Muskogee, Oklahoma personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.

Oklahoma's comparative negligence statute includes a so-called “50-percent rule.” In Oklahoma, the ability to pursue damages under comparative negligence applies when a crash victim is 49 percent or less liable for the accident.

Muskogee, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.

This was action for wrongful death brought by Plaintiff, Scott Phillips, the surviving spouse of Malinda Phillips, who was killed in a motor vehicle collision on January 26, 2018. Mrs. Phillips was traveling on W. Choctaw Street in Tahlequah while Aram Catron

Wichita, Kansas personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

Formed in 1995, The Waterfall Group, LLC has advised commercial real estate clients locally and nationally to maximize value and increase return on investment.

Kansas follows the comparative negligence rule. This rule means that if you are found to have contributed to

Wichita, Kansas personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Kansas follows the comparative negligence rule. This rule means that if you are found to have contributed to causing the accident in which you were injured, your compensation will be reduced by your percentage of fault.

Kansas City, Kansas personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence and wrongful death theories.

Kansas follows the comparative negligence rule. This rule means that if you are found to have contributed to causing the accident in which you were injured, your compensation will be reduced by your percentage of fault.

Drisco L.L.C. is a pri

Kansas City, Kansas personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

Kansas follows the comparative negligence rule. This rule means that if you are found to have contributed to causing the accident in which you were injured, your compensation will be reduced by your percentage of fault.

Cheyenne, Wyoming personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

If you were injured in a car accident in Wyoming and were driving, you will need to prove that the other driver was at least 50% “at fault” for your injuries in order to recover damages.

This is because the Wyoming court has adopted “modified comparative ne

Casper, Wyoming personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

“At Fault” and the “51% Bar” Rules in Wyoming Per this rule, the court allocates a percentage of fault to each driver involved in a car accident, and any driver 50% or less at fault is awarded damages, which are reduced according to that driver's percen

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Boulder County District Court, 2023CV30424, and was removed to federal court by Dillon Companies, LLC d/b/a King Soopers which which operates grocery stores in Colorado.

Premises liability is a unique form of a negligence action that holds owners of land r

Denver, Colorado personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Colorado state law uses 50% modified comparative negligence. That means that if a driver is over 50% at fault for an accident, they give up their right to receive compensation for damages. Other states throughout the country have similar regulations in place regarding traffic

Greeley, Colorado criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with vehicular homicide, carless driving, reckless driving, vehicular assault, a commercial vehicle violation, and driving without a CDL.

The State accused the Defendant of driving a 1999 Kenworth T800 Truck as an excessive speeding and running to a vehicle driven by Aaron Godienz, Halie Everts, Tessleigh and Aaro

Salt Lake City, Utah personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Utah has a comparative negligence law in place that has a 50 percent fault bar. This means that if you are at least half at fault, you will not retain anything from the accident. If you are at less than half at fault, you will receive a partial damage award.

St. George, Utah personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Utah has a comparative negligence law in place that has a 50 percent fault bar. This means that if you are at least half at fault, you will not retain anything from the accident. If you are at less than half at fault, you will receive a partial damage award.

Salt Lake City, Utah personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of their official duties.

Las Vegas, Nevada personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Eighth Judicial District Court, A-22-857398-C, and was removed to federal court by 99 Cents Only Stores, LLC.

The civil law of negligence is based upon the concept that a reasonably prudent person should act in a certain way. Negligence

Las Vegas, Nevada personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the District Court, Clark County, Nevada, A-22-855311-C, and was removed to federal court by Landstar System, Inc. et al.

Under Nevada law, a car accident victim can only recover damages if their percentage of fault is less than 50%. If a v

Las Vegas, Nevada personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the 8th Judicial District Court, A-22-853257-C, and was removed to federal court by Allied Van Lines, Inc. et al.

Under Nevada law, a car accident victim can only recover damages if their percentage of fault is less than 50%. If a victim is

Missoula, Montana personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

Montana follows a “modified” comparative negligence rule, which means that a plaintiff can recover damages only if their degree of fault is less than 50%. If the plaintiff's fault is found to be 50% or more, they are barred from recovering any damages.

Billings, Montana personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Montana follows a “modified” comparative negligence rule, which means that a plaintiff can recover damages only if their degree of fault is less than 50%. If the plaintiff's fault is found to be 50% or more, they are barred from recovering any damages.

Billings, Montana personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

Montana follows a “modified” comparative negligence rule, which means that a plaintiff can recover damages only if their degree of fault is less than 50%. If the plaintiff's fault is found to be 50% or more, they are barred from recovering any damages.

This case was filed

Boise, Idaho personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on Federal Tort Claims Act negligence theories.

Idaho follows the modified comparative negligence rule. Under this rule, a plaintiff (the injured party) can only recover damages if their percentage of fault is less than 50%. If the plaintiff is found to be 50% or more responsible for the accident, they cannot recover

Boise, Idaho personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filled in the Ada County District Court, CV01-23-05561, and was removed to federal court by FedEx Ground Package System, Inc.

Idaho follows the modified comparative negligence rule. Under this rule, a plaintiff (the injured party) can only recover damage

Seattle, Washington personal injury lawyer presented the Plaintiffs who sued on negligence theories.

This case was filed in the King County Superior Court, 24-00002-03365-3, and was removed to federal court by the University of Washington.

The jurisdiction of the court upon removal was challenged by the Plaintiffs.

Tacoma, Washington personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Pierce County District Court, 2A733747C, and was removed to federal court by Safway, Inc.

To establish liability against the property owner, you must prove three things: The property owner had a duty to protect you from harm, The prope

Seattle, Washington personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

This case was filed in the King County Superior Court, 17-00002-04219-6, and was removed by Seattle Tunnel Partners, et al.

If a person acts carelessly and injures someone as a direct result of that carelessness, the careless party must pay compensation to the injured party. “