Miami, Florida personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence insurance law theory.

In this action was to recover uninsured motorist benefits, Melquiades Blanco (“Plaintiff”) filed a two-count Complaint against Progressive Express Insurance Company (“Defendant”) for breach of contract (Count I) and violation of Fla. Stat. § 624.155

San Diego, California personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

Negligence is the term that refers to an individual’s failure to behave with the level of care that someone of ordinary prudence would have exercised under the same circumstances. The behavior usually consists of actions, but can also consist of omissions when there is some duty to a

Binghamton, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

New York's contributory negligence law allows injured individuals to recover compensation for their injuries in proportion to the fault of others. Compensation is diminished by whatever percentage of fault is attributable to the injured party.

Newark, New Jersey personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

New Jersey is a modified comparative negligence state, which, under New Jersey law, means that the person asking for damages in a lawsuit has to be less responsible for the accident than the person who allegedly caused the accident.

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

A plaintiff can recover damages if they are less than 51% at fault. If they are found to carry more than 50% of the fault, they cannot seek compensation.

Greenbelt, Maryland personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

There are many different kinds of personal injury cases, including automobile negligence, medical malpractice, and products liability. Each type of personal injury case requires different skills and expertise for success. Because the evidence in these cases may require f

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act medical malpractice theory.

There is no Oklahoma statute that spells out exactly what injured patients must prove in their medical malpractice lawsuits. But the state's courts have held that, typically, the plaintiff must:

establish the existence of a provider-patient relat

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury care wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

A plaintiff in Oklahoma whose own negligence contributed to their injury, for instance, will have their damages reduced in proportion. And if the injured party was more negligent than the prospective defendant, he or she may not collect damages.

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming $215,000 in damages and/or injuries.

A plaintiff injured by a defendant’s wrongful act may file a tort lawsuit to recover money from
that defendant. To name a particularly familiar example of a tort, a person who negligently
causes a vehicular

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Elbert County District Court, 2023CV30014, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Colorado state law uses 50% modified comparative negligence. That means that if a driver is over 50% at fault for an accident, they give up their right to

Albuquerque, New Mexico personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Second Judicial District Court, D-202-CV-22-01715, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

New Mexico is a pure comparative negligence state. That means that fault can be shared among drivers, with each driver being assigned a perce

New Haven, Connecticut personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory claiming $925,000 in damages.

Connecticut is a comparative negligence state. Under this law, it's possible to recover damages in a car accident even if you are partially at fault. To do this, you must be under 50% at fault for the accident.

Bangor, Maine personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.

Maine follows the principle of comparative negligence, where a plaintiff's recovery may be reduced in proportion to their degree of fault. If the injured party is found to be 50% or more at fault, they may be barred from recovering damages.

Providence, Rhode Island personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

To be negligent is to act in a way that a similarly situated "reasonable person" would not, resulting in another person's injury. An "injury" may include loss or damage of property, emotional distress, and other losses resulting from the defendant's negligence in addition to physica

Worcester, Massachusetts personal injury lawyer represented the plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory claiming $212,000 in damages.

Massachusetts is a modified comparative negligence state with a 51% bar to recovery. Therefore, as long as you are less than 51% at fault for your injury, you can receive some money for your damages.

Burlington, Vermont personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on negligence theories.

Contributory negligence shall not bar recovery in an action by any plaintiff, or his or her legal representative, to recover damages for negligence resulting in death, personal injury, or property damage, if the negligence was not greater than the causal total negligence of the defendant

Portland, Maine personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Knox County Superior Court, CV-22-XX, and was removed to federal court by Lowe's Home Centers, LLC

In general, premises liability means that owners have a responsibility to take reasonable steps to ensure that their property is safe. When

Concord, New Hampshire personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a federal court claims act medical practice wrongful death negligence theory.

Concord, New Hampshire personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

Modified comparative negligence. A plaintiff 51% or more at fault cannot recover. A plaintiff 50% or less at fault can recover in proportion to their amount of fault.J

Marshall, Texas personal injury lawyer truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an auto negligence.

In Texas, negligent parties are held liable for any harms suffered due to their negligence. Commercial entities, such as rental car companies or ride sharing services, may also be found liable under some circumstances. Finally, strict liability laws may apply in certain cases, regard

Beaumont, Texas personal injury truck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence.

In Texas, negligent parties are held liable for any harms suffered due to their negligence. Commercial entities, such as rental car companies or ride sharing services, may also be found liable under some circumstances. Finally, strict liability laws may apply in certain cases, regardless

Opelika, Alabama personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of their official duties.

Montgomery, Alabama personal injury car wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

Alabama adopted a pure contributory negligence statute, which means a plaintiff is barred from recovering ANY damages if they're even 1 percent responsible for causing their accident. Let's look at an example of an Alabama contributory negligence auto accident: Raymond is

Mobile, Alabama personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on negligence theories.

This case was filed in an Dallas County Alabama circuit court and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Plaintiff challenged the jurisdiction of the court.

Diversity jurisdiction refers to the Federal court's jurisdiction over cases involving a cont

Savannah, Georgia personal injury wrongful death lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory seeking compensation for the death of the father of K.E., a minor.

This case was filed in the State Court of Chatham County, STCV22-00211, and was removed to federal court by The Kroger Co.

The state of Georgia defines wrongful death as being the death of a person c