Inverse Condemnation Law
 
United States of America v. Approximately $42,323.00 in U.S. Currency

Sacramento, California criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant in a forfeiture action.

WHEREAS, a Verified Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem was filed November 15, 2024, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, alleging that the Approximately $42,323.00 in U.S. Currency (“Defendant Currency”) is subject to forfeiture to the United States pur... More...
   $0 (12-20-2024 - CA)

Merle D. Brendeland v. Iowa Department of Transportation


Nevada, Iowa eminent domain law lawyer represented the Plaintiffs on an inverse condemnation theory.


Several individuals owned a tract of land abutting an east-west highway near that highway's intersection with Interstate 35. When the Iowa Department of Transportation (DOT) announced plans to modernize the interchange between the highway and I-35, these landowners saw a deve... More...
   $0 (11-22-2024 - IA)

Juan Manuel Aguilar, et al. v. Suegundo A. Aponte Caceda, et al.

Dodge City, Kansas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants.

On August 11, 2020, KDOT offered to pay the Apontes $63,605 to establish a right-of-way on property they owned along Highway 50 near Dodge City and to reimburse for damages that would occur during an impending highway expansion. The Apontes ultimately accepted the offer and signed a contract of ... More...
   $0 (10-25-2024 - KS)

STATE OF KANSAS v. CHRISTOPHER D. KEMMERLY

cty, st criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant the right to self-representation



On the evening of February 17, 2019, Justin Gaston got out of a white Cadillac in
the parking lot of a motel in Wichita. One of the ... More...
   $0 (07-26-2024 - KS)

State of Oklahoma ex rel. Department of Transportation v. West Bank Storages, LLC

Tulsa, Oklahoma condemnation lawyer Andrew A. Shank represented the Defendant who was sued on an eminent domain theory by the Oklahoma Department of Transportation theory seeking to take the storage business for used to expand Interstate I-44 in West Tulsa.

The Commissioners appointed by t... More...
   $1371000 (05-22-2024 - OK)

STATE OF KANSAS, v. HUMBERTO L. PALACIO JR.

Topeka, Kansas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with one count of indecent liberties with a child, two counts of aggravated assault, and one count criminal possession
of a firearm

Palacio now appeals the indecent liberties with a child conviction, raisin... More...
   $0 (05-17-2024 - KS)

STATE OF KANSAS v. TRAVIS D. SMITH

Topeka, Kansas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with disputing the evidence of bodily harm supporting the aggravated kidnapping conviction.

The appellate lawyer further argues that the district court failed to adequately
consider Smith's financial circums... More...
   $0 (05-17-2024 - KS)

STATE OF KANSAS v. CHARITY BLACKMON

Topeka, KS criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant with challenging the district court's denial of her presentence motion to withdraw her plea and her motion for a durational or dispositional
sentencing departure. .



The State charged Blackmon on March 30, 2... More...
   $0 (04-19-2024 - KS)

STATE OF KANSAS v. CHARITY BLACKMON

Topeka, Kansas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with first-degree, premeditated murder and criminal possession of a firearm by a felon



The State charged Blackmon on March 30, 2021, with first-degree, premeditated
murder and crimina... More...
   $0 (04-19-2024 - KS)

United States of America v. Mason Shepherd

NALBANDIAN, Circuit Judge. Mason Shepherd admitted to possessing several
thousand images and videos of child pornography and pleaded guilty to one count of receipt and
No. 18-3993 United States v. Shepherd Page 2
distribution of child pornography under 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a)(2). The district court sentenced
Shepherd to 96 months in prison and six years of supervised release and al... More...
   $0 (12-28-2023 - OH)

City of Tulsa v. Geraldine Hunt, et al.

Tulsa, Oklahoma condemnation lawyer represented the Defendants sued eminent domain theories to acquire certain rights, title and interests owned by them in real property needed by the City of Tulsa for public purposes.

The commissioners appoint by the court reported that they were of the opinion that the defendant has suffered $2,000 in damages as a result of the imposition of a permanent... More...
   $0 (11-15-2023 - OK)

Joseph Blacker and Andrea Memiki Ambrosia v. Bay Bridge Marina Slips, LLC, et al.

Baltimore, Maryland personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on an admiralty law theory under 28 U.S.C. 1333, which provides:

The district courts shall have original jurisdiction, exclusive of the courts of the States, of:
(1) Any civil case of admiralty or maritime jurisdiction, saving to suitors in all cases all other remedies to which they are other... More...
   $1 (11-13-2023 - MD)

Norma Anderson, et al. v. Jena Griswold, in her official capacity as Colorado Secretary of State and Donald J. Trump

Denver, constitutional law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant seeking a declaratory judgment that Donald Trump violated the 14th Amendment on January 5, 2021 and should be barred from serving as President again.

Petitioners Norma Anderson, Michelle Priola, Claudine Cmarada, Krista Kafer, Kathi
Wright, and Christopher Castilian, eligible Colorado electors, bring t... More...
   $0 (09-15-2023 - CO)

Talala Properties, LLC v. City of El Reno, OKlahoma

El Reno, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff which sued Defendant claiming wrongful condemnation of its property and wrongful issuance of a notice to vacate Plaintiff's property.... More...   $0 (06-19-2023 - OK)

City of Tulsa v. Arnett Starks, et al.

Tulsa, Oklahoma condemnation law lawyer represented the Defendants who were sued by the Plaintiff on an eminent domain law theory seeking to acquire by the exercise of eminent domain certain rights, title and interest o real property owned by the Defendants for public use.

The Commissioners appointed by the Court assessed the damages caused as a direct result of the taking at $19,500.00.<... More...
   $0 (05-09-2023 - OK)

City of Oklahoma City v. David Furman Cosper

Norman, Oklahoma condemnation lawyers represented Defendants who were sued by Plaintiff seeking to acquire by eminent domain certain rights, title and interests in their land for public used.

... More...
   $0 (05-01-2023 - OK)

Richard & Wendy Devillier, et al. v. State of Texas

Houston, Texas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a taking of private property without just compensation (inverse condemnation) in violation of the Texas and United States Constitutions.

This case was filed in the 253rd Judicial District Court of Chambers County, 20-DCV-0300, and was removed to the federal court by the State of Texas.

The... More...
   $0 (04-10-2023 - TX)

Richard DeVillier, et al. v. State of Texas

Houston, Texas eminent domain lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant on an inverse condemnation theory.

This case was filed in the 253rd Judicial District Court of Chambers County, 20-DCV-0300, and was removed to federal court by the State of Texas.

Property Owners filed suits in Texas state courts claiming that the flooding of their land by the State of Texas constitu... More...
   $0 (03-23-2023 - TX)

Perry Bonin, et al. Sabine River Authority of Texas, et al.

Beaumont, Texas civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Sabine River Authority of Texas, et al. on inverse condemnation theories.





Federal Courthouse - Beaumont, Texas


Federal Courthouse - Beaumont, Texas


More...   $0 (02-13-2023 - )

Navigator SMS Pipeline, LLC v. Randal D. Haley

El Reno, condemnation lawyers represented the parties in an eminent domain case involving the accusation of certain rights, title and interest in real property for use in the construction and operation of a pipeline.




More...
   $65000 (01-04-2023 - OK)

City of Broken Arrow, Oklahoma v. James Michael Ritz, a/k/a J. Michael Reitz, trustee, et al.

Tulsa, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyer represented Defendants who were sued on eminent domain law theories seeking to acquire by condemnation certain rights, title and interest in real property owned by Defendants for street right-0f-way.

The commissioners appoint by the Court awarded Defendants $95,000.

... More...
   $0 (11-28-2022 - OK)

The State of Texas v. Marco Antonio Moreno

Houston, Texas – Criminal Defense lawyer represented defendant with a aggravated assault with a deadly weapon charge.


On April 18, 2012, a grand jury indicted Moreno for aggravated assault with
a deadly weapon (the “assault charge”). The same day, the grand jury also indicted
Moreno on an unrelated charge... More...
   $0 (11-24-2022 - TX)

Allen Flores; Shark Ventures, Inc. d/b/a Shark Shack; Bliss, Inc. d/b/a Bliss Lounge; and Barfly Lounge, Inc. d/b/a Playground Patio Bar v. The City of Galveston, Texas and Yaga's Entertainment, Inc. and Brian Maxwell, in his Official Capacity only

Houston, Texas – Civil Litigation lawyer represented Appellants with seeking injunctive and declaratory relief barring the performance of a contract.



The contract that is the subject of this appeal is the Galveston Mardi Gras
Promoter Agreement 2016-18 (the “Contract”) regarding the City’s selection of More...
   $0 (11-23-2022 - TX)

Harris County Fresh Water Supply District No. 61 v. Magellan Pipeline Company, L. P. and V-Tex Logistics LLC

Houston, Texas – Civil Litigation lawyer represented Appellant with rather governmental entity is immune from a suit to condemn a portion of its property for an easement.



A. The Pipeline Project
Magellan Pipeline Company, LP and V-Tex Logistics, LLC are pipeline
companies, and each owns its own pipeline syst... More...
   $0 (11-23-2022 - TX)

City of Owasso v. Key Plus Properties, LLC, et al.

Tulsa, Oklahoma condemnation lawyer represented Defendant sued by Plaintiff on an eminent domain theory seeking to obtain some right, title and interest in real property owned by Defendant for public use and convenience.

Matt Mardis, George O'Connor and Max Tankersley were appointed commissioners to assess the compensation due to Defendant as a result of the taking in the amount of $403,8... More...
   $0 (09-30-2022 - OK)

Next Page

Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: