Philadelphia, Pennsylvania constitutional law lawyer represented the Plaintiff in challenging the constitutionality of the federal "felon-in-possession" law—18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)—violates his Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.

The material facts are undisputed. In 1995, Range pleaded guilty in the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County to one count of making a false st

Los Angeles, California criminal defense lawyer represented Steven Duarte, aka Shorty.

Duarte was convicted of possessing a firearm after being convicted of two non-violent felonies: vandalism and evading a peace officer.

The law that Duarte was convicted under, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), prohibits anyone with a felony conviction from possessing a firearm.

Duart

Visalia, California criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with filing a false report.

On January 15, 2020, the Tulare County District Attorney's Office filed a 48-count indictment, charging defendant with filing a false report (§ 118.1; counts 1, 5, 6, 9, 12, 15, 17, 19, 22, 24, 26, 28, 29, 31, 34, 37); conspiracy to commit a crime of perjury (§§ 182, subd. (a)(1),

Benton, Kentucky criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charge with enhanced trafficking in various controlled substances as well as for being a convicted felon in possession of a handgun.

On August 18, 2021, Kentucky State Police (KSP) Trooper William Propes was notified by KSP Lieutenant Dean Patterson that KSP had been contacted by a FedEx facility in Paducah regarding a su

Columbia, Kentucky criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with DUI.

Anthony Tyler Thompson, Brandon Scott Carroll, and Gregory Tanner Caldwell (collectively referred to as Appellants) have been granted discretionary review from opinions and orders of the Marion Circuit Court affirming the denial of their motions to suppress evidence obtained from breath tests administ

Annapolis, Maryland criminal defense attorney represented the Defendant charged with illegal possession of a regulated firearm after being convicted of a disqualifying crime.

On January 22, 2022, police officers were called to investigate a shooting outside of 450 Fontana Court, Glen Burnie, Maryland, 21061 ("residence"). After police arrived at the residence, an officer noticed the Appel

Detroit, Michigan personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories un 42 U.S.C. 1983.

When Glorianna Moore refused to show her license to Officer Brian Wilson at a traffic stop, he opened her car door and grabbed her arm. Because Moore started screaming and twisting her body away, Officer Wilson restrained her by holding her arm a

Camden, New Jersey breach of contract lawyers represented the parties in s litigation arises out of the purchase of a Red Roof Inn in Mount Laurel, New Jersey. In or about August of 2014, plaintiff Amit Shah made an offer for the purchase of the Red Roof Inn in Mount Laurel, New Jersey. The purchase offer for the sum of $4.5 million dollars required a $100,000 non-refundable deposit.

* *

Scranton, Pennsylvania criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with being a felons in possession of a firearms.

Defendants were indicted for felony possession of a firearm.

The District Court acknowledged that Quailes and Harper “may have violated the conditions of [their] state parole by possessing the firearm,” but it reasoned that this “does not prove

Owensboro, Kentucky condemnation lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on violation of due process theory.

The City of Madisonville condemned one of several mobile homes that Michael and Rebecca McIntosh own in their Kentucky town. The City demolished the property a month later. The McIntoshes filed this § 1983 action in response, alleging that the City deprived them of their due pro

Portland, Maine criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with felony possession of a firearm.

Dario Giambro appeals his conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), the felon-in-possession
statute, on two grounds. First, Giambro argues that the district court erred in denying his motion to suppress evidence found by police officers after they forcibly entered his Hebron,

Monet, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a negligence claims.

First Baptist Chruch of Pierce City, Missouri, is a Southern Baptist church and that Plaintiff participated in FBC's youth ministries program. A youth pastor led FBC's youth ministries program and transported participants, including Plaintiff and others, to and from said program in a church van. On tw

Canton, Ohio criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with one count of child endangering pursuant to R.C. 2919.22(A) and (E)(2)(b), a felony of the fourth degree [Count I] and one count of drug possession pursuant to R.C. 2925.11(A) and (C), a misdemeanor of the first degree. Appellant entered pleas of not guilty and the matter proceeded to trial by jury. Prior to trial, appella

Lafayette, Louisiana civil litigation lawyers represented the parties in a breach of contract action.

The Garys sustained extensive roof damage when Humcane Delta blew through Lafayette Parish on October 9, 2020. The following day, the Garys met with a representative from Hollier Roofing. During this meeting, the Garys and Hollier Roofing signed an agreement to fix the damage. The agreeme

Topeka, KS criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant with claiming a jury instruction contained an alternative-means error

Topeka, KS criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant with claiming the district court abused its discretion.

San Bernardino, California condemnation lawyers represented the parties in an eminent domain action.

The Town of Apple Valley (TAV) sought to condemn via eminent domain a private water utility system. In November 2015, TAV passed two resolutions of necessity (RON) to acquire the water system, which was then owned by Carlyle Infrastructures Partners and operated by Apple Valley Ranchos Wa

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with unlawful possession of controlled drugs in violation of 63 O.S. 2-420, which provides:

A. 1. It shall be unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally to possess a controlled dangerous substance unless such substance was obtained directly, or pursuant to a valid prescription or order from a practitioner,

Tiffin, Ohio criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with sexual felonies.

This case originated on December 21, 2022, when a Seneca County grand jury returned an indictment against Kimble, charging him as follows: Count 1 - Rape, a first-degree felony in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b); Count 2 -Rape, a first-degree felony in violation of R.C. 2907.02(A)(1)(b); Count

Alexandria, Virginia criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendant charged with three counts
of brandishing a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A)(ii).

For his participation in an unsuccessful robbery during which his accomplice shot a man, respondent Justin Taylor faced charges of violating the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1

Portland, Oregon constitutional law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who challenged Oregon's privacy law.

Project Veritas and Project Veritas Action Fund (collectively, “Project Veritas”) argue that an Oregon
statute prohibiting unannounced recordings of oral conversations violates the First Amendment. Project Veritas
brings as-applied and facial challenges. It contends that

Cedar Rapids, Iowa criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with being a felony in possession of a firearm.

Joshua Faust pleaded guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, see 18
U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), preserving his right to appeal the district court’s1 denial of his
motion to dismiss the felon-in-possession charge. He was sentenced to 84 months’
i

San Antonio, Texas civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the defendant on unlawful seizure, First Amendment retailaition, and excessive force theories.

David Bailey and his friends went to downtown San Antonio to “film the police.” With cameras rolling, they approached Officers Oscar Ramos and Christopher Dech, who were guarding an ambulance. An altercation ensued, a

Dallas, Texas employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a breach of contract theory.

Clay County Memorial Hospital (“CCMH”) is among Texas’s last
county-owned hospitals. It operates under the oversight of the Clay County
Commissioners’ Court, which appoints a Board of Managers to govern the
hospital’s operations pursuant to Chapter 263 of the Texas

Mountain Home, Idaho criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with second-degree murder.

niel Ruiz Ortiz appeals from his convictions for second-degree murder and a violation of a no contact order, alleging that the district court erred when it denied his motion to suppress evidence discovered during a warrantless search of his home and during a subsequent search conducte