First Amendment Law
Juan Ramon Atilano, Annette Pricilla Diaz, Erika Nicole Romero as Next Friend of Marissa Danielle Atilano and Julian Andrew Atilano, and as Represenative of the Estate of Juan Daniel Atilano, Deceased v. Tom Green County, Texas

Austin, Texas – Civil rights lawyer represented plaintiff claiming his constitutional rights were violated.

“Whether a court has subject matter jurisdiction is a question of law.” Texas
Dep’t of Parks & Wildlife v. Miranda, 133 S.W.3d 217, 226 (Tex. 2004). A plea to the
jurisdiction seeks to establis... More...
   $0 (09-23-2022 - TX)

5th and West Owner, L.P., and Joshua Needham v. Daryn Wasek and Donald Wasek

Austin, Texas – Real Estate lawyer represented Appellees with a fraud and negligent misrepresentation claim.

5th and West is the developer of a residential condominium building in downtown Austin. In December of 2017, the Waseks signed a contract to purchase a unit in the building, which was then in the early stages ... More...
   $0 (09-22-2022 - TX)

Zachary Myers and Dart Frog, LLC v. Tahitian Village Property Owners Association, Inc.; and Tahitian Village Architectural Control Committee

Austin, Texas – Real Estate lawyer represented Appellants with a breach of the restrictive covenants suit.

Myers owns a lot in the Tahitian Village subdivision. Dart Frog, a Texas limited
liability company that Myers alleged is “one of his companies,” owns six lots in the same
subdivision. In September 2020, Myer... More...
   $0 (09-22-2022 - TX)

David Polston; Inland Environmental and Remediation, Inc.; Inland Recycling, L.L.C.; and Boundary Ventures, Inc. v. The State of Texas, Lower Colorado River Authority, and Colorado County, Texas

Austin, Texas – Environmental Litigation lawyer represented Appellants with appealing from an injunction to operate a waste-processing facility.

Polston is the president of Inland Environmental and Remediation, Inland
Recycling, and Boundary Ventures. Appellants own and/or operate a waste-processing facility
tha... More...
   $0 (09-22-2022 - TX)

Texas Health Harris Methodist Hospital Fort Worth v. Stephen Featherly

Fort Worth, Texas Personal Injury lawyer represented Defendant challenging hospital’s lien.

In this case, a hospital filed a statutory lien against an emergency room patient’s
personal injury cause of action, and the patient brought this declaratory judgment action
to challenge the validity of the hospital’s lien... More...
   $0 (09-20-2022 - TX)

Elbert Franklin v. The State of Texas Child Sexual Predator

Fort Worth, Texas – Criminal Defense lawyer represented defendant with a indecency with a child by contact charge.

The indictment alleged that Franklin had committed the offense of continuous
sexual abuse of a child, a first-degree felony punishable by imprisonment in the
penitentiary for life or for any... More...
   $0 (09-19-2022 - TX)

United States of America v. Jon J. Kahen

Brooklyn, New York criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with money laundering for his role as the owner and operator of a voice over internet protocol (VoIP) company that facilitated and profited from the introduction of fraudulent robocall traffic into the United States.

Jon J. Kahen, 48, of Great Neck, New York, was the owner and chief executive officer of Global Voicecom ... More...
   $0 (09-16-2022 - NY)

The State of Ohio v. OMalley

Medina, Ohio criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with DUI.

In this case, we are asked two separate questions about R.C.
4511.19(G)(1)(c)(v) and Ohio’s criminal-forfeiture scheme for vehicles owned and
used by repeat drunk drivers. First, we are asked whether that scheme violates the
Equal Protection Clauses in the state and federal Constitutions by treatin... More...
   $0 (09-15-2022 - OH)

T & T Engineering Services, Inc. v. Jordan Danks

Houston, Texas – Personal Injury lawyer represented Appellee with a strict products liability and negligence suit.

On November 7, 2018, Jordan Danks was working as a derrickman on Patterson-UTI Drilling Company Rig 811, allegedly designed, fabricated, or manufactured by T&T Engineering and TEBJES, Inc. d/b/a Basic... More...
   $0 (09-15-2022 - TX)

Wade Harrell Thomson v. The State of Texas

Houston, Texas – Criminal Defense lawyer represented defendant with a possession of child pornography charges.

Deputy M. Payne stopped Thomson for a routine traffic violation at almost
midnight on a Monday night. Thomson—who was over 40 years old—had a
young, female passenger in his car. Deputy Payne thought the ... More...
   $0 (09-14-2022 - TX)

Robert Hardie Tibaut Bowman and Powers L. Bowman v. Molly Bowman Stephens

Houston, Texas – Real Estate lawyer represented Appellants with challenging a judgment to force a partition by sale of lake property.

This appeal is from the second stage of a partition proceeding. In the first
stage, this Court affirmed the trial court’s judgment that a partition in kind was
feasible and that Step... More...
   $0 (09-14-2022 - TX)

The State of Texas v. Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. dba Wharton; and Wharton County Foods, LLC

Houston, Texas – Business Litigation lawyer represented defendant with an interlocutory appeal concerning the sale of eggs during the beginning of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Cal-Maine Foods, Inc. is the largest producer and marketer of shell eggs in
the United States. The company is a conglomerate comprised of its own operati... More...
   $0 (09-13-2022 - TX)


Houston, Texas – Personal Injury lawyer represented Appellant with appealing an adverse jury verdict arising from an automobile collision.

Guerrero and Cardenas were involved in an automobile collision at Antoine
Street and North Sam Houston Parkway in Houston in August 2016. Guerrero was
driving southbound on A... More...
   $0 (09-12-2022 - TX)


Topeka, Kansas – Disability lawyer represented Appellant with seeking to relocate to a community based treatment center.

A case is moot when it is clearly and convincingly shown the actual controversy
has ended, the only judgment that could be entered would be ineffectual for any purpose,
and it would not impa... More...
   $0 (09-09-2022 - KS)

Heather De Mian v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, et al.

St. Louis, Missouri civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on a 42 U.S.C. 1983 prisoner civil rights violation theory.

This case arises out of a protest that occurred in St. Louis, Missouri following the acquittal of former St. Louis Metropolitan Police Department (“SLMPD”) Officer Jason Stockley in the shooting death of Anthony Lamar Smith. At one of the... More...
   $0 (09-06-2022 - MO)

United States of America v. James Wesley Frazier, Aelix Santiago, Michael Forrester, Jamei Hern Dereck, Leighton Stanley, William Boylston and Jason Meyerholz

Nashville, Tennessee criminal defense lawyers represented Defendants charged with engaging in a conspiracy to distribute and to possess with intent to distribute drugs, racketeering activity, and money laundering.

After the testimony of almost 100 witnesses, with less than two days left in the Government's case-in-chief, and with Defendants' case expected to last less than a day, fiv... More...
   $0 (09-05-2022 - TN)

Lonnie Olmetti v. Kent County

Grand Rapids, Michigan personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on civil rights violation theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983.

Plaintiff was a pre-trial detainee in the Kent County Correctional Facility (KCCF) when he fell from an upper bunk and suffered several injuries. During a prior incarceration, Sherwood assigned Plaintiff to a lower-bunk detail due to acute... More...
   $0 (09-03-2022 - MI)

Stephen DiChiara v. The Town of Salem and The New Hampshire Attorney General

Concord, New Hampshire civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants for violating his civil rights in various ways.

Stephen DiChiara brings this action against the Town of Salem and the State of New Hampshire.[1] In his complaint, DiChiara advances a variety of claims under the United States Constitution, the New Hampshire Constitution, and New Hampshire common law. He s... More...
   $0 (08-30-2022 - nh)

Mark Campbell and Sherrie Campbell v. Cheatham County Sheriff's Department, et al.

Nashville, Tennessee civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants claiming excessive use of force.

On August 21, 2018, around 9:15 p.m., Fox and Austin were dispatched to the
Campbells’ residence to conduct a welfare check after a 9-1-1 dispatcher received two hang-up
calls from a phone located on the property. They arrived at the Campbells’ home around 9:39... More...
   $0 (08-29-2022 - TN)

Kari Lake, et al. v. Katie Hobbs, et al.

Phoenix, Arizona civil litigation lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on civil rights violation theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983.

Plaintiffs allege that the United States' transition to electronic systems and computer technology for voting has “created unjustified new risks of hacking, election tampering, and electronic voting fraud.” (Doc. 3, First Amended Complaint... More...
   $0 (08-26-2022 - AZ)

People of the State of Michigan v. Donnevan Lee Coppernoll

Detroit, Michigan criminal lawyer represented Defendant charged with drug possession.

The testimony at the preliminary examination established the following facts. On July 29, 2020, Police Officer Anthony Williams, who had been employed with the Detroit Police Department for about four years at the time, observed a vehicle apparently speeding on a residential street near Joy and Long... More...
   $0 (08-25-2022 - MI)

Debra R. Thompson v. State of Delaware Department of Services for Children, et al.

Wilmington, Delaware civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violations of her right to due process and under state law against the State of Delaware Department of Services for Children, Youth and their Families (“DSCYF”) and several individual defendants after Thompson was demoted and eventually terminated from DSCYF. The District Court dism... More...   $0 (08-22-2022 - DE)

Gennadiy Nekrilov, et al. v. City of Jersey City

Newark, New Jersey civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued defendant under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 challenging a Jersey City ordinancecurtailing the ability of property owners and lease holders to operate short-term rentals. The plaintiffs alleged that, having passed an earlier zoning ordinance legalizing short-term rentals in Jersey City (the “City”), which enticed them to invest in p... More...   $0 (08-21-2022 - NJ)

United States of America v. Aaron Mithcell Johnson

Norfolk, Virginia criminal lawyer represented Defendant charged with felony possession of a firearm.

Defendant has moved to suppress the evidence obtained by officers during their warrantless search of Defendant's car on September 23, 2021, and any evidence obtained as the result of Defendant's subsequent seizure, including a firearm seized from Defendant's person, and an extended magazin... More...
   $0 (08-19-2022 - VA)

Crawford Jordan-A, Chief Justice ex rel. Jordan Alexander Crawford v. United States of America, et al.

Plaintiff Crawford: Jordan-A brings this action to declare that he is a member of the Yamassee Native Americans of the Creek Nation; that as a tribal member, he is not a citizen of the United States, of any State, or of any local municipality; that he is governed by divine law and not the man-made laws of any nation, State, or municipality; and that therefore any documents, contracts, or instrumen... More...   $0 (08-19-2022 - MO)

Next Page

Find a Lawyer


Find a Case