New Haven, Connecticut personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Connecticut is one of the many states that have comparative negligence laws. As long as an injured party was not more than 50 percent at fault, then he or she can file a personal injury suit against the parties responsible. This is considered a modified comparative law.

Charlotte, North Carolina personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Mecklenburg County Superior Court, 23-CVS-8020, and was removed to federal court by Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
also known as ADM Trucking, Inc.

The Plaintiff challenged the jurisdiction of the federal court and sought rema

Asheville, North Carolina personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

North Carolina negligence laws follow the doctrine of pure contributory negligence, which bars recovery by the plaintiff if they're just partially at fault (even as little as 1%).

Charlotte, North Carolina insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

This case was filed in the Mecklenburg County Superior Court, 18-CVS-1254
4th Circuit, 21-02165, Fourth, 24-01316, and was removed to federal court by AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company.

Under the North Carolina Unfair and Deceptive Trade P

Greensboro, North Carolina personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Guilford County Superior Court, 22CVS2439, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Property owners are responsible for conducting proper premises upkeep and maintenance, limiting dangerous conditions, and/or warning visitors of any ha

Greensboro, North Carolina personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

North Carolina negligence laws follow the doctrine of pure contributory negligence, which bars recovery by the plaintiff if they're just partially at fault (even as little as 1%).

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Plaintiff claimed that she was injured in a car wreck that occurred on October 21, 2021, caused by Defendant.

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a medical malpractice negligence theory.

Plaintiff claimed that M.D. underwent a complete atrioventrical canal repair and developed a pressure sore after the surgery from a bobble mask.

Alexandra, Virginia personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Virginia uses the pure contributory negligence rule. This is the harshest legal doctrine in personal injury cases involving negligence. The defendant must be 100% at fault for the accident that caused the plaintiff's injuries.

Roanoke, Virginia personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a medical malpractice negligence theory.

Roanoke, Virginia personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Pulaski County Circuit Court, CL23000187-00, and was removed to federal court by Flagship Facility Services, Inc..

Once it is establish the defendant had a duty of care towards plaintiff, plaintiff must then prove defendant breached that duty of care to

Roanoke, Virginia personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory claiming $350,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Virginia uses the pure contributory negligence rule. This is the harshest legal doctrine in personal injury cases involving negligence. The defendant must be 100% at fault for the accident that caused the plaintiff's injuries.

Dallas, Texas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a medical malpractice negligence theory.

This case was filed in the 101st District Court, Dallas County, TX, DC-20-11332, and was removed to federal court by Oasis Healthcare Partners, L.L.C., et al.

Ella Norman died on April 11, 2020-after contracting COVID-19 at Skyline Nursing Center, a skilled nursi

Fort Worth, Texas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a premises liability theory.

This case was filed in the County Court at Law No. 3, Tarrant County, Texas, 23-007899-3, and was removed to federal court by Kroger Texas, L.P.

A premises liability action is a form of “negligence” based on a
premises defect theory. The elements to e

Dallas, Texas personal injury slip and fall lawyers represent the plaintiff who sued on a premises liability theory.

This case was filed in the 44th District Court, Dallas County, Texas, DC-23-00826, and was removed to federal court by Ross Dress for Less, Inc.

A premises liability action is a form of “negligence” based on a
premises defect theory. The elements to establ

Fort Worth, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory claims to have suffered $250,000 in damages and/or injuries.

This case was filed in the 153rd Judicial District of Tarrant County, Texas, 153-349632-24, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Where Are 5 Elements of a Negligence case in Texas?

Dallas, Texas personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the 160th Judicial District Court, Dallas County, TX, DC-23-09533, and was removed to federal court by Quantem Aviation Services LLC and Anthony Buckley.

In Texas, negligent parties are held liable for any harms suffered due to their negligence. C

Abilene, Texas personal injury truck wrecks lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the 91st District Court, Eastland County, Texas, CV2246527, and was removed to federal court by FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. et al.

In Texas, negligent parties are held liable for any harms suffered due to their negligence. Commercial ent

Wilmington, Delaware personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on medical malpractice negligence theories.

Rebecca Roeper Jointly with Kirsten Monroe-Pitrizzi and on Behalf of the Estate of Suzanne Wickersham and Kirsten Monroe-Pitrizzi Jointly with Rebecca Roeper and on Behalf of the Estate of Suzanne Wickersham sued ProMedica Skilled Nursing and Rehabilitation (Pike Cre

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania person injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of their official duties.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act negligence theory.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of their official duties.

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.


In Pennsylvania, the comparative negligence system operates under the Modified Comparative Fault Rule, specifically the 51% Bar Rule. Under this rule, an accident victim can still recover damages even if they share some degree of fault for the accident, as lon

Scranton, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories claiming $1.06 million in damages.

A plaintiff can recover damages if they are less than 51% at fault. If they are found to carry more than 50% of the fault, they cannot seek compensation.

Duty of care: The legal requirement to act safely. Breach of duty of care: Failing

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

Section 7102 of the Pennsylvania General Assembly contains the state's modified comparative negligence rule. It states that the plaintiff's contributory negligence will not bar his or her recovery, as long as the negligence does not surpass the causal negligence of the defendant.

Wheeling, West Virginia personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

West Virginia premises liability laws apply a uniform standard of care requiring the exercise of reasonable care. An owner has a continuing duty to inspect the property to identify dangerous conditions and either repair them or post warnings as appropriate.