Clifford Perkins v. Greater Bridgeport Transit Authority |
New Haven, Connecticut civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a civil rights violation theory under 42 U.S.C. 1983. |
United States of America v. Joseph Oluwafemi Kolawole Akoshile |
Atlanta, Georgia criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with tax fraud scheme relating to false tax returns claiming fuel tax credits. |
United States of America v. John Wilson |
Boston, Massachusetts criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with falsely claiming payments he made to secure the admission of his son to the University of Southern California (USC) were deductible from his taxes as a business expense and a charitable contribution. |
United States of America v. The Cigna Group |
Nashville, Tennessee civil litigation lawyers represented the Defendant accused of violating the False Claims Act by submitting to the Government false and invalid patient diagnosis codes to artificially inflate the payments CIGNA received for providing insurance coverage to its Medicare Advantage plan members. |
Jane Doe v. Richard MacLeod, et al. |
Chicago, Illinois civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983. |
Crystal L. Wickersham v. Ford Motor Company |
Beaufort, South Carolina personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on product liability and wrongful death theories. |
United States of America v. Isaac Lamont Dawson |
Raleigh, North Carolina criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with fraudulently obtaining Paycheck Protection Act (“PPP”) COVID-19 loans on behalf of two separate businesses he owned. |
Robert D'Agostini v. Empress Ambulance Service, LLC |
White Plaintiffs class action lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defndants |
Dorthy Beauval v. The City of New York |
New York City, New York civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories under 42 U.C.S. 1983. |
Norman Jenkins v. City of New York, et al. |
New York City, New York pro se Plaintiff filed suit without a lawyer claiming the Defendants on civil rights violations under 42 U.S.C. 1983. |
United States of America v. Carlos Alberto Padron |
Miami, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. 4999, which provides is part: |
United States of America v. Gina Suzanne Lonestar |
Oakland, California criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with a wire fraud scheme pursuant to which she embezzled over $1.7 million from her former employer. |
Glenn R. Simmons v. Joe Allbaugh |
Petitioner, Glynn R. Simmons, is an Oklahoma state prisoner appearing pro se in this matter. However, at the time the Petition was filed and through the filing of his Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Petitioner appeared through counsel, Rand Eddy. The Court granted Mr. Eddy leave to withdraw his appearance after the Objection was filed. See Order [Doc. No. 28] (J. Mil $0 (07-23-2019 - OK) |
Barry Michael Pratt, Jr. v. Deputy Cearly and Lieutenant Billy Perry |
El Dorado, Arkansas pro se Plaintiff without a lawyer sued the Defendants on a prisoner civil rights violation theory. |
Elevance Health, Inc. v. Vinod Mohan |
Indianapolis, Indiana commercial litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a misappropriation of trade secrets theory. |
United States of America v. Crystal A. Huang |
Salt Lake City, Utah criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with securities fraud. |
United States of America v. Keveny Rosier |
Boise, Idaho criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with aiding and assisting in the preparation and prsentation of a false and fraudulent tax return, statement or other document. |
Isaiah Rider v. The Young Men's Christian Association of Greater Kansas City |
Kansas city, Missouri personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on an premises liablity negligence theory. |
Daniel F. Hoemke and Laura L. Hoemoke v. Macy's West Stores, LLC |
Phoenix, Arizona |
United States of America v. Marie Um |
Fargo, North Dakota criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute and distribute controlled substances and controlled substance analogues resulting in serious bodily injury and death; conspiracy to import controlled substances and controlled substance analogues resulting in serious bodily injury and death; and international money la $0 (09-06-2023 - ND) |
United States of America v. Omarion Franklin |
Chicago, Illinois criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with carjacking. |
Yamilet Rodriguez v. Aerovias De Mexico, S.A., DE C.V., et al. |
Chicago, Illinois personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a negligence theory. |
Carlos Ocampo v. Timothy D. Sickmeyer and Janel L. Forde |
Chicago, Illinois pro se Plaintiff attempted to represent himself with a lawyer on a civil rights violation theory. |
United States of America v. Kendall A. Mack, Rasheem McCree and Adrian Lamont Morris |
Peoria, Illinois criminal defense lawyers represented Defendants charged with making false statements related to the federal Paycheck Protection Program (PPP). |
United States of America v. Jeremy Dewayne Hawkins |
Baton Rouge, Louisiana criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with |
Next Page |