Imputed Fault Law
 
Jody Blatchley, et al. v. St. Anthony Summit Medical Center

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a medical malpractice negligence theory.

To prevail on a claim of medical malpractice in Colorado, a plaintiff must prove that a healthcare provider failed to conform to an acceptable standard of health care and that this failure caused injury. A jury will compare the defendant’s conduct with w... More...
   $0 (02-27-2024 - CO)

William Reed v. Expeditus Transport, LLC

Albuquerque, New Mexico personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Tenth Judicial District Court, Harding County, D-1010-CV-23-00031, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Negligence claims are the legal system's method for determining fault in injury-causing accidents and how much, if anything,... More...
   $1 (02-20-2024 - NM)

Sharisse Brisker-Stevenson v. L Oreal USA, Inc., et al.

Chicago, Illinois personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a product liability theory.

Illinois has adopted modified comparative negligence (735 ILCS 5/2-1116) as the standard for recovery of damages. Under modified comparative negligence, an injured party may recover damages only if he/she is less than 50% at fault for the injury or damages.

L’Oréal USA le... More...
   $0 (02-26-2024 - IL)

Jose Medina, et al. v. De La Cruz, et al.

McAllen, Texas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Hidalgo County, District Court, 398 Judicial District and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

In Texas, is a “modified” comparative negligence state. Under the Texas modified comparative negligence standard, a plaintitff can sue for da... More...
   $1 (02-23-2024 - TX)

Dr. Daniel Rodriquez v. Little Giant Ladder Systems, LLC

Portland, Oregon personal Injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a product liability theory.

Oregon's product liability laws require a plaintiff to be no more than 50 percent at fault to be awarded damages. If you think you have a products liability claim, it is very important to protect and preserve the product as much as possible, and prevent any avoidable deterioration or change in... More...
   $1 (02-16-2024 - OR)

United States of America v. Robert Wisnicki

Bronx, New York Criminal Defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Operating $18.8 Million Ponzi Scheme, Money Laundering, Obstruction Of Justice, And Perjury.



Robert Wisnicki was sentenced to 78 months in prison by U.S. District Judge Paul G. Gardephe for operating an $18.8 million Ponzi scheme run through his N... More...
   $0 (02-15-2024 - NY)

United States of America v. Robert Wisnicki

New York, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Operating $18.8 Million Ponzi Scheme, Money Laundering, Obstruction Of Justice, And Perjury.



Robert Wisnicki was sentenced to 78 months in prison by U.S. District Judge Paul G. Gardeph... More...
   $0 (02-15-2024 - NY)

J.A.S. v. S.W.S.

Birmingham, Alabama family law lawyer represented the Petitioner who sued the Respondent seeking a divorce without children.

Along with an “irretrievable breakdown" (i.e., no fault, which all 50 states permit) of the marriage, the standard grounds for divorce in Alabama include adultery, cruelty, incurable insanity, and “the commission of the crime against nature, whether with mankind... More...
   $0 (09-15-2023 - AL)

In Re the marriage of D.M., Petitioner, v. J.M., Respondent

Wagoner, Oklahoma, family law lawyer represented the Petitioner who sued the Respondent seeking a divorce without children.

Oklahoma allows for both no-fault and fault-based divorces. The difference comes down to whether the court will require one spouse to show that the marriage is ending because of the other spouses' behavior. You can expect a no-fault divorce in Oklahoma to be resolved... More...
   $0 (01-03-2023 - ok)

In Re the marriage of C.L.P., Petitioner, v. M.S.P., Respondent

Claremore, Oklahoma, family law lawyer represented the Petitioner who sued the Respondent seeking a divorce without children.

Oklahoma allows for both no-fault and fault-based divorces. The difference comes down to whether the court will require one spouse to show that the marriage is ending because of the other spouses' behavior. You can expect a no-fault divorce in Oklahoma to be resolv... More...
   $0 (01-03-2023 - OK)

In Re the marriage of C.E., Petitioner, v. T.E., Respondent

Pawhuska, Oklahoma, family law lawyer represented the Petitioner who sued the Respondent seeking a divorce without children.

Oklahoma allows for both no-fault and fault-based divorces. The difference comes down to whether the court will require one spouse to show that the marriage is ending because of the other spouses' behavior. You can expect a no-fault divorce in Oklahoma to be resolve... More...
   $0 (01-03-2023 - OK)

In Re the marriage of J.G., Petitioner, v. A.G., Respondent

Okmulgee, Oklahoma, family law lawyer represented the Petitioner who sued the Respondent seeking a divorce without children.

Oklahoma allows for both no-fault and fault-based divorces. The difference comes down to whether the court will require one spouse to show that the marriage is ending because of the other spouses' behavior. You can expect a no-fault divorce in Oklahoma to be resolve... More...
   $0 (01-04-2023 - OK)

In Re the marriage of N.R., Petitioner, v. L.R., Respondent.

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, family law lawyer represented the Petitioner who sued the Respondent seeking a divorce without children.

Oklahoma allows for both no-fault and fault-based divorces. The difference comes down to whether the court will require one spouse to show that the marriage is ending because of the other spouses' behavior. You can expect a no-fault divorce in Oklahoma to be re... More...
   $0 (01-03-2023 - OK)

In Re the marriage of J.U., Petitioner, and J.D.U, Respondent

Muskogee, Oklahoma, family law lawyer represented the Petitioner who sued the Respondent seeking a divorce without children.

Oklahoma allows for both no-fault and fault-based divorces. The difference comes down to whether the court will require one spouse to show that the marriage is ending because of the other spouses' behavior. You can expect a no-fault divorce in Oklahoma to be resolve... More...
   $0 (01-03-2023 - OK)

In Re the marriage of R.C.P., Petitioner, v. J.A.P., Respondent

Enid, Oklahoma, family law lawyer represented the Petitioner who sued the Respondent seeking a divorce without children.

Oklahoma allows for both no-fault and fault-based divorces. The difference comes down to whether the court will require one spouse to show that the marriage is ending because of the other spouses' behavior. You can expect a no-fault divorce in Oklahoma to be resolved mu... More...
   $0 (01-03-2024 - OK)

In Re the marriage of R.B.H., Petitioner and R.L.H.

Bristow, Oklahoma, family law lawyer represented the Petitioner who sued the Respondent seeking a divorce without children.

Oklahoma allows for both no-fault and fault-based divorces. The difference comes down to whether the court will require one spouse to show that the marriage is ending because of the other spouses' behavior. You can expect a no-fault divorce in Oklahoma to be resolved... More...
   $0 (01-04-2023 - OK)

In Re the marriage of W.B. Petitioner and M.E.B., Respondent

Sapulpa, Oklahoma, family law lawyer represented the Petitioner who sued the Respondent seeking a divorce without children.

Oklahoma allows for both no-fault and fault-based divorces. The difference comes down to whether the court will require one spouse to show that the marriage is ending because of the other spouses' behavior. You can expect a no-fault divorce in Oklahoma to be resolved... More...
   $0 (02-09-2024 - )

In Re the marriage of R.E.P. v. M.G.B.P.

Adair, Oklahoma family law lawyer represented the Petitioner who sued the Respondent seeking a divorce without children.

Oklahoma allows for both no-fault and fault-based divorces. The difference comes down to whether the court will require one spouse to show that the marriage is ending because of the other spouses' behavior. You can expect a no-fault divorce in Oklahoma to be resolved mu... More...
   $0 (01-03-2023 - OK)

In Re the marriage of M.F. v. D.W.

Norman, Oklahoma family law lawyer represented the Petitioner who sued the Respondent seeking a divorce without children.

Oklahoma allows for both no-fault and fault-based divorces. The difference comes down to whether the court will require one spouse to show that the marriage is ending because of the other spouses' behavior. You can expect a no-fault divorce in Oklahoma to be resolved m... More...
   $0 (01-03-2023 - OK)

In re the marriage of S.G.S. v. B.W.S.

El Reno, Oklahoma family law lawyer represented the Petitioner who sued the Respondent seeking a divorce with children.

Oklahoma allows for both no-fault and fault-based divorces. The difference comes down to whether the court will require one spouse to show that the marriage is ending because of the other spouses' behavior. You can expect a no-fault divorce in Oklahoma to be resolved muc... More...
   $0 (01-03-2023 - OK)

In Re the Marriage of L.J.S. v. J.S.

Stilwell, Oklahoma, family law lawyer represented the Petitioner who sued the Respondent seeking a divorce without children.

Oklahoma allows for both no-fault and fault-based divorces. The difference comes down to whether the court will require one spouse to show that the marriage is ending because of the other spouses' behavior. You can expect a no-fault divorce in Oklahoma to be resolve... More...
   $0 (01-10-2023 - OK)

In re the marriage of D.M.P. v. E.M.P.

Tulsa, Oklahoma family law lawyer represented the Petitioner who sued the Respondent seeking a divorce wihout minor children.

Oklahoma allows for both no-fault and fault-based divorces. The difference comes down to whether the court will require one spouse to show that the marriage is ending because of the other spouses' behavior. You can expect a no-fault divorce in Oklahoma to be resolv... More...
   $0 (01-05-2023 - OK)

Juan Antonio Montemayor, et al. v. Juan Quinones, d/b/a DJ's Transport

Kansas City, Kansas personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on auto negligence theories.

Kansas follows the comparative negligence rule. This rule means that if you are found to have contributed to causing the accident in which you were injured, your compensation will be reduced by your percentage of fault.

... More...
   $1 (02-06-2024 - KS)

Baunita K. Fernandez v. Derek Wietjes and Headlight Trucking, LLC

Pierre, South Dakota personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

South Dakota has the “slight negligence” system in which the plaintiff may recover a proportionate fault share of his damages only so long as the trier of fact finds the plaintiff's negligence to be “slight” in comparison to the negligence of the ... More...
   $0 (01-24-2024 - SD)

Nichole Robinette, et al. v. Globus Medical

Salt Lake City, Utah personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a product liability law theory.

Globus Medical is a leading medical device manufacturer with the goal of improving the quality of life for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. We are inspired by the needs of these patients and by the surgeons and healthcare providers who treat them.
More...
   $1 (01-30-2024 - UT)

Next Page

Find a Lawyer
Find a Case
AK Morlan
Kent Morlan, Esq.
Editor & Publisher