Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

Possession of a firearm AFCF in violation of 21 O.S.C. 1283, which provide:

A. Except as provided in subsection B of this section, it shall be unlawful for any person convicted of any felony in any court of this state or of another state or of the United States to have in his or her possession or un

Denver, Colorado criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with 21 U.S.C. § 841
(possession with intent to distribute), 21 U.S.C. § 843(b) (use of a telephone in the
commission of a felony drug offense), and 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A) (possession of a
firearm in furtherance of a drug offense).

* * *

The Fourth Amendment allows judges to issue search

Seattle, Washington civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a prisoner civil rights violation claim.

* * *

Prisoner civil rights laws protect inmates from violations of their constitutional rights while incarcerated. These laws safeguard against cruel and unusual punishment, discrimination, and denial of due process. Key areas of protection include freedom from excessiv

Madison, Wisconsin criminal defense lawyer represented the Plaintiff seeking postconviction relief.

Curtis Walker has served 30 years of his life sentence for a murder that he committed when
he was 17 years old. The state trial judge in Walker’s case exercised the discretion conferred upon him by Wisconsin law
to set Walker’s parole eligibility date for 2071. Walker will notbe

Nashville, Tennessee civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff claiming due process violations.

In their class-action complaint against the members of Tennessee’s Board of Parole, plaintiffs allege that Tennessee’s use of a computer test to determine parole eligibility violated their constitutional right to due process. The district court found that plaintiffs failed to state a pl

Grand Rapids, Michigan criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with felony possession of a firearm.

On an evening in May 2023, Grand Rapids Police Department Detective Garza was
involved in an on-duty car accident. The cars collided near the intersection of College Avenue
and Dickinson Street, in a neighborhood that was notorious for narcotics and stolen vehicle

El Paso, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of a firearm while being an unlawful user of a controlled substance, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3).

On April 30, 2021, law enforcement officers stopped a vehicle being driven by Sanchez after a license plate search showed it was stolen. While searching Sanchez, they found a gun, suspected Xan

New York City, New York civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff claiming that his Second Amendment rights were violated.

Appellant, who was convicted of a nonviolent financial felony, brings a Second Amendment and Fifth Amendment challenge to the felon-in-possession law, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), which prohibits convicted felons from possessing firearms. He argues that because he was

Concord, New Hampshire civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an 8th Amendment violation theory.

Waltermeyer's operative complaint alleges he received inadequate medical treatment while incarcerated at the Federal
Correctional Institute in Berlin, New Hampshire from May 2018 through July 2019. Afterwards, he was transferred to a different federal correctional facility, FCC C

Atlanta, Georgia criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with felony possession of a firearm.

The Supreme Court requires appeallate courts to decide whether United States v. Rahimi, 144 S. Ct. 1889 (2024),
abrogated our decision in United States v. Rozier, 598 F.3d 768, 770–71 (11th Cir. 2010), upholding the federal law that bars felons from possessing firearms and

Macon, Georgia civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who claimed his Fourth, Eighth,
and Fourteenth Amendment rights were violated.

The Plaintiff claimed that his probation was wrongfully revoked and he was held for 104 days.

The state court did not revoke Gervin’s probation. It concluded that the State had failed to meet its burden to show that
Gervin violated

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(9).

The Defendant claimed that 922(g) violates the Second Amendment.

Dallas, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with abusive sexual contact.

Tulsa man was convicted of abusive sexual contact after groping a woman on a flight.

Wagoner, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with contributing to the delinquency of a minor and obstructing an officer.

Deputies were dispatched to the Defendant's home on a noise complaint. The deputies did not have and arrest warrant, nor did they have a warrant to search her home or the curtilage of the home. The deputies entered the Defendant's home w

Jackson, Mississippi criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of a
firearm after a felony conviction in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1).

In 2018, Marcus Delars Branson was convicted of bank robbery in Texas and sentenced to a thirty-seven-month term of imprisonment to be followed by a three-year term of supervised release. Branson was released in

Gulfport, Mississippi criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with cyberstalking in violation of 18 U.S.C.§ 2261A(2)(B).

The First Amendment protects speech that provokes, disturbs, or even offends. That is, after all, “the theory of our Constitution.”1 But speech that threatens real harm crosses a different line.

Jubert was charged with one count of cybers

Houston, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with felony possession of a firearm.

The Defendant claimed that 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) violates the Second Amendment.

MoreLaw was created to help people find experienced lawyers to represent them in the more than 3,144 counties across the United States. Click the link above to see a list of lawyers ready an

Davenport, Iowa personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on medical malpractice theories.

In 2014, Fatima Belhak and her husband were expecting their first child. When Belhak went into labor, she and her husband went to Trinity Medical Center in Bettendorf, where Belhak had been seeing an obstetrician named Dr. Mona Alqulali. But because Alqulali was unavailable, anothe

Newark, New Jersey civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who on a First Amendment Free Exercise Clause violation and Title VII.

Smith believes men should grow and maintain beards based on the teachings of Holy Scripture and early Christian theologians. Beards, Smith says, emulate Jesus Christ and the biblical prophets; they are symbols of masculinity, maturity, and man’s natura

Orlando, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with trafficking in ten grams or more of dimethylpentylone and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon.

Three police officers, including Officer Michael Collazo, were patrolling an area in Orlando known for narcotics and firearms transactions. They first saw Simpson standing outside his car at a gas station

Newark, New Jersey criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant who was charged with possession of marijuana.

On the evening of December 31, 2020, four plainclothes police officers in unmarked cars patrolled a high-crime area in Newark. One of the officers, Detective Marc Castro, testified that on this patrol, he spotted a parked, running Audi that had its sunroof open and "heavy af

Los Angeles, California civil rights lawyers represented the parties in a 42 U.S.C. 1983.

Christopher and Kimberly Garnier brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit challenging the actions of Michelle
O’Connor-Ratcliff and T.J. Zane, members of the Poway Unified School District (“PUSD” or “the District”) Board of Trustees. O’Connor-Ratcliff and Zane (collectively referred to as

New York, New York international trade lawyers presented the Plaintiff who challenged the validity of the tariffs levied by President Trump.

A. The Constitution
While “Congress . . . may not transfer to another branch powers which are strictly and
exclusively legislative . . . Congress . . . may confer substantial discretion . . . to implement and
enforce the laws.” Gundy

Boston, Massachusetts civil litigation lawyers represented the parties in a First Amendment Constitutional law case.

Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969), famously upheld the First Amendment right of public-school students to wear black armbands at school in protest of the country's i