Plaintiff-Appellant Greg Kuebel appeals from a judgment of the United States District 12 Court for the Western District of New York (Telesca, J.) granting summary judgment for 13 Defendant-Appellee Black & Decker (U.S.) Inc. (“B&D�). Kuebel sues on behalf of himself and 14 other similarly situated current and former B&D employees, asserting three sets of claims under 15 the Fair Labor Standard

Acting on a tip from a concerned citizen, the Wage and Hour Division of the U.S. Department of Labor commenced an investigation into potential child labor violations committed by Laurelbrook Sanitarium and School, Inc. (“Laurelbrookâ€�). After concluding that Laurelbrook had violated the child labor provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (“FLSAâ€� or “Actâ

{1} Worker Jesus Gonzalez appeals the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) denying him modifier benefits from his employer Performance Painting, Inc. (Employer) under NMSA 1978, Section 52-1-26(C) (1990), of the New Mexico Workers’ Compensation Act (the Act), NMSA 1978, §§ 52-1-1 to -70 (1929, as amended through 2007). The WCJ denied modifier benefits because Worker’s undocume

Applebee's International, Inc. (Applebee's) brings this interlocutory appeal from the district court's1 denial of summary judgment in this employment wage dispute. Gerald A. Fast, Talisha Cheshire, and Brady Gehrling represent a class of 5,543 individuals (collectively "the employees") who are current and former servers and bartenders at Applebee's restaurants. They brought suit under the Fair Lab

This is a collective action brought under 29 U.S.C. § 216(b) by current and former employees (collectively, the Employees) of the defendant City of Albuquerque, New Mexico (the City), alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (FLSA). The FLSA generally requires employers to compensate overtime hours at one and one-half times an employee’s “regular rate� o

In these appeals, we consider whether certain on-site housing costs of seasonal farm workers can be credited toward the minimum wage set by Oregon statute. Under the circumstances presented by this case, we conclude that they may not. We also conclude that the workers in this case were entitled to be paid on the last workday, rather than the following day. 4988 BOBADILLA-GERMAN v. BEAR CREEK
<

Plaintiffs, representing a class of former employees of Emery Worldwide Airlines, Inc. (EWA), appeal from the entry of judgment in favor of defendants EWA and its parent company CNF Corporation on claims brought under the Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act of 1988 (WARN Act), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2101-2109. Plaintiffs’ principal claim is that the district court erred in finding, at the

Appellant James Purdham is employed as a safety and security assistant by the Fairfax County, Virginia, School Board. Purdham filed this action asserting that the School Board failed to pay him overtime wages for his services as the coach of a high school golf team, and thereby violated the Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA" or "Act"), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. After the close of discovery, the distr

Plaintiffs-Appellants Michael Christopher and Frank Buchanan appeal the judgment of the district court that they are not entitled to overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. Plaintiffs were employed as Pharmaceutical Sales Representatives (PSRs) for Defendant-Appellee SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline (Glaxo). Glaxo classified Pl

The primary question presented in this appeal is whether the district court erred in holding that the contents of a particular letter from defense counsel to counsel for the plaintiffs, as clarified by a follow-up letter from defense counsel thirteen days later, rendered moot the plaintiffs’ claims for unpaid overtime wages in a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S

John Desmond, Dana Witherspoon, and M. Larry Sanders (collectively "appellants" or "former employees") appeal from an award of unpaid overtime compensation in their case under the Fair Labor Standards Acts ("FLSA") against their former employer, PNGI Charles Town Gaming, L.L.C., d/b/a Charles Town Races & Slots ("Charles Town Gaming" or "employer").

The former employees dispute how the di

Upon consideration of Plaintiff-Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing, we vacate the prior opinion in this case, issued on September 21, 2010 and published at 620 F.3d 1272 (11th Cir. 2010), and substitute the following opinion in its place. In this opinion, we revise footnote six, but do not change the opinion in any other respect. Accordingly, Plaintiff-Appellant’s petition for panel rehe

In this appeal we consider whether employees who institute a collective action against their employer under the terms of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (“FLSA�), may at the same time litigate supplemental state-law claims as a class action certified according to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(b)(3). The district court thought not; it rejected the

The primary question presented in this appeal is whether the district court erred in holding that the contents of a particular letter from defense counsel to counsel for the plaintiffs, as clarified by a follow-up letter from defense counsel thirteen days later, rendered moot the plaintiffs’ claims for unpaid overtime wages in a collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S

¶1 Plaintiff/Appellant, Perry L. Jones, III (Employee), seeks review of the trial court's order granting summary judgment in favor of Defendant/Appellee, OS Restaurant Services, Inc. (Restaurant), in Employee's action for underpayment of minimum wage. At issue is whether Restaurant is an employer as defined in the Oklahoma Minimum Wage Act, 40 O.S.2001 §197.4(d). We hold the statute excludes Emp

Isabel Diaz (“Diaz�) filed a lawsuit against Jaguar Restaurant Group, LLC, Jagmar Management Group, LLC, Jagmar Brands, LLC 1, and Eduardo Durazo (collectively, “Jaguar�), her former employer, for unpaid overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA�), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201–216. During trial, the district court allowed Jaguar to amend its Answer pursuant to Federal Rule of Ci

Plaintiffs-appellants Gamal Hanna, Nivine Elsharouny, Subhash Naik, and the Estate of Paulette Hamilton1 appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Denny Chin, Judge), dismissing, with prejudice, their complaint against defendants-appellees Scott O’Neill and the City of New York. Plaintiffs brought suit for employment discrimination under Ti

New York City and the New York City Police Department appeal from an order of United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Scheindlin, J.) entered on March 21, 2008, and amended on April 10, 2008, preliminarily enjoining them from investigating and disciplining Plaintiff-Appellees based upon Plaintiff-Appellees’ testimony or participation in this lawsuit. We conclude that

The City of New York appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Scheindlin, J.) awarding Thomas P. Puccio attorney’s fees pursuant to section 216(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Puccio cross-appeals. Because the district court did not explain the basis on which Puccio was excepted from the requirement that attorneys submit contemporaneous

When an employer changes its shift schedule to accommodate its employees’ scheduling desires, the employer may reduce the employee pay rate to pay its employees the same wages they received under the former schedule, so long as the rate reduction was not designed to circumvent the provisions (including overtime) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA�).

1. BACKGROUND

Pomona Val

This case concerns the City of Oakland’s (“City�) policy requiring police officers to repay a portion of their training costs if they voluntarily leave the City’s employment before completing five years of service. Plaintiff-appellant Courtney Gordon was a police officer for the City who left her position after less than two years. She alleges that the City violated the minimum wage provis

In this procedurally convoluted case, plaintiffs seek overtime wages they contend they were unlawfully denied by their employer. The plaintiffs apparently initially intended this case to be a nationwide “collective action� under § 216(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA�), 29 U.S.C. § 216(b), through which employees seeking to recover under FLSA’s substantive provisions may asser

Appellants Abatement Incorporated and Alan Manring[1] appeal from the trial court’s judgment, entered after a jury trial, holding them jointly and severally liable for breach of an employment agreement with appellee Kyle Williams. In nine issues, Abatement and Manring argue that judgment was improper because the contract was unenforceable under the statute of frauds, the terms were too indefini

Virginia Kinney refused a Rule 68 offer of judgment ($17,000) from her former employer whom she had sued on several grounds. She received a partial judgment for over $5,600 for an FLSA violation (and attorneys fees), then went to a bench trial on claims for discrimination and contract breach and lost. The court entered final judgment on the merits and subsequently denied her Rule 59 motions and gr

A group of hotel workers present in this country under H-2B visas (“the 2 Workers�) sued Decatur Hotels and Patrick Quinn (collectively “Decatur�) alleging violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA�). Decatur moved to dismiss and for summary judgment, and the Workers moved for partial summary judgment. In a single order, the district court granted the Workers’ motion in part