marion Man Sentenced To 50 Months In Federal Prison For Receiving A Firearm While Under Felony Information

Chicago, Illinois criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with embezzlement.

Former Paralegal for Chicago Law Firm Sentenced to Two Years in Prison for Embezzlement

Columbus, Georgia insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

When businesses enter into contracts, they have an implied duty to act honestly, in good faith, and fairly. When they do not, they can be sued for a breach of this duty. Here, we discuss this duty of good faith and fair dealings and bad faith claims in the business

Columbus, Georgia insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

This case was filed in the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, 22-13916-AA, and was removed to federal court by State Farm.

When businesses enter into contracts, they have an implied duty to act honestly, in good faith, and fairly. When they

Savannah, Georgia personal injury wrongful death lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory seeking compensation for the death of the father of K.E., a minor.

This case was filed in the State Court of Chatham County, STCV22-00211, and was removed to federal court by The Kroger Co.

The state of Georgia defines wrongful death as being the death of a person c

Augusta, Georgia personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory.

BOJ of WNC, LLC is a franchisee for Bojangles' Restaurants, Inc. We are the largest franchisee in the Bojangles system, with nearly 100 locations.

Under the law in Georgia, a tort is an “unlawful violation of a private legal right,” and negligence is one of severa

Savannah, Georgia personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the State Court of Chatham County, STCV20-02299, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Legal Definition of Auto Negligence in Georgia - This duty of care requires drivers to obey traffic laws, keep a lookout for other vehicles, and avoid d

Salt Lake City Utah criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Wire Fraud.

Midvale Man Found Guilty of Wire Fraud While on Pretrial Release, Sentenced to 41 Months’ in Prison

Muskogee, Oklahoma personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability theory.

Premises liability laws in Oklahoma, distinguish between visitors who are invitees, licensees, or trespassers.

A property owner has the highest duty of care to an invitee. An invitee is someone who has been asked to come onto the property by the owner.

Muskogee, Oklahoma personal injury slip and fall lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability theory.

Oklahoma Premises Liability Act

A. For purposes of the Premises Liability Act, the distinction
under the common law between invitees and licensees regarding the
duty owed by an owner or occupier of any premises to such entrants
is abolished.

Muskogee, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.

This was action for wrongful death brought by Plaintiff, Scott Phillips, the surviving spouse of Malinda Phillips, who was killed in a motor vehicle collision on January 26, 2018. Mrs. Phillips was traveling on W. Choctaw Street in Tahlequah while Aram Catron

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Tax Violations.

Restaurant Owner Sentenced to 30 Months’ Imprisonment for Tax Violations That Cost the Government Almost $1.2 Million

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Boulder County District Court, 2023CV30424, and was removed to federal court by Dillon Companies, LLC d/b/a King Soopers which which operates grocery stores in Colorado.

Premises liability is a unique form of a negligence action that holds owners of land r

Las Vegas, Nevada personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Eighth Judicial District Court, A-22-857398-C, and was removed to federal court by 99 Cents Only Stores, LLC.

The civil law of negligence is based upon the concept that a reasonably prudent person should act in a certain way. Negligence

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal law lawyer represented the Defendant, charged with embezzlement between $2,500 and $15,000 in violation of 21 O.S. 1451, which provides:



A. Embezzlement is the fraudulent appropriation of property of any person or legal entity, legally obtained, to any use or purpose not intended or authorized by its owner, or the secretion of the property with the frau

Tacoma, Washington personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Pierce County District Court, 2A733747C, and was removed to federal court by Safway, Inc.

To establish liability against the property owner, you must prove three things: The property owner had a duty to protect you from harm, The prope

Fresno, California insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

This case was filed in the Bakersfield Superior Court, BCV-21-100909, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

An insurance company has a legal duty to uphold its obligations under the terms of the policy. If they fail to do so, they breach the

San Francisco, California insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

An insurance company has a legal duty to uphold its obligations under the terms of the policy. If they fail to do so, they breach the contract and may be liable for damages. A bad-faith breach of contract claim, generally, must be brought within four years

San Jose, California insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

An insurance company has a legal duty to uphold its obligations under the terms of the policy. If they fail to do so, they breach the contract and may be liable for damages. A bad-faith breach of contract claim, generally, must be brought within four years from

Los Angeles, California personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Los Angeles Superior Court, 23STCV22093, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

There are four basic elements of negligence under California state law: duty, breach, causation, and damages. Duty demonstrates the expectation to use reas

Los Angeles, California insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

An insurance company has a legal duty to uphold its obligations under the terms of the policy. If they fail to do so, they breach the contract and may be liable for damages. A bad-faith breach of contract claim, generally, must be brought within four years fr

San Diego, California insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

This case was filed in the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego, 37-02023-0004190-CU-BC-CTL, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

An insurance company has a legal duty to uphold its obligations under the terms of the policy.

Phoenix, Arizona personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was file in the Maricopa County Superior Court, CV2022-091842, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

In Arizona, property owners and occupiers have a duty to protect visitors from injuries arising from known dangers on their property. Whe