| Tariq Farooq v. Nucor Business Technology, Inc. and Capgemini America, Inc. |
|
Dallas, Texas, pro se Plaintiff attempted to represent himself without a lawyer on an employment discrimination case. |
| United States of America v. Daniel Ray Lane and Zhenyu Wang, a/k/a Bill Wang |
|
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiring and attempting to engage in and engaging in transactions regarding sanctioned Iranian oil, in violation of 50 U.S.C. §§ 1701-1707 (the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA)) and 18 U.S.C. § 371, and for money laundering conspiracy, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h). $0 (11-20-2025 - PA) |
| Stacy Hovan v. Metroploitan Life Insurance Company |
|
Miami, Florida, employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a an ERISA law theory. |
| State of Kansas v. Sultan Y. Andemichael |
|
Topeka, Kansas criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with nvoluntary manslaughter; recklessley; Failure to stop accident; result in death; and Interference with law enforcement officer; conceal/alter/destroy evidence in felony case. |
| United States of America v. Jermel Rush |
|
St. Louis, Missouri, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with interference with commerce by robbery and use and carry a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence. |
| United States of America v. E'mari Yatel Stancle |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: |
| United States of America v. Omar Ayyash |
|
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with a Hobbs Act robbery and brandishing and discharging a firearm in relation to a crime of violence. |
| United States of America v. Paul David Mitchell, II |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with two counts of bank rubbery. |
| John Hogner v. State of Oklahoma |
|
¶1 Appellant Travis John Hogner was charged and tried by jury for Feloniously Pointing a Firearm (21 O.S.Supp.2012, § 1289.16) or in the alternative Domestic Assault with a Dangerous Weapon (21 O.S.Supp.2014, § 644) (Count I); Possession of a Firearm, After Former Conviction of a Felony (21 O.S. Supp.2014, § 1283) (Counts II and III); Kidnapping (21 O.S.Supp.2012, § 751 (Count V); Interferenc $0 (03-11-2021 - OK) |
| United States of America v. Sean Christian Parker |
|
Greensboro, North Carolina, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with attempted interference with commerce by robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 1951(a). |
| United States of America v. Crandall Speights |
|
Wilmington, Delaware criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with stealing checks out of the mail. |
| United States of America v. Martin Aispuro-Lopez, Victor Manuel Felix-Ramirez |
|
Albuquerque, New Mexico criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with Drug Trafficking and Firearms Offenses. |
| United States of America v. Joya M. Kinney |
|
Omaha, Nebraska criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Production of Child Pornography. |
| United States of America v. Martin Aispuro-Lopez, Victor Manuel Felix-Ramirez |
|
Albuquerque, New Mexico criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Drug Trafficking and Firearms Offenses. |
| Jack Nicklaus v. Nicklaus Companies, LLC |
|
West Palm Beach, Florida personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a defamation theory. |
| United States of America v. Dylan Ray Alexander |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Second Degree Murder in Indian Country, Carrying, Using, Brandishing, and Discharging a Firearm During and in Relation to a Crime of Violence, and Felon in Possession of a Firearm and Ammunition. |
| United States of America v. Briauna Adams |
|
Kansas City, Missouri criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with fraudulent Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans being issued under the Coronavirus Aid and Economic Security (CARES) Act, and more than $3,000,000 in stolen Treasury checks. |
| United States of America v. Haitem Taylor Abid |
|
Honolulu, Hawaii, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with fraud by wire, radio or television in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, which provides: |
| United States of America v. Estate of Anthony Ray Lopez, Sr. v. City of Oontairo, et al. |
|
San Bernardino, California personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs on 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil rights violation theory. |
| United States of America v. Edward Constantinescu, et al. |
|
Houston, Texas, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with securities fraud for their involvement in a “pump and dump” scheme. |
| United States of America v. Leslie Mangual |
|
White Plains, New York, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with interference with commerce by threat or violence. $0 (10-10-2025 - NY) |
| United States of America v. Berk Eratay, Jerry Banks, Aron Ethridge |
|
Burlington, Vermont criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with Murder-for-Hire. |
| United States of America v. Daniel Michael Harris |
|
Greenbelt, Maryland criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with four armed robberies while using, carrying, and brandishing a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence. |
| Tom Daley, et al. v. Toyota Motor North America, Inc. |
|
Burlington, Vermont consumer law lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a fraud theory. |
| United States of America v. Jade Price |
|
South Bend, Indiana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with wire fraud |
|
Next Page |