Beckley, West Virginia insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

This case was filed in the Raleigh County Circuit Court, 23-C-112, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.


Insurance companies have a duty to treat insured fairly and act in good faith when handling West Virginia insurance claims. Whe

San Francisco, California insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

This case was filed in the San Francisco County Superior Court, CGC-21-597318, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

An insurance company has a legal duty to uphold its obligations under the terms of the policy. If they fail to do so,

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury slip and all lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on premises liability negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, 01-01577, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.


Pennsylvania law holds an individual or company in possession of the land responsible for certain injuries suff

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

The courts have generally defined the term “bad faith” as referring to a “frivolous and unfounded” refusal to pay policy proceeds, involving onduct which imports a dishonest purpose” and involves the breach of the insurer's known duty of good fai

Williamsport, Pennsylvania personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a premises negligence theory.

Pennsylvania law holds an individual or company in possession of the land responsible for certain injuries suffered by people who are on the property. Owners of businesses and owners of private property have a duty to keep their premises in a sa

Scranton, Pennsylvania insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

The courts have generally defined the term “bad faith” as referring to a “frivolous and unfounded” refusal to pay policy proceeds, involving “conduct which imports a dishonest purpose” and involves the breach of the insurer's known duty of good fai

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania personal injury slip and fall claim lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a premises liabllity negligence theory.

Pennsylvania law holds an individual or company in possession of the land responsible for certain injuries suffered by people who are on the property. Owners of businesses and owners of private property have a duty to keep their pr

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

The courts have generally defined the term “bad faith” as referring to a “frivolous and unfounded” refusal to pay policy proceeds, involving “conduct which imports a dishonest purpose” and involves the breach of the insurer's known duty of good f

Albany, New York insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

New York jurisprudence is clear that liability insurers owe their insureds the duty of good faith and fair dealing to act in their insureds best interests in defending and settling claims.

Central Islip, New York insurance lawyer lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

This case was filed in the Supreme Court State of New York, Nassau County, 617757/2022, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

New York jurisprudence is clear that liability insurers owe their insureds the duty of good faith and fair

Central Islip, New York insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

New York jurisprudence is clear that liability insurers owe their insureds the duty of good faith and fair dealing to act in their insureds best interests in defending and settling claims. This duty arises as implied covenants of the contract between the ins

New York City, New York insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on a bad faith breach of contract theory.

"New York jurisprudence is clear that liability insurers owe their insureds the duty of good faith and fair dealing to act in their insureds best interests in defending and settling claims. This duty arises as implied covenants of the contract between the insurer and

New Haven, Connecticut insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of contract theory.

If an insured believes that his insurance company acted in bad faith, he can file a complaint with the Insurance Department. He can also file a civil lawsuit alleging a breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing or tortious bad faith.

If a court

Providence, Rhode Island personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

During the early hours of August 24, 2014, an unidentified group of individuals assaulted Appellant Henry Mu (“Mu”) in the lobby of the Omni Providence Hotel (the “Hotel”), which Appellee Omni Hotels Management Corporation (“Omni”) operates. Mu sued Om

Bangor, Maine Plaintiff sued on a premises liability negligence slip and fall theory.

"Under Maine premises liability law, the owners of buildings and land have a duty to keep their property reasonably free of dangerous conditions that could injure others. This obligation extends to walkways and parking lots owned by or adjacent to the property." Peter Thompson & Associates

Baton Rouge, Louisiana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with tax evasion.

Burlington, Vermont personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on premises liability negligence theories.

Plaintiff Richard Grajeda brings this negligence action against Vail Resorts Inc., Vail Resorts Management Company, and Okemo Limited Liability Company (collectively, “Defendants”), seeking damages for injuries he sustained in a collision with a snowmaking station

Burlington, Vermont personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

The elements of a personal injury auto negligence claimed are a duty of due care, breach of that duty that directly causes the injuries and damages suffered by the Plaintiff.

Pocatello, Idaho personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory.

Premises liability is almost always controlled by the law of negligence, and it's usually seen in the context of injuries resulting from dangerous conditions on property that aren't remedied or warned of. The owner or occupier who controls property owes a du

Billings, Montana personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

Premises liability describes legal claims that can result from a dangerous condition on another person or business's property. The most common claims are slips and falls; however, many aspects can fall under this element of the law.

The elements of a personal inj

Butte, Montana personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Montana Fifth Judicial District Court, DV-29-02022-79, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

The elements on a personal injury claim in Montana are duty of care, failure to exercise due care, damage, and a direct casual link.

Great Falls, Montana personal injury law truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiffs on auto negligence theories.

Montana negligence laws follow the doctrine of modified comparative negligence. This means that a plaintiff can't be more than 51 percent negligent or responsible for the injury, or they will be barred from recovery.

The elements on a personal injury claim are duty

Las Vegas, Nevada personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Eighth Judicial District Court, A-22-852222-C, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

The basic principles of premises liability are: A property owner has a duty to keep their property safe for entrants. However, they do not

Phoenix, Arizona personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

The elements of an auto negligence claim are duty of care, negligence, causation, and damages.

Negligence is the failure to comply with the applicable standard of care: the requisite standard of conduct objective.

Austin, Texas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

This case was filed in the 368TH Judicial District Court of Williamson County, 23-00532-C368, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

What Are The 5 Elements of Negligence in Texas?

Duty. According to Texas law, negligence cases are determined by the presence