Minneapolis, Minnesota domestic terrorist criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant, Michael Hari, age 49, who was charged with Intentionally Defacing, Damaging, and Destroying any Religious Real Property Because of the Religious Character of that Property; Intentionally Obstructing, and Attempting to Obstruct, by Force and the Threat of Force, the Free Exercise of Religious Beliefs; Conspira... More...   $0 (12-10-2020 - MN)

Miami, Florida - Liability Attorney, destruction of healthy residential citrus trees


This case arises from the destruction of healthy residential citrus trees located
within 1900 feet of a citrus tree infected with citrus canker, a bacterial infection
causing lesions on the leaves, stems, and fruit. These healthy trees were destroyed
by the Department as part of the CC... More...   $0 (10-06-2020 - FL)

Paulding, MS - Criminal Defense Attorney, POST-CONVICTION RELIEF


¶2. In 2016, Waters was indicted for first-degree murder, accessory to murder after the
fact, and possession of a firearm by a felon. He later pled guilty to second-degree murder.
The remaining charges were nolle prosequied. The circuit court sentenced Waters to thirty
years in the custody of the Mississip... More...   $0 (10-01-2020 - MS)

Santa Cruz County law enforcement officers seized more than 2,000 marijuana
plants from a medical marijuana dispensary for violating a local ordinance restricting
cannabis cultivation. When the dispensary sued to recover the marijuana, the county
asserted it had no obligation to return the plants since the dispensary violated the
ordinance. The trial court agreed and sustained the ... More...   $0 (08-06-2020 - CA)

California’s Eminent Domain Law (Code Civ. Proc.,
§ 1230.010 et seq.)
1 —and, in particular, Code of Civil Procedure
section 1245.245—provides that when “[p]roperty acquired by a
public entity [through eminent domain] . . . is not used for [its
intended] public use . . . within 10 years of adoption of the
resolution of necessity [that authorized its taking],” the entity
... More...   $0 (07-31-2020 - CA)

Stanford Vina Ranch Irrigation Company (Stanford Vina) sued the State Water
Resources Control Board (the Board), among other defendants, challenging the Board’s
issuance of certain temporary emergency regulations in 2014 and 2015, during the height
of one of the most severe droughts in California’s history. The challenged regulations
established minimum flow requirements on three t... More...   $0 (07-07-2020 - CA)