| Imputed Fault Law |
| |
|
Antwanette Conway v. Bryson Schrock and Door Dash, Inc.
|
|
South Bend, Indiana personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
Indiana follows the rule of modified comparative fault, which is also used by 32 other states. Under Indiana law, you may recover damages as long as you are not more than 50 percent responsible for the accident. However, your percentage of fault will reduce the amount of c... More... $1 (03-15-2024 - IN)
|
|
Pava Logistics, Inc. PGT Trucking, Inc., et al.
|
|
Chicago, Illinois personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
Illinois has adopted modified comparative negligence (735 ILCS 5/2-1116) as the standard for recovery of damages. Under modified comparative negligence, an injured party may recover damages only if he/she is less than 50% at fault for the injury or damages.... More... $0 (03-14-2024 - IL)
|
|
Janaya Hatten and Robert Hatten v. Yussuf Agane, et al.
|
|
Albuquerque, New Mexico personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.
This case was filed in the Second Judicial District Court, D-202-CV-22-01715, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.
New Mexico is a pure comparative negligence state. That means that fault can be shared among drivers, with each driver being assigned a perce... More... $0 (03-13-2024 - NM)
|
|
Rosalba Suarez, et al. v. Brandon Helvie and New Prime Inc.
|
|
El Paso, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.
Texas, is a “modified” comparative negligence state. Under the Texas modified comparative negligence standard, plaintiffs can sue for damages even if they are partially at fault for an accident. However, if they are found to be more than 50% to blame for an ... More... $1 (03-13-2024 - TX)
|
|
Karen Hayes v. Amy Smith
|
|
San Antonio, Texas personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
This case was filed in the 438th Judicial District Court of Bexar County, TX, 2023CI24493, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.
Texas is a “modified” comparative negligence state. Under the Texas modified comparative negligence standard, plaintiff... More... $0 (03-13-2024 - TX)
|
|
Cynthia Helder Gary v. Kwik Trip, Inc.
|
|
Minneapolis, Minnesota personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
Minnesota follows the “comparative negligence” rule. Under this system, a plaintiff's compensation can be reduced by a percentage that equals their share of fault in causing the accident. If a plaintiff is found to be more than 50% at fault, they are barred from recovering d... More... $0 (03-12-2024 - WI)
|
|
Rodrigo Gomez v. Barahona Transportation, LLC, et al.
|
|
Austin, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
This case was filed in the 453rd Judicial District Court of Hays County, Texa, 21-02083, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.
Texas, is a “modified” comparative negligence state. Under the Texas modified comparative negligence standard, plaintiffs c... More... $0 (03-12-2024 - TX)
|
|
April May v. Infinity Express, LLC
|
|
Billings, Montana personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
Montana follows a “modified” comparative negligence rule, which means that a plaintiff can recover damages only if their degree of fault is less than 50%. If the plaintiff's fault is found to be 50% or more, they are barred from recovering any damages.... More... $0 (03-11-2024 - MT)
|
|
Derek Fernau v. Kaunas Trucking, Inc., et al.
|
|
Abilene, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.
This case was filed in the County Court at Law No. 3, Dallas County, Texas, CC-22-05707-C, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.
Texas is a “modified” comparative negligence state. Under the Texas modified comparative negligence standard, plaintiffs... More... $1 (03-11-2024 - TX)
|
|
Belinda Davis v. Dart Transit Company
|
|
Dallas, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.
This case was filed in the Dallas County Court at Law No. 2, CC-23-00227-B, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.
Texas is a “modified” comparative negligence state. Under the Texas modified comparative negligence standard, plaintiffs c... More... $1 (03-11-2024 - TX)
|
|
Julius E. Williams v. Douglas R. Shed
|
|
Richmond, Virginia personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on auto negligence theories.
This case was filed in the General District Court for the City of Richmond, GV23004707-00, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.
Some states follow a more enlightened version of the fault law called "comparative negligence." Alas, Virgi... More... $1 (03-08-2024 - VA)
|
|
Mark B. Peteson v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc
|
|
Boise, Idaho personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
This case was filled in the Ada County District Court, CV01-23-05561, and was removed to federal court by FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.
Idaho follows the modified comparative negligence rule. Under this rule, a plaintiff (the injured party) can only recover damage... More... $0 (03-07-2024 - ID)
|
|
Carlos R. Rangel v. Gary White
|
|
Hot Springs, Arkansas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory.
Arkansas is a modified comparative fault state. This means that if a victim is found to be 50% at fault for their injuries, they will be barred from recovering compensation of any kind. Multiple parties can have acted negligently, contributing to a victim's injuries, incl... More... $248000 (03-07-2024 - AR)
|
|
Cory L. Cotter v. Bethany College, et al.
|
|
Youngstown, Ohio personal injury car wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
Ohio negligence laws follow the modified comparative negligence approach which reduces damages in proportion to the claimant's degree of fault. However, if a claimant is found to be 51% or more at fault for their damages, they are barred from recovering anything.
... More... $0 (03-07-2024 - OH)
|
|
Jaem Doe v. Dr. David J. Durkin and Ketamine Infusion of Montana, LLC
|
|
Missoula, Montana personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.
Montana follows a “modified” comparative negligence rule, which means that a plaintiff can recover damages only if their degree of fault is less than 50%. If the plaintiff's fault is found to be 50% or more, they are barred from recovering any damages.... More... $0 (03-05-2024 - MT)
|
|
Carlos Espinoza v. Jedidiah Fowler
|
|
Pierre, South Dakota personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
In South Dakota, car accident liability is primarily determined based on fault. This means that the party responsible for causing the accident is typically held liable for the resulting damages. This is because South Dakota follows a modified comparative negligence rule.
... More... $1 (03-05-2024 - SD)
|
|
Mena Lucas v. Larry Taylor, et al.
|
|
St. Louis, Missouri personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
This case was filed in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, 23SL-CC02908, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.
Missouri follows a comparative negligence principle which means even if you're partially at fault for an accident, you can still re... More... $1 (03-05-2024 - MO)
|
|
Austin Parker v. Elmer Lee McCollum and Gayle Frerichs Trucking, LLC
|
|
Austin, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.
This case was filed in the 480th Judicial District Court of Williamson Co. TX, 23-01341-C480, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.
Texas is a “modified” comparative negligence state. Under the Texas modified comparative negligence standard, plaintiff... More... $1 (03-05-2024 - TX)
|
|
Vanessa Doporto and Martin Rios v. Amazon Logistics, LLC
|
|
Fort Worth, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.
This case was filed in the 43rd District Court- Parker County, CV23-1283, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.
Texas is a “modified” comparative negligence state. Under the Texas modified comparative negligence standard, plaintiff... More... $1 (03-05-2024 - TX)
|
|
Courtney Coulon, et al. v. Rasier, LLC, et al.
|
|
Washington, DC personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.
This case was filed in the Superior Court for the District of Columbia, 2022 CA 000031 V, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.
Unlike most states, Washington D.C. is a contributory negligence state. Under contributory negligence rules, victims cannot ... More... $1 (03-05-2024 - DC)
|
|
Wendy Ratchford v. Manpreet Singh and Punj Aab Trucking, Inc.
|
|
Scranton, Pennsylvania personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.
This case was filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County, 24-CV-736, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.
Pennsylvania follows a 51 percent comparative negligence rule, which means you can recover damages if you were less than 51 p... More... $1 (03-05-2024 - PA)
|
|
Tawfik Atik v. Talisha Thomas and Rapid Transport, Inc.
|
|
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a auto negligence theory.
Pennsylvania follows a 51 percent comparative negligence rule, which means you can recover damages if you were less than 51 percent at fault. If you are found to carry more than 50 percent of the fault for the accident, you will be unable to seek compen... More... $0 (03-05-2024 - PA)
|
|
Hebert Simmons v. Aaron Dolney, et al.
|
|
Detroit, Michigan personal injury car wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
This case was filed in the Washtenaw County Circuit Court, 23-001633-NI, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.
The Plaintiff sought remand to the state court because the federal court lacked jurisdiction.
Michigan’s comparative negligence ... More... $0 (03-04-2024 - MI)
|
|
Matthew R. Richter v. Alexis Danielle Elliot
|
|
Austin, Texas personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
In Texas, we are a “modified” comparative negligence state. Under the Texas modified comparative negligence standard, you can sue for damages even if you are partially at fault for an accident. However, if you are found to be more than 50% to blame for an accident, you canno... More... $1 (03-04-2024 - TX)
|
|
Elijah Toler v. Edward Canterbury, III and Faircloth Roofing, Inc.
|
|
Charleston, West Virginia personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.
Under West Virginia's comparative negligence laws, an injury victim who is 50% or less at fault for an accident can recover compensation for their injuries. Their total amount of damages will then be reduced by the percentage that they were to blame for the accident.
... More... $1 (03-04-2024 - WV)
|
Next Page
|
