Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

LEWD MOLESTATION, in violation of 21 O.S. 1123(A)
and
LEWD MOLESTATION, in violation of 21 O.S. 1123(A)

A. It is a felony for any person to knowingly and intentionally:

1. Make any oral, written or electronically or computer-generated lewd or indecent proposal to any child under sixt

Cordell, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Lewd or Indecent Acts to a Child Under Sixteen, in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2018, § 1123.

2023 OK CR 1, 526 P.3d 46:

¶4 The challenged evidence here met all of the factors required for admissibility under 12 O.S.2011, § 2414. In Horn v. State, 2009 OK CR 7, ¶ 40, 204 P.3d 777, 786, we required

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with f Rape in the First Degree in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2011, § 1114(A).

2022 OK CR 25, 519 P.3rd 526:

¶3 On the evening of October 20, 2017, M.P. went to Appellant's apartment and joined Appellant and other friends playing games and drinking. A.L, Appellant's girlfriend who also lived in the

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Sexual Abuse of a Child Under 12 (Count 1),1 in violation of 10 O.S.Supp.2002, § 7115.

2019 OK CR 23, 450 P.3d 969:

3 Proposition I: Brewer asserts the trial court erred in admitting the propensity testimony of A.K., J.H., L.R.N., and P.E.S. Brewer specifically contends the trial court abused its dis

Norman, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendant charged with , for First Degree Rape in violation of 21 O.S.2001, § 1114(A)(3) (Count 1), and First Degree Rape by Instrumentation in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2007, § 1111.1 (Count 2).

2012 OK CR 7, 274 P.3d 161:


¶10 At trial, the State introduced evidence about an unrelated burglary at a residence of the

Wichita, Kansas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with recept and possession of child pornography.

Defendant decided to peruse Tumblr one night and found himself looking at a six-year-old boy’s genitals. Using the handle “tobeautifullwomen,” he chatted with Kyle Enzminger, whose handle was “kinkyolder53,” on the social media platform.
They discussed t

Las Cruces, New Mexico criminal defense lawyer represented the Deendant charged with production of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2251(a), 2256(2)(A).

The Defendant entered to a plea agreement with the Government.

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

FORCIBLE SODOMY, in violation of 21 O.S. 888

A. Any person who forces another person to engage in the detestable and abominable crime against nature, pursuant to Section 886 of this title, upon conviction, is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment in the custody of the Department of Correctio

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with:

SEXUAL ABUSE - CHILD UNDER 12, in violation of 21 O.S. 843.5 (F)


F. Any person responsible for the health, safety or welfare of a child who shall willfully or maliciously engage in child sexual abuse, as defined in this section, to a child under twelve (12) years of age shall, upon conviction,

Wilmington, Delaware criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with coercion and enticement of a minor.
Delaware Man Sentenced To 240 Months For Coercing 11-Year-Old New Jersey Resident To Travel To Delaware For Sexual Activity

DIowa City, Iowa criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with receiving child pornography.

The final Presentence Investigation Report (“PSR”) calculated an advisory sentencing guidelines range of 262 to 327 months’ imprisonment. maximum sentence for the single-count offense was 240 months’ imprisonment. Id. § 2252A(b)(1). Because the statutory maximum sentence w

Omaha, Nebraska criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with one count of attempted production of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a) and 2251(e).

In October 2020, Wilson moved into a house with his then-girlfriend and her
two minor children, including her daughter B.Z. Wilson and his girlfriend stayed in
one bedroom, while B.Z. and the other m

Orlando, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with Distribution Of Child Sex Abuse Material
Orlando Man Pleads Guilty To Distribution Of Child Sex Abuse Material

Miami, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with International Fraud Scheme
Nigerian National Pleads Guilty to International Fraud Scheme that Defrauded Elderly U.S. Victims

Boise, Idaho criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with Possessing Child Sex Abuse Material

Weiser Man Sentenced to 14 Years in Federal Prison for Possessing Child Sex Abuse Material

Sacramento, California criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with Attempted Sexual Exploitation of Two Minors

Stanislaus County Man Indicted for Attempted Sexual Exploitation of Two Minors

Des Moines, Iowa criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with producing child pornography

Blue Grass Man Sentenced to 216 Months in Federal Prison for Possession of Child Pornography

Cleveland, Ohio criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Receipt and Distribution of Visual Depictions of Real Minors Engaged in Sexually Explicit Conduct and Possession of Child Pornography.

In 2022, an Iowa Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force investigated the peer-to-peer file-sharing network BitTorrent and found Eloshway’s IP address associated with seve

Amarillo, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm.

18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1) is a federal law that prohibits individuals convicted of felonies from possessing firearms. Specifically, it makes it unlawful for any person "who has been convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding on

San Angelo, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with production of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. 225

18 U.S.C. § 225 outlines the federal crime of engaging in a Continuing Financial Crimes Enterprise (CFCE). It specifically targets individuals who organize, manage, or supervise a series of financial crimes, and who personally receive substantial

Rockville, Maryland family law lawyers represented the parties in divorce.

The parties were married on August 18, 2001. At the time of the trial in 2023, Wife was 55 years old, and Husband was 57 years old.

Four children were born as a result of the marriage. At the time of the trial, the oldest child (born in 2003) was a college student. The second child was born in 2005, the t

Harrrisburg, Virginia criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with abduction, felony eluding, and driving after being declared a habitual offender.

On the evening of November 27, 2018, Officer Brandon Mawyer was patrolling in his police cruiser in the City of Waynesboro when he received a "be on the lookout" alert for a "possibly-abducted female ... named Morgan Hammer."

Richmond, Virginia criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with violating a protective order.

On November 24, 2018, L.M. obtained a permanent protective order against appellant, with whom she had a young son. The protective order prohibited appellant from having "contact of any kind with" L.M. except as permitted by a custody or visitation order and from "commit[ting] ac

Knoxville, Tennessee family law lawyer represented the Defendant in a divorce action.

* * *

APPELLATE PROCEDURE. FINAL JUDGMENT REQUIREMENT. The case addresses whether the appellant could pursue an appeal in the absence of a final judgment from the trial court, which is a prerequisite for an appeal as of right according to court rules.

APPELLATE PROCEDURE. JURISDICTION.