Great Falls, Montana criminal defense lawyer represented the defendant charged with possession with intent to distribute meth.

21 U.S.C. 841 provides:

(a) Unlawful actsExcept as authorized by this subchapter, it shall be unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally—
(1) to manufacture, distribute, or dispense, or possess with intent to manufacture, distribute, or disp... More...   $0 (07-10-2025 - MT)

Great Falls, Montana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with wire fraud.

18 U.S.C. § 1343, the federal wire fraud statute, defines and criminalizes the use of interstate or foreign wire communications to execute a scheme intended to defraud someone of money or property. Essentially, it's a form of fraud that leverages electronic communication for deceptive purposes... More...   $0 (07-10-2025 - MT)

Weston, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud and conspiracy to commit money laundering.

A grand jury charged Mr. Philossaint with (1) conspiracy to
commit wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1343 and 1349; (2)
two counts of conspiracy to commit money laundering, in viola-
tion of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h); and... More...   $0 (07-10-2025 - FL)

Salt Lake City, Utah, Los Angeles, California, and Mimai, Florida lawyers represented the defedant charged with attempt and conspriacy to commit mail fraud.

this case concerned an alleged conspiracy, fraud, and money laundering operation orchestrated from 2012 to 2018 by Mr. Dermen, Jacob Kingston, Isaiah Kingston (Jacob Kingston’s brother), and other co-conspirators. Specifically, Mr. ... More...   $0 (07-09-2025 - UT)

Great Falls, Montana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with using or possessing fraudulent immigration docuemtns in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1546, which provides:

he first paragraph of 18 U.S.C. § 1546(a) proscribes the forging, counterfeiting, altering or falsely making of certain immigration documents or their use, possession, or receipt. The second paragraph pros... More...   $0 (07-07-2025 - MT)

Rochester, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy, aggravated identity theft, access device fraud and conspiracy to commit access device fraud, computer fraud and conspiracy to commit computer fraud, and bank fraud and conspiracy to commit bank fraud
More...   $0 (07-07-2025 - NY)

Fayetteville, Arkansas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with passport fraud.

October 2018, Pineda used a false identity to apply for a United States
passport. In support of her application, Pineda submitted an Arkansas driver’s
license, a birth certificate, and a social security number — all purporting to be A.E.,2
a citizen of the United States wh... More...   $0 (07-07-2025 - AR)

Los Angeles, California criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with Scheme to Fraudulently Obtain $1.3 Million in COVID-19 Jobless Benefits

Inglewood Woman Arrested on Federal Indictment Alleging Scheme to Fraudulently Obtain $1.3 Million in COVID-19 Jobless Benefi... More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - CA)

Detroit, Michigan consumer law lawyers represented this plaintiffs who sought to sue on a class action basis on product liability theory.

With the introduction of automatic transmissions in cars, clutch pedals became obsolete for drivers who do not enjoy using a stick shift. General Motors’ Hydra-Matic became the first readily accessible automatic transmission on the market in 1939. It ... More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - MI)

Billings, Montana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with wire fraud.

18 U.S.C. 1343 provides:

Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or televisi... More...   $0 (07-02-2025 - MT)

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1349.

* * *

18 U.S.C. § 1349, which addresses Attempt and Conspiracy, makes it a federal crime to attempt or conspire to commit wire fraud. This means that if two or more people agree to carry out a fraudulent scheme involving electronic commu... More...   $0 (07-02-2025 - OK)

Boston, Massachusetts qui tam lawyers represented the Plaintiff suing on a False Claims Act fraud theory.

Martin Flanagan brought this qui tam suit against Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc. ("Fresenius"), under the False Claims Act ("FCA"), 31 U.S.C. § 3729, alleging a fraudulent kickback scheme related to referrals to Fresenius-operated dialysis clinics. The district court dismissed... More...   $0 (07-01-2025 - MA)

Minneapolis, Minnesota criminal defence lawyer represented the Defendant charged with bank fraud, wire fruad, and mail fraud.

Khemall Jokhoo carried out a fraudulent debt-collection scheme, a jury convicted him of aggravated identity
theft, impersonating a federal officer or employee, and bank, mail, and wire fraud. ... More...   $0 (06-27-2025 - TX)