Reed Timmer v. Medialinks TV, LLC |
Washington, DC intellectual property lawyer represent the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright violation theory under 17 U.S.C. 501. |
United States of America v. Dominic Lambert |
Nashville, Tennessee criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with cyberstalking. |
A.B. and A.M.B, et al. v. Hawaii State Department of Education and OAHU Interscholastic Association |
Honolulu, Hawaii civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on Title X class action violations. |
United States of America v. Zarzamora Healthcare LLC, doing business as Rite-Away Pharmacy & Medical Supply #2, and Jitendra Chaudhary, |
San Antonio, Texas civil litigation lawyer represented Defendants accused of wrongfully dispensing of opioids and other controlled substances. |
John C. Eastman v. Bennie Thompson |
Santa Ana, California civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant seeking an injunction against the Defendant to prevent it from responding to a subpeona which it received the the House Committing seeking production of email messages between Donald Trump and the Plaintiff. |
Jenna M. DiMartile, et al. v. Kathleen Hochul, et al. |
Albany, New York civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants challenging the legality of regulations relating to the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. |
Elevance Health, Inc. v. Vinod Mohan |
Indianapolis, Indiana commercial litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a misappropriation of trade secrets theory. |
Edward Pollner, et al. v. Tri-State Tournaments, LLC |
Central Islip, New York commercial litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a breach of contract theory claiming $200,000 as a direct result of the breach. |
Norman Danielewicz v. Flagship Bank Minnesota, N.A. |
Minneapolis, Minnesota consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a breach of fiduciary duty theory. |
Constance Iloh v. Regents of the University of California, et al. |
Santa Ana, California employment law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant seeking a writ of mandate, declaratory relief and injunctive relief. |
Jacqueline Damon v. Navsav Holdings, LLC |
Omaha, Nebraska employment law lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued her former employer challenging a restrictive covenant in an employment contract. |
United States of America v. Jonathan Trayes |
Portland, Maine criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with cyberstalking. |
Raymond Stinde v. Joshua Schoenbeck, et al. |
East St. Louis, Illinois civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on prisoner civil rights violation theories. |
United States of America v. Tyler James Stephens |
Muskogee, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with stalking, attempted first degree burglary in Indian Country, attempted sexual abuse, first degree burglary and coercion and enticement. |
Zvitaliy Strizheus v. The City of Sioux Falls, South Dakota |
Sioux Falls, South Dakota civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants taking of property without just compensation. |
Andrew T. Miller v. William K. Marshall, et al. |
Charleston, West Virginia civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant seeking an injunction |
Oregon Firearms Federation, et al. v. Tina Kotek, et al. |
Before this Court are two core questions: (1) can the State of Oregon limit the number of bullets to ten, that a law-abiding citizen can fire without reloading; and (2) can the State of Oregon require firearm purchasers to obtain a permit, which imposes various requirements, including a completed background check, safety training, and consideration of mental health status, before purchasing a fire... More... $0 (07-14-2023 - OR) |
Donald Thomas Sharp v. S. Hampton |
Albuquerque, New Mexico pro se Plaintiff sued Defendant without a lawyer on a civil rights theory. |
Erik Garcia v. Sopros Investments Corporation |
Houston, Texas civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant alleging violations of the Americans With Disabilities Act. |
Brooke Clark v. A&L Homecare and Training Center, LLC, et al. |
Cincinnati, Ohio employment law lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant on a Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) violation theory. |
Ronald Koons, et al. v. Matthew Platkin, et al. |
Camden, New Jersey civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on a Second Amendment violation theory claiming that New Jersey's firearm laws are unconstitutional. |
Angela V. Goodall v. Beth Casper, et al. |
Louisville, Kentucky pro se Plaintiff sued Defendants on a federal question theory. |
Aurora Pride v. City of Aurora, et al. |
Chicago, Illinois civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff, which sued Defendant challenging Defendant's special events ordinance and seeking an injunction. |
Ryan Dumas v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc. |
West Palm Beach, Florida consumer law lawyer represent Plaintiff who sued defendant on a Telephone Consumer Protection Act violation theory under 47 U.S.C. 227, which provides, in part: |
Luis Ortiz Hernandez v. Ruth Sarai Erazo |
San Antonio, Texas family law lawyers represented Petition and Respondent in a matter involving an application for an order returning a child to Mexico pursuant to the Hague Convention. |
Next Page |