| Imputed Negligence Law |
| |
|
Angeleana Goebel v. Big Brothers Big Sisters of America Corporation
|
Tampa, Florida personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.
Under modified comparative negligence, people who suffer injuries due to negligence can only recover damages if they are found to be 50 percent or less responsible for their injuries. If somebody was hurt in the accident and is more than 50 percent at fault, the new law bars
More... $1 (07-11-2024 - FL)
|
|
Tony Mancini v. Long Island Rail Road Company
|
Central Islip, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Employer's Liability Act (FELA) theory.
45 U.S.C. 41 provides:
Every common carrier by railroad while engaging in commerce between any of the several States or Territories, or between any of the States and Territories, or between the District of Columbia and any of th
More... $1 (07-09-2024 - NY)
|
|
Deborah Boulac v. SMG
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.
A plaintiff in Oklahoma whose own negligence contributed to their injury, for instance, will have their damages reduced in proportion. And if the injured party was more negligent than the prospective defendant, he or she may not collect damages.
More... $0 (07-08-2024 - OK)
|
|
Douglas Cozort v. BNSF Railway Company
|
Springfield, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on Railroad Labor Act negligence theory.
49 U.S.c. 20202: The purpose of act is to promote safety in every area of railroad operations and reduce railroad-related accidents and incidents.
More... $0 (07-03-2024 - MO)
|
|
Deborah Ann Willis v. United States of America
|
Kansas City, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.
Missouri is a pure comparative negligence state, while it recognizes the legal doctrine of "comparative negligence." Under this doctrine, a plaintiff who is partially responsible for their own injuries may only collect damages in proportio
More... $0 (07-03-2024 - MO)
|
|
Tiffany L. Taylor v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, d/b/a Amtrak
|
Kansas City, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.
Missouri is a pure comparative negligence state, while it recognizes the legal doctrine of "comparative negligence." Under this doctrine, a plaintiff who is partially responsible for their own injuries may only collect damages in proportion to the defendant's degree o
More... $1 (07-03-2024 - MO)
|
|
Teresa Castro v. Walmart Stores, Inc., d/b/a Walmart Supercenter
|
Des Moines, Iowa personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.
Iowa property owners have a legal obligation to maintain safe conditions on their property. Both businesses and private citizens must eliminate hazards and unsafe conditions when they invite or license visitors to be on their property.
More... $1 (07-03-2024 - ia)
|
|
Andrew Slabon v. Philip Ladisa
|
Chicago, Illinois personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on intentional infliction of emotional distress theory.
Plaintiff also claimed defendant was stalking "young women [ sic ] tenants" residing in a nearby property that defendant "claims he 'manages.'" Plaintiff stated that while defendant claimed he was maintaining his property, defendant wa
More... $0 (07-05-2024 - IL)
|
|
Rayma C. Wright v. SF Markets, LLC d/b/a Sprouts Farmers Market
|
Las Vegas, Nevada personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.
This case was filed in the Eighth Judicial District, Clark County, Nevada, A-22-856164-C, and was removed to federal court by SF Markets, LLC d/b/a Sprouts Farmers Market
More... $1 (07-03-2024 - NV)
|
|
Rodney Whiddon v. C-Level Trucking, LLC, et al.
|
Dallas, Texas personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
This case was filed in the 13th Judicial Court of Navarro County, TX, C-22-30898-CV, and was removed to federal court by C-Level Trucking, LLC , et al.
Texas uses a modified form of comparative negligence (also known as "proportionate responsibility" in Texas)
More... $1 (07-03-2024 - TX)
|
|
Randall Thomas Bailey v. Sara Elizabeth Bailey
|
Cody, Wyoming family law lawyers represented the Plaintiff and Defendants in a custody and child support dispute.
[¶3] The parties married in 2005 and have three minor children. Ms. Larson filed a complaint for divorce in December 2022. The parties filed a stipulated request for a GAL, which the district court granted in March 2023. A temporary custody hearing pro
More... $0 (06-14-2024 - WY)
|
|
Donna Hahn v. Coby Keilty and Timothy Keilty
|
Charleston, South Carolina personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on negligence theories.
This case was filed in the Georgetown County Court of Common Pleas, 2023CP2200106, and was removed to federal court by by the Defendants.
More... $0 (07-03-2024 - SC)
|
|
Ferrell A. Hodges and Marquell L. Hodges v. Barbaro V. Garcia and Mega Trucking, LLC
|
Charleston, South Carolina personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.
In South Carolina, the negligence system is a "modified comparative negligence" system where you can collect even if you were partly at fault for the harm done to you.
More... $1 (07-03-2024 - SC)
|
|
Vitzeslav Zeif v. Marina Aslanyan and SmartLinux Solutions, LLC
|
Charleston, South Carolina personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.
This case was filed in the Charleston County Court of Common Pleas, 2024CP1001305, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.
The following facts are presented in SmartLinx Solutions, LLC's (“SmartLinx”) Verified Amended Complaint, and as
More... $0 (07-03-2024 - SC)
|
|
Sindy Maldonado v. United States of America
|
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.
Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of their official duties.
More... $0 (07-02-2024 - PA)
|
|
Gregory Bryan Eames and Patricia Eames v. Williams Sonoma, Inc.
|
Camden, New Jersey personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.
To prove negligence in a premises liability case in New Jersey, the injured party must establish several elements: Duty of Care: Demonstrate that the property owner owed a duty of care to the injured person. Breach of Duty: Show that the property owne
More... $1 (07-02-2024 - NJ)
|
|
James Edward Neumann v. United States of America
|
Albany, New York personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act medical malpractice negligence theory.
In New York, you may bring a medical malpractice lawsuit for an injury you suffered against a licensed healthcare provider based upon their negligence, misconduct, errors or omissions, or breach of contract in the rendering of h
More... $0 (07-01-2024 - NY)
|
|
David Luis Moreno v. Force Transportaton, Inc., et al.
|
Little Rock, Arkansas personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.
This case was filed in the St. Francis County Circuit Court, 62CV-23-00151-3, and was removed to federal court by Force Transportation, Inc.
According Arkansas law, if you're found to be less than 50% at fault in an accident, your portion of the fault
More... $1 (07-01-2024 - AR)
|
|
Janes Doe WHBE3, et al. v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al.
|
San Francisco, California personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on negligence theories.
In 2020, plaintiff Jane Doe (later to become identified as Jane Doe WHBE 3) filed suit against Uber Technologies, Inc. and Raiser, LLC, its wholly owned subsidiary (together, Uber) in San Francisco Superior Court for claims arising out of an incident in Hawaii in
More... $0 (06-24-2024 - CA)
|
|
David Carpenter, et al. v. Red Lion Trucking, et al.
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.
A party claiming damages has the burden of proving each of the following propositions:
First, that the Plaintiff has sustained injury;
Second, that the Defendant was negligent;
And, third, that such negligence was a direct cause of the injury sustained b
More... $1 (06-04-2024 - OK)
|
|
Alaine F. Espinosa Castillo v. Sanchez Rosario and C.R. England, Inc.
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.
A party claiming damages has the burden of proving each of the following propositions:
First, that the Plaintiff has sustained injury;
Second, that the Defendant was negligent;
And, third, that such negligence was a direct cause of the injury sustained b
More... $0 (06-10-2024 - OK)
|
|
Jamie Meyer v. Chyma Lumly
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory
A party claiming damages has the burden of proving each of the following propositions:
First, that the Plaintiff has sustained injury;
Second, that the Defendant was negligent;
And, third, that such negligence was a direct cause of the injury sustained by t
More... $1 (06-28-2024 - OK)
|
|
Joseph G. Lee and Stephanie Campos v. Miram Abunow, et al.
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on auto negligence and auto insurance theories.
A party claiming damages has the burden of proving each of the following propositions:
First, that the Plaintiff has sustained injury;
Second, that the Defendant was negligent;
And, third, that such negligence was a d
More... $1 (06-21-2024 - OK)
|
|
Christopher Kenned, et al. v. John Jay Schieber, et al.
|
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on an auto negligence theory.
A party claiming damages has the burden of proving each of the following propositions:
First, that the Plaintiff has sustained injury;
Second, that the Defendant was negligent;
And, third, that such negligence was a direct cause of the injury sust
More... $25000 (06-17-2024 - OK)
|
|
Brian R. Hamen, et al. v. Lisa Marie Thompson
|
Enid, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on auto negligence theories.
The first element of negligence is a duty of care. This means that the defendant had a legal obligation to act in a specific way to prevent harm or injury to the plaintiff. The second element is a breach of that duty of care. This establishes that the def
More... $1 (06-05-2024 - OK)
|
Next Page
|
