Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer Scott Troy represented the Defendant charge with Distribution and Receipt of Possession of Child Pornography in Indian Country in violation of 18:2252(a)(2) and 2252(b)(1), which provide:


(a) Any person who—
(1) knowingly transports or ships using any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce or in or affecting interstate or

New Orleans, Louisiana insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

"Louisiana bad faith breach of insurance contract law is governed by two primary statutes: Louisiana Revised Statute (R.S.) 22:1973 and R.S. 22:1892. These statutes establish the legal framework for holding insurers accountable for acting in bad

New Orleans, Louisiana insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

"Louisiana bad faith breach of insurance contract law is governed by two primary statutes: Louisiana Revised Statute (R.S.) 22:1973 and R.S. 22:1892. These statutes establish the legal framework for holding insurers accountable for acting in bad

Miami, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with sexual contact with a minor under 12 years old.

In May 2023, Justin Dale Sigmon, 47, while on a cruise that departed from the Port of Miami, repeatedly put his hands up the skirt of a nine-year-old, rubbing her inner thighs and private area, despite her repeatedly pushing his hands away on multiple occasions. Tw

Des Moines, Iowa insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory claiming $84,000 in damages as a direct result.

"Elements of a Bad Faith Breach of Insurance Contract Claim in Iowa

To succeed in a bad faith breach of insurance contract claim in Iowa, a plaintiff must prove the following elements:

Worland, Wyoming family law lawyers represented the parties in a custody and visitation case.

In 2019, the Beldens, the grandparents of the children of their deceased son, were granted visitation after their relationship with Nicole soured. In 2022, Andy the children's stepfather, adopted the children. Thereafter, the Wards informed the Beldens that they would no longer comply with the or

Miami, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with engaging in cyber harassment.

Anthony Brillante II, 35, of Miami, a student at FIU during most of the time of the crimes, spoofed hundreds of different phone numbers to send three victims—his cousin, her husband, and their 12-year-old daughter—tens of thousands of phone calls and text messages, including cou

Phoenix, Arizona personal injury medical malpractice lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on medical negligence theories.

"Krystle Griepentrog, individually and on behalf of her minor son Greyson, claimed that Dr. Laurie P. Erickson committed medical malpractice by failing to assure that her son Greyson brain was adequately oxygenated during delivery and, as a direct

New York City, New York employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants Fair Labor Standards Act violations Theories.

Plaintiff Graham Chase Robinson initiated this action on October 3, 2019 by filing a complaint against Canal Productions, Inc. and Robert De Niro, asserting various claims, including claims for gender discrimination and retaliation under federal a

Honolulu, Hawaii insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who used the Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

"In Hawaii, a bad faith breach of insurance contract claim can be brought against an insurance company when the company acts in a way that is inconsistent with its duty of good faith and fair dealing under the insurance contract.

To establish

Defendant and appellant, Anthony Rome, Sr. (Anthony), was found guilty by the trial court of taking a minor child from the custodial parent, in violation of SDCL 22-19-9 and 22-19-10.[*] Anthony was sentenced to five years in the South Dakota Penitentiary, execution of sentence suspended upon his compliance with certain conditions of probation. Anthony appeals. We reverse and remand.

Anth

Charlotte, North Carolina consumer credit lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on Fair Credit Reporting Act violation theories under 15 U.S.C. 1681, which provides:

(a) Accuracy and fairness of credit reportingThe Congress makes the following findings:
(1) The banking system is dependent upon fair and accurate credit reporting. Inaccurate credit reports directly im

Wilmington, North Carolina insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

"North Carolina law recognizes bad faith breach of insurance contract as a separate tort claim. This means that an insured can sue its insurance company for bad faith, even if the insured's claim for breach of contract is unsuccessful.

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract.

"Under Oklahoma law, an insurance company has a duty of good faith and fair dealing with its policyholders. This means that the insurance company must act in a reasonable and fair manner when handling claims. If the insurance company breaches this du

Little Rock, Arkansas defendant charged, convicted and exonerated of murder

Scotty Scott was charged with murder in the killing of Betty Thornton, age 45, a cashier at a Little Rock, Arkansas convenience store on November 1981.

Scott was identifed from a photo lineup by an African American witness.

Scott admitted that he had been at the store but that he did not kill the

Concluding that a defendant committed the tort of malicious prosecution, the Court awards $1,769,354 in compensatory, economic, and punitive damages in favor of a man the defendant falsely accused of committing gross sexual assaults and assaults against his then wife. The Court's verdict and judgment runs against his now ex-wife's friend, who conspired with his wife to concoct the allegations that

Petitioner Roland Chretien, a New Hampshire State Prison
inmate, seeks federal habeas relief from his state court
conviction, alleging violations of his constitutional rights
based on evidentiary rulings at his trial. This court has
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal question) and the
Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AEDPA”).
See

Concord, New Hamphire civil rights lawyers represented the Petitioner seeking a writ of habeas corpus.

The respondent, the Warden of the New Hampshire State Prison, has moved for summary judgment. After a hearing, and for the following reasons, the Warden's motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part, and an evidentiary hearing will be scheduled to address Chretien's

Brentwood, New Hampshire defendant charged with sexual assault convicted and exonerated.

Roland Chretien, age 44, was accused of chocking and forcing a woman to perform oral sex at the Blazing Saddle store in Plaistow, New Hampshire in June 2003.

The Defendant waived his right to a jury.

The 46-year-old complainant woman claimed that Chretien assaulted her, forced her in

Lexington, North Carolina criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with murder.

¶ 1 In the early morning hours of 2 August 2015, a Davidson County 911 operator received a call regarding an incident at 160 Panther Creek Court. The caller, Thomas Martens (Tom), reported that his son-in-law, Jason Corbett (Jason), "got in a fight" with his daughter, Molly Martens Corbett

Miami, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with COVID-19 relief fraud.

Arashio Harris, 49, of Miami-Dade County, Florida, had previously pleaded guilty to wire fraud in connection with his fraudulent applications for two Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans, two Economic Injury Disaster Loans (EIDL) and an EIDL advance.

Harris, along with being a

Chicago, Illinois criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with the August 19, 2006, murder of Maquis Lovings in Rolling Hills, Illinois.

The State accused Patrick Taylor, age 37, of entering Lovings resident and robbing and killing him.

Veljko Bjelica was a witness to the robbery and murder.

Detective Dan Cook of the Rolling Meadows police department t

Youngstown, Ohio insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

Ohio is a bad faith breach of insurance contract law state. This means that insurance companies in Ohio have a duty to act in good faith when handling their customers' claims. If an insurance company fails to act in good faith, it may be liable for b

Gulfport, Mississippi insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on bad faith breach of an insurance contract theory.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court of Hancock County, Mississippi, 22-00217, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

"Mississippi bad faith breach of insurance contract law allows policyholders to sue their insurers fo

Denver, constitutional law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant seeking a declaratory judgment that Donald Trump violated the 14th Amendment on January 5, 2021 and should be barred from serving as President again.

Petitioners Norma Anderson, Michelle Priola, Claudine Cmarada, Krista Kafer, Kathi
Wright, and Christopher Castilian, eligible Colorado electors, bring t