Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on medical malpractice and nursing home negligence theories.

The plaintiff was appointed the personal representative of the Estate of Linda Kay Cervantes. The plaintiff claimed that the defendants provided substandard care to Ms. Cervantes, and as a direct result, she died from pneumonia and sepsis ... More...   $1 (11-16-2023 - OK)

Kansas City, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages in a car wreck caused by Christopher Martin.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, MO at Kansas City, 2316-CV05582, and was removed to federal court by the the Defendant.
... More...   $0 (11-13-2023 - MO)

Baltimore, Maryland personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory claiming $94,000 in damages and/or injuries.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County, C-02-CV-23-000668, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Dave & Buster's Grand Sports Cafe in a restaurant and entertainment business headquar... More...   $0 (11-13-2023 - MD)

Baltimore, Maryland personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on an admiralty law theory under 28 U.S.C. 1333, which provides:

The district courts shall have original jurisdiction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of:
(1) Any civil case of admiralty or maritime jurisdiction, saving to suitors in all cases all other remedies to which they are other... More...   $1 (11-13-2023 - MD)

Greenbelt, Maryland personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court of Prince George's County, Maryland, C16CV22001268, and was removed to federal court the Defendant.

"Maryland premises liability law is based on the principle that property owners have a duty to keep their ... More...   $1 (11-13-2023 - MD)

San Diego, California personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have been injured and/or damaged in a car wreck caused by Cesar Loredo.

This case was initially filed in the Superior Court of California, 37-02020-00020680-CU-PA-CTL, and was removed to federal court by the United States Government on the claim against Ce... More...   $1 (11-09-2023 - CA)

New YOrk, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory.

"New York premises liability negligence law is based on the principle that property owners have a duty to keep their premises safe for visitors. This duty applies to both business and residential property owners.

To establish a premises liability negligence claim in ... More...   $0 (11-09-2023 - NY)

New York City, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on product liability theories.

"New York product liability law is based on a combination of negligence, strict liability, and breach of warranty theories.

Negligence

To establish a negligence claim against a product manufacturer, a plaintiff must prove the following elements... More...   $0 (11-09-2023 - NY)

Charlotte, North Carolina personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

North Carolina Auto Negligence Law:

1. Pure Contributory Negligence:

North Carolina is one of the few states that still follows a pure contributory negligence system... More...   $1 (11-08-2023 - NC)

Billings, Montana personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Montana Auto Negligence Law

Fault-Based System: Montana operates under a fault-based system for auto negligence. This means that the driver deemed at fault for causing the accident w... More...   $1 (11-08-2023 - MT)

Billings, Montana personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on product liability theories.

Montana's product liability law is a complex area with various nuances and recent changes. Here's a breakdown of key points:

Legal Theories:

Defective Product: A product is considered defective if it's unreasonably dangerous due to design, manufa... More...   $0 (11-08-2023 - MT)

Little Rock, Arkansas personal injury lawyer truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

"Arkansas follows a pure contributory negligence standard for auto accidents. This means that a plaintiff cannot recover damages if they are found to be any percentage at fault for the accident.

Here are some of the key provisions of Arka... More...   $1 (11-07-2023 - AR)

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

"Oklahoma follows a modified comparative negligence standard for auto accidents. This means that a plaintiff's damages may be reduced by the percentage of fault they are assigned for the accident. However, a plaintiff can still recover damages even if they a... More...   $1 (11-07-2023 - OK)

Madison, Wisconsin personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on negligence theories.

"Understanding negligence law in Wisconsin is crucial if you've been injured due to someone else's carelessness. Here's a breakdown of key elements:

Duty of Care: Everyone in Wisconsin has a duty to act with reasonable care under the circumstances to avoid harming o... More...   $1 (11-06-2023 - WI)

Muskogee, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

This case was filed in the Bryan County District Court, CJ-22-00063, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Oklahoma auto negligence law provides that the Plaintiff prove that t... More...   $0 (11-02-2023 - OK)

Charlotte, North Carolina personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

This case was filed in the Robeson County Superior Court, 22CVS3061 and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

North Carolina Auto Negligence Law:

1. Pure C... More...   $1 (11-02-2023 - NC)

Concord, New Hamphire civil rights lawyers represented the Petitioner seeking a writ of habeas corpus.

The respondent, the Warden of the New Hampshire State Prison, has moved for summary judgment. After a hearing, and for the following reasons, the Warden's motion for summary judgment is granted in part and denied in part, and an evidentiary hearing will be scheduled to address Chretien's... More...   $0 (11-02-2023 - NY)

Omaha, Nebraska personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the District Court of Washington County, Nebraska, CI 23-00159, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Plaintiff challenged the jurisdiction of the court and sought remand.

Nebraska is a modified comparative fault state ... More...   $0 (10-27-2023 - NE)

Albuquerque, New Mexico personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a federal government employee's failure to exercise due care in the operation of a motor vehicle.

New Mexico Auto Negligence Law:

"Pure Comparative Negl... More...   $1 (10-25-2023 - NM)

Natchez, Mississippi personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Adams County Circuit Court, MS, 22-KV-0014-B, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

"Mississippi personal injury premises liability law holds property owners and occupiers responsible for injuries that occur to visitors on t... More...   $0 (10-25-2023 - MS)

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Denver County District Court, 2022CV33567, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Colorado negligence law is based on the principle that people have a duty to act reasonably and avoid causing harm to others. If someone breaches thi... More...   $0 (10-23-2023 - CO)

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory.

Colorado negligence law is based on the principle that people have a duty to act reasonably and avoid causing harm to others. If someone breaches this duty and their actions cause harm, they may be held liable for negligence.

To prove negligence, a plaintiff must estab... More...   $1 (10-23-2023 - CO)

Spokane, Washington personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Duty of care: All drivers in Washington have a duty to operate their vehicles safely and follow traffic laws to avoid harming others. This includes avoiding behaviors like:

... More...   $0 (10-19-2023 - WA)

Chattanooga, Tennessee personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a product liability negligence theory.

Tennessee Product Liability Law

Duty of care: Manufacturers and sellers in Tennessee have a legal duty to provide products that are safe for their intended use and free from defects. This includes:

Designing and manufacturing produc... More...   $1 (10-17-2023 - TN)

Albuquerque, New Mexico personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a medical malpractice negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Second Judicial District Court, D-202-CV-22-03419, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

The current diversity jurisdiction provision is codified at 28 U.S.C. § 1332, and grants federal court jurisdiction in all ci... More...   $0 (10-11-2023 - NM)