Tulsa, Oklahoma insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant bad faith breach of contract theory.

A bad faith insurance claim arises when an insurance company unreasonably denies your claim or refuses to pay you the funds that you are entitled to receive under your policy based upon some unreasonable justification.

In every contract in Oklahoma, there is

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on product liability theories.

This case was filed in the Tulsa Cty Dist Ct, CJ-20-03184, and was removed to federal court.

Plaintiffs alleged that that that John Cade underwent a knee replacement surgery performed by Dr. Chistian P. Luessenhop on November 11, 2013. A Stryker knee, which wa

Tulsa, Oklahoma insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

This case was filed in the Washington Cty Dist Ct, CJ-22-00037, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

The claims made and defenses asserted by the parties are not available for this report.

A bad faith insurance claim ari

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

A negligence claim requires that the person bringing the claim (the plaintiff) establish four distinct elements: duty of care, breach, causation, and damages.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory.

A negligence claim requires that the person bringing the claim (the plaintiff) establish four distinct elements: duty of care, breach, causation, and damages.

Stillwater, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

A negligence claim requires that the person bringing the claim (the plaintiff) establish four distinct elements: duty of care, breach, causation, and damages.

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

A negligence claim requires that the person bringing the claim (the plaintiff) establish four distinct elements: duty of care, breach, causation, and damages.

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

A negligence claim requires that the person bringing the claim (the plaintiff) establish four distinct elements: duty of care, breach, causation, and damages.

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a auto negligence theories.

A negligence claim requires that the person bringing the claim (the plaintiff) establish four distinct elements: duty of care, breach, causation, and damages.

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

Plaintiff claimed that he was injured in a car wreck that occurred in Lincoln County, Oklahoma on September 7, 2018.

A negligence claim requires that the person bringing the claim (the plaintiff) establish four distinct elements: duty of care, breach, causation,

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

A negligence claim requires that the person bringing the claim (the plaintiff) establish four distinct elements: duty of care, breach, causation, and damages.

Urbana, Illinois personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a product liability theories.

Eisai, Inc. is a pharmaceutical company that produces and sells drugs used to treat neurological disorders.

The manufacture and/or sellers on products have a duty to avoid selling defective and unreasonably dangerous products.

Urbana, Illinois personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a product liability theories.

The manufacture and distributors of goods have a duty to avoid designing, manufacturing and/or selling defective and unreasonably dangerous products in Illinois.

"Sanofi US is comprised of four business units: Specialty Care, Vaccines, General Medicines, and

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Tax Fraud.

Defendants Concealed More than $8 Million in Sales and Paid Employees “Off the Books” for Over a Decade

East St. Louis, Illinois personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a product liability theories.

A manufacturer has a duty to design against reasonably foreseeable hazards. To show that the manufacturer acted unreasonably based on the foreseeability of harm, the plaintiff must show the manufacturer knew or should have known of the risk posed by the produc

Honolulu, Hawaii criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Drug Trafficking and Weapons Possession.

Anchorage, Alaska criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with interfering with flight crew on Anchorage flight.

Chicago, Illinois personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court of Will County, Illinois, 23-LA-674 and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Illinois auto negligence law governs how liability and damages are determined in car accidents. Here's a breakdown of its k

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with for Tax Fraud.

Defendants Concealed More than $8 Million in Sales and Paid Employees “Off the Books” for Over a Decade

New York City, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Defrauding Union’s Annuity Fund.

Concord, New Hampshire criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Failure to Register as a Sex Offender.

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Assaulting Federal Immigration Officers.

Indianapolis, Indiana personal injury slip and fall lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a personal injury premises liability theory.

This case was filed in the Marion County Superior Court 6, 49D06-2209-CT-032977, and was removed to federal court by Wal-Mart.

Premises liability law in Indiana protects individuals from injuries sustained on another person's

New Albany, Indiana personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented the Plaintiff who used the Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Clark Superior Court #6, 10D06-2301-CT-000008, and was removed to federal court by Target.

Indiana Premises Liability Law:

Premises liability law in Indiana protects individuals from injuries susta

Indianapolis, Indiana personal injury car wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Marion County Superior Court, 49D05-2202-CT-00407, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Indiana personal injury negligence law:

Elements of a Negligence Claim:

To successfully file a pers