Franchise Law
 
NICOLE MARIE SWIGER v. JOEL ROSETTE, et al.

Cincinnati, Ohio - Predatory Loan lawyer represented Plaintiff-Appellee with a predatory loan claim.



Swiger alleges that she fell victim to an illegal “rent-a-tribe” scheme when she accepted a
$1200 loan at an interest rate exceeding 350% from online lender Plain Green LLC—an entity
owned by and organized... More...
   $0 (09-27-2021 - OH)

United States of America v. Larry Black, Jr.

Birmingham, AL: Criminal defense lawyer represented defendant charged with conspiracy to defraud his former employer Chick-fil-A.

Larry James Black, Jr., 37, of Center Point, the former Director of Hospitality at Chick-fil-A Five Points, charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and bank fraud. Black’s co-defendant, Joshua Daniel Powell, 40, of Moody, a former manager at the same ... More...
   $0 (09-21-2021 - AL)

Edward Paul Migues v. The State of Texas

Houston, Texas - Criminal defense attorney represented Defendant charged for theft.



The complainant, Michael Hanson, testified that his father, Roger Hanson,
and a business partner, Bobby Brown, operating as SDI Sweeny LLC, owned a Sonic
Drive-in restaurant in Sweeny, Texas (the “Restaurant”). And, they gave Michae... More...
   $0 (07-04-2021 - TX)

GIONINO'S PIZZERIA INC. v. JAMES F. REYNOLDS JR., et al.

Youngstown, Ohio - Franchise Agreement attorney represented Gionino’s Pizzeria, Inc with appealing from a judgment of the Carroll County Court of Common Pleas.



Appellant operates over 45 pizzeria franchises in the region. In 2006,
Jeremy Larkin (“Larkin”), Mark Mitchell and JAE Twin, Inc. (collectively “JAE Twin”... More...
   $0 (06-14-2021 - OH)

Michael Brown and Bobcat 1 Enterprises, Inc. v. DetailXPerts Franchise Systems, LLC

San Jose, California franchise law lawyer represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on a fraud theory claiming more that $75,000 in damages.... More...   $0 (06-10-2021 - CA)

United States of America v. Ruless Pierre

New York, New York criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant, Ruless Pierre, who was charged with securities fraud, wire fraud, and structuring.

U.S. Attorney Audrey Strauss said: “Today, Ruless Pierre was brought to justice for callously lying to investors. Pierre told investors their investment returns were excellent, when in fact he failed to invest investor funds as promised,... More...
   $0 (06-02-2021 - NY)

Rajan Nabe v. Jericho Wholesale LLC and 117 Morningside Ave Corp

New York, New York franchise law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on Petroleum Marketing Practices-Franchise Protection Act violation theory.... More...   $0 (05-11-2021 - NY)

United States of America v. Kent Maerki

Norfolk, Virginia nationwide investment fraud conspiracy charge criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant, Kent Maerki 78, of Scottsdale, the founder of Dental Support Plus Franchise, LLC, and Janus Spectrum, LLC, made a multitude of misrepresentations about those businesses in materials used to solicit investments, including during appearances on radio shows and in a presentation about inves... More...   $0 (03-17-2021 - VA)

VILLAGE OF NEWBURGH HEIGHTS, ET AL. v. STATE OF OHIO

Cleveland, Ohio - Civil attorney represented Village of Newburgh Heights and the city of East Cleveland with appealing from a trial court judgment denying their motion for a preliminary injunction.




On June 27, 2019, Newburgh Heights filed a complaint in the
Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, seeking a declarat... More...
   $0 (01-19-2021 - OH)

Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v. The State of Texas and Travis County, Texas

Austin, TX - Civil defense attorney represented Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft for installing defeat device software in diesel cars to evade compliance with the United States federally mandated emissions standards charge.



In 2006, after concluding that some of their diesel-engine cars would not meet
newly established U.... More...
   $0 (12-22-2020 - )

Building Erection Svcs. Co. v. Walton Construction Co.

Topeka, KS - Litigation lawyer represented defendant Walton Construction Company (Walton) and Building Erection Services Company (BESCO) over liability and damages resulting from faulty construction on the University of Kansas' Memorial Stadium.



This decision resolves the third appeal in this Odyssean litigation
between... More...
   $0 (11-27-2020 - KS)

Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas Family Planning and Preventative Health Services, et al. v. Sylvia Hernandez Kaufmann

In this interlocutory appeal of a preliminary injunction, the dispositive issue is whether 42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)(23) gives Medicaid patients a right to challenge, under 42 U.S.C. 1983, a States determination that a health care provider is not qualified within the meaning of 1396a(a)(23). Our decision rests primarily on two independent bases: (1) the Supreme Courts decision in OBannon v. To... More...   $0 (11-25-2020 - TX)

Department of Fair Employment and Housing v. Cathy's Creations, Inc.

Sacramento, CA - Fair Employment and Housing

The question presented in this appeal is whether an award of attorneys fees under
Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5 was properly denied to the prevailing defendants
in an action brought by Californias Department of Fair Employment and Housing
(DFEH) under Government Code section 12974.1
Section 12974 contains a unilateral... More...
   $0 (09-11-2020 - CA)

Neal Moritz v. Universal City Studios, LLC.

Over the course of approximately 16 years, respondents
Neal Moritz and Neal H. Moritz, Inc. (collectively, Moritz) worked
for appellants, Universal City Studios LLC and its wholly-owned
subsidiary, FFSO Productions LLC (collectively, Universal),
rendering services as a producer for the film The Fast and the
Furious (Universal Pictures 2001) and several sequels thereto
(coll... More...
   $0 (09-03-2020 - CA)

Caliber Paving Company, Inc. v. Rexford Industrial Realty and Management, Inc.

California law recognizes a tort cause of action against a noncontracting
partyalso called a stranger to the contractwho intentionally interferes with the
performance of a contract. (Applied Equipment Corp. v. Litton Saudi Arabia Ltd. (1994)
7 Cal.4th 503, 513-514 (Applied Equipment).) Caliber Paving Company, Inc. (Caliber)
sued Rexford Industrial Realty and Management, Inc. (Rex... More...
   $0 (09-02-2020 - CA)

United States of America v. Markuetric Stringfellow





Columbia, NC - The United States of America charged Markuetric Stringfellow with conspiracy to defraud the South Carolina and North Carolina Medicaid systems.

According to filed plea documents and todays plea hearing, Stringfellow was a resident of Charlotte... More...
   $0 (08-25-2020 - )

Oakland-Alameda County Coliseum Authority v. Golden State Warriors, LLC

Appellant Golden State Warriors, LLC (GSW) challenges the trial
courts judgment confirming an arbitration award. The arbitration concerned
the meaning of the word terminates in section 6.4 of the agreement
governing the basketball teams use of the Oracle Arena in Oakland,
California (the License Agreement). On appeal, GSW argues that allowing
[the] contract to expire by it... More...
   $0 (08-21-2020 - CA)

Pico Neighborhood Association v. City of Santa Monica

A neighborhood organization and a resident sued the City
of Santa Monica, which uses at-large voting to elect its City
Council. The plaintiffs claimed this system discriminated against
Latinos, which is the term all parties use. After a bench trial, the
trial court agreed and ordered the City to switch to district-based
voting. We reverse and enter judgment for the City because... More...
   $0 (07-10-2020 - CA)

Sofia Wilton Barriga v. 99 Cents Only Stores, LLC

Plaintiff Sofia Wilton Barriga filed this lawsuit against 99 Cents Only Stores LLC,
(99 Cents) on her own behalf and on behalf of similarly situated current and former
nonexempt employees of 99 Cents hired before October 1, 1999, and who worked the
graveyard shift after January 1, 2012, until the conclusion of her lawsuit, pleading various
Labor Code violations and violation of the... More...
   $0 (06-28-2020 - CA)

Sofia Wilton Barriga v. 99 Cents Only Stores, LLC

Plaintiff Sofia Wilton Barriga filed this lawsuit against 99 Cents Only Stores LLC,
(99 Cents) on her own behalf and on behalf of similarly situated current and former
nonexempt employees of 99 Cents hired before October 1, 1999, and who worked the
graveyard shift after January 1, 2012, until the conclusion of her lawsuit, pleading various
Labor Code violations and violation of the... More...
   $0 (06-28-2020 - CA)

Gerald Lynn Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia

Sometimes small gestures can have unexpected consequences. Major initiatives practically guarantee them. In our time, few pieces of federal legislation rank in significance with the Civil Rights Act of 1964. There, in Title VII, Congress outlawed discrimination in the workplace on thebasis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Today,we must decide whether an employer can fire someones... More...   $0 (06-15-2020 - GA)

SLPR, LLC v. San Diego Unified Port District

MoreLaw Receptionists
VOIP Phone and Virtual Receptionist Services
Call 918-582-6422 Today



Plaintiffs SLPR, L.L.C. (SLPR), Ann Goodfellow, trustee of the survivor's trust of
the Go... More...
   $0 (05-25-2020 - CA)

Kurtz-Ahlers, LLC v. Bank of America, N.A.

MoreLaw Receptionists
VOIP Phone and Virtual Receptionist Services
Call 918-582-6422 Today



Freelance bookkeeper Elizabeth Mulder perpetrated a nearly five-year fraud
against her cl... More...
   $0 (05-09-2020 - CA)

In re the Marriage of Mary Kay Brewster and Chris Clevenger, Mary Kay Brewster v. Chris Clevenger

In this marital dissolution proceeding, the trial court entered judgment denying
appellant Mary Kay Brewsters (Mary Kay) request for spousal support orders because
she suffered criminal convictions for acts of domestic violence against respondent Chris
Clevenger (Chris). In doing so, the trial court determined Mary Kay had not overcome
the rebuttable presumption set forth in Famil... More...
   $0 (03-09-2020 - CA)

Michael Jeppson v. Eric Ley

This case requires us to define the public interest in the
internet age. The issue arises in an anti-SLAPP motion: a
special motion to strike claims under Code of Civil Procedure
section 425.16. This statute can apply if the targeted claims
arose from protected activity, which the statute defines to
include statements on an issue of public interest.
Neighbors Eric Ley... More...
   $0 (02-03-2020 - CA)

Next Page

Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: