Imputed Fault Law
 
Nesbett H. Johnson, Jr. v. Jean's Team Logistics LLC, et al.

Rock Hill, South Carolina personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Chester County Court of Common Pleas, 2023-CP-12-00086, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Some states subscribe to the “pure comparative negligence” rule, where a plaintiff can recover damages even if he or ... More...
   $0 (02-13-2024 - SC)

Jerome Wade v. Aizhan Kadnbaeva and GTS Transportation Corporation

Roanoke, Virginia personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Montgomery County Circuit Court, CL-22002004-00, and was removed to federal court by the Dfendant.

Some states follow a more enlightened version of the fault law called "comparative negligence." Alas, Virginia still chooses what is known ... More...
   $1 (02-12-2024 - VA)

Eury Tavarez Hernandez v. Domino's Pizza LLC, et al.

Brooklyn, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on auto negligence theories.


ORDER granting #9 Motion to Amend: The Stipulation to discontinue the action as to Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., without prejudice, and to substitute Domino's Pizza LLC in its place.
New York's contributory negligence law allows injured individuals to recover compen... More...
   $0 (02-12-2024 - NY)

In Re the marriage of W.B. Petitioner and M.E.B., Respondent

Sapulpa, Oklahoma, family law lawyer represented the Petitioner who sued the Respondent seeking a divorce without children.

Oklahoma allows for both no-fault and fault-based divorces. The difference comes down to whether the court will require one spouse to show that the marriage is ending because of the other spouses' behavior. You can expect a no-fault divorce in Oklahoma to be resolved... More...
   $0 (02-09-2024 - )

Juan Antonio Montemayor, et al. v. Juan Quinones, d/b/a DJ's Transport

Kansas City, Kansas personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on auto negligence theories.

Kansas follows the comparative negligence rule. This rule means that if you are found to have contributed to causing the accident in which you were injured, your compensation will be reduced by your percentage of fault.

... More...
   $1 (02-06-2024 - KS)

William J. Moyle v. Roger T. Clark, et al.

Omaha, Nebraska personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

In Nebraska, the right to compensation is based on the “51% rule.” A plaintiff can still recover partial compensation so long as their degree of fault is less than that of the defendant(s) in the case. The plaintiff's compensation will be reduced in proportion to their percentage o... More...
   $1 (02-03-2024 - NE)

Erick Rico v. Omar Said, Story Trucking, and Quality Refrigerated Transport, Inc.

Columbus, Ohio personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Ohio negligence laws follow the modified comparative negligence approach which reduces damages in proportion to the claimant's degree of fault. However, if a claimant is found to be 51% or more at fault for their damages, they are barred from recovering anything.

... More...
   $1 (02-02-2024 - OH)

Jake Hanselman v. John Gravitt

El Reno, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Oklahoma has a modified comparative negligence law. Under this rule, a car accident victim who shares the blame for a crash may recover compensation as long as they are not more at fault for the accident than the defendant. The accident victim's compensation is reduced based... More...
   $0 (02-02-2024 - OK)

Ashton Donovan v. Hayden Cook and Dominck Johnson

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on atuo negligence theories.

Oklahoma has a modified comparative negligence law. Under this rule, a car accident victim who shares the blame for a crash may recover compensation as long as they are not more at fault for the accident than the defendant. The accident victim's compensation is reduced bas... More...
   $1 (02-01-2024 - OK)

Jose Fuentes Hernandez, et al. v. Estate of Jorge Pina

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

Oklahoma has a modified comparative negligence law. Under this rule, a car accident victim who shares the blame for a crash may recover compensation as long as they are not more at fault for the accident than the defendant. The accident victim's compensation is reduced based on their as... More...
   $1 (02-01-2024 - OK)

Nichole Robinette, et al. v. Globus Medical

Salt Lake City, Utah personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a product liability law theory.

Globus Medical is a leading medical device manufacturer with the goal of improving the quality of life for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. We are inspired by the needs of these patients and by the surgeons and healthcare providers who treat them.
More...
   $1 (01-30-2024 - UT)

Paula J. Wright v. Paul Raymond Cumberledge

Wheeling, West Virginia personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Under West Virginia's comparative negligence laws, an injury victim who is 50% or less at fault for an accident can recover compensation for their injuries. Their total amount of damages will then be reduced by the percentage that they were to blame for the accident.... More...
   $1 (01-29-2024 - WV)

Jhung W. Jhung v. Penelope C. Arnold

Providence, Rhode Island personal injury car wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

"Rhode Island is a "fault" state, which means that the at-fault driver is responsible for the damages and injuries caused in a car accident. To determine liability, the following three factors are considered: 1. Negligence: Negligence refers to a person's failure to ... More...
   $1 (01-29-2024 - RI)

Richard M. Henry v. Evonik Corporation

Peoria, Illinois personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

Illinois has adopted modified comparative negligence (735 ILCS 5/2-1116) as the standard for recovery of damages. Under modified comparative negligence, an injured party may recover damages only if he/she is less than 50% at fault for the injury or damag... More...
   $1 (01-29-2024 - IL)

Baunita K. Fernandez v. Derek Wietjes and Headlight Trucking, LLC

Pierre, South Dakota personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

South Dakota has the “slight negligence” system in which the plaintiff may recover a proportionate fault share of his damages only so long as the trier of fact finds the plaintiff's negligence to be “slight” in comparison to the negligence of the ... More...
   $0 (01-24-2024 - SD)

Richard Kail v. Caravan Cargo Group, Inc., et al.

Cheyenne, Wyoming personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

Wyoming does use modified comparative negligence statutes, which allow for shared fault. If you are less than 50 percent responsible, you can collect damages from the other driver (or, in most cases, their insurance company).... More...
   $1 (01-24-2024 - WY)

Whitney C. Watson, et aux. v. Central Transport, LLC

East St. Louis, Illinois personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Defendants who were sued on auto negligence theories.

Illinois has adopted modified comparative negligence (735 ILCS 5/2-1116) as the standard for recovery of damages. Under modified comparative negligence, an injured party may recover damages only if he/she is less than 50% at fault for the injury or damages.More...
   $1 (01-24-2024 - IL)

Thomas Banner v. West Central Transport, LLC, et al.

Albuquerque, New Mexico personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto
negligence theory.

This case was filed in the First Judicial District Court, D-101-cv-22-01660 and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Unlike many other states, New Mexico is a pure comparative negligence state. Under this legal theory, the amo... More...
   $0 (01-23-2024 - NM)

Jeanine Potter v. Target Corporation

New Albany, Indiana personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented the Plaintiff who used the Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Clark Superior Court #6, 10D06-2301-CT-000008, and was removed to federal court by Target.

Indiana Premises Liability Law:

Premises liability law in Indiana protects individuals from injuries susta... More...
   $1 (01-23-2024 - IN)

Ron Ward v. Kellogg USA, LLC and APL Logistics, Ltd.

Chicago, Illinois personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court of Will County, Illinois, 23-LA-674 and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Illinois auto negligence law governs how liability and damages are determined in car accidents. Here's a breakdown of its k... More...
   $1 (01-22-2024 - IL)

Yasmin Sanchez v. Sam's East, Inc., dba Sam's Club, et al.

Knoxville, Tennessee personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Knox County Circuit Court, 1-283-22, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Tennessee premises liability law governs when a property owner or occupier can be held responsible for injuries that occur on their ... More...
   $1 (01-18-2024 - TN)

Micahel L. Uselton and Nicole D. Uselton v. Expedited Logistics and Freight Services LLC, et al.

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theory.


This case was filed in the Oklahoma County District Court, CJ-21-02613, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Oklahoma has a modified comparative negligence law. Under this rule, a car accident victim who shares the blame for a... More...
   $1 (01-12-2024 - OK)

Eboni Edwards v. Kerry Limberg

New Orleans, Louisiana personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence
theory.

This case was filed in the Civil District Court, Orleans Parish, 22-02816 E 7, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Louisiana personal injury negligence law

Navigating Louisiana personal injury negligence law can be complex, but... More...
   $1 (01-12-2024 - LA)

Remy Nelson v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

Greenbelt, Maryland personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a premises negligence theory.


Maryland personal injury law protects individuals who have been injured due to the carelessness or recklessness of another person. If you've been hurt in an accident, whether from a car crash, slip and fall, or medical malpractice, you may be enti... More...
   $1 (01-12-2024 - MD)

New Heights Farm I, LLC, et al v. Great American Insurance Company, et al.

Grand Rapids, Michigan insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on bad faith breach of insurance contract theories.


Key elements of a bad faith claim in Michigan:

Breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing: This duty requires the insurance company to handle claims promptly, fairly, and in accordance with the terms of the policy.
... More...
   $1 (01-11-2024 - MI)

Next Page

Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: