Tulsa, OK - the Tulsa Development Authority sued Charles R. Sturner on an eminent domain theory seeking to acquire by condemnation certain rights, title and interests in real property owned by Mr. Sturner for public use.

Docket
Date Code Description Count Party Amount
02-17-2011 TEXT

Civil Misc. Initial Filing.
1
02-17-2011 CONDEMN

COND

In this appeal, we are once again faced with the “knotty” issue of whether a
plaintiff’s claim is a health care liability claim (“HCLC”) under the Texas Medical Liability
Act (“TMLA”) and therefore subject to that statute’s expert report requirement. See TEX.
CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 74.351 (West, Westlaw through 2013 3d C.S.); Loaisiga
v. Cerda, 379 S.W.3d 24

This case requires us to determine whether the Kansas saving statute applies to appeals from appraisers' awards in eminent domain proceedings. Landowner David Neighbor timely filed his appeal under K.S.A. 2014 Supp. 26-508, and the district court later granted his motion to dismiss it without prejudice. About 5 months later Neighbor appealed again, relying upon K.S.A. 60-518 to save the appeal fro

Lawton, OK - State of Oklahoma, ex. rel Department of Transporation charge C. Keith Landers, Cindy Hardzog Landers f/k/a Cindy Siebold f/k/a Tiny Hardzog a/k/a Tiny M. Hardzog claiming:

Issue # 1. Issue: CONDEMNATION (CONDEMN)
Filed By: STATE OF OKLAHOMA
Filed Date: 06/14/2013
Party Name Disposition Information
Disposed: JUDGEMENT ENTERED, 04/03/2015. Judge
Dock

¶1 Plaintiffs/Appellees (collectively, the Meines) commenced this action in the Fifth
Judicial District Court, Beaverhead County, against Defendants/Appellants (collectively,
the Hrens) seeking a determination that they hold a prescriptive easement over the Hrens’
land and a permanent injunction prohibiting the Hrens from blocking or impeding the use
of this easement. Following

In eminent domain actions, the law directs the parties to exchange formal settlement proposals prior to trial. (Code of Civ. Proc., § 1250.410, subd. (a).)1 If, after trial, the property owner’s statutory demand for compensation is found to be reasonable and the condemning agency’s statutory offer unreasonable, then the property owner is entitled to recover litigation expenses. (§ 1250.410,

Chris Kohler appeals from a grant of summary judgment
to defendant Bed Bath & Beyond of California (“BB&B”) on
Kohler’s claims under Title III of the Americans with
Disabilities Act (“ADA”), and also appeals the award of
attorneys’ fees and costs to BB&B as a prevailing defendant.
Regarding summary judgment, Kohler contends that the
district court erred in concl

Tulsa County, OK - Tulsa trial lawyer Kent Morlan the property owners against the Oklahoma Department of Transportation's action to acquire certain rights, title and interests from Floyd R. Hardest, Charles Arthur Lomon, Mercer James Bainbridge, Linda Gayle Lomon, and Lomon Sand and Gravel Com

In this appeal from the judgment of a Harris County civil court at law, no
one challenges the trial court’s judgment regarding the original plaintiff’s claim
against the original defendant. Instead, the defendant argues that the trial court
lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over the intervenor’s claims. We agree. We
additionally conclude that the trial court lacked subject-m

HJ Grathol (“Grathol”) appeals the Kootenai County district court’s judgment awarding Grathol $675,000 in just compensation from the Idaho Transportation Department (“ITD”). This eminent domain case arose when ITD acted to condemn 16.314 acres to improve U.S. Highway 95 (“U.S. 95”). Those 16.314 acres were part of 56.8 acres that Grathol owned in Athol, Idaho.
2
After a bench

Appellant Eddie Lerma, challenges a jury verdict and subsequent judgment holding him liable to Appellee Border Demolition & Environmental, Inc. (“Border Demolition”) for breach of an oral demolition contract and attorneys’ fees. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
Factual History
On May 28, 2008, the City of El Paso condemned a house and detached garage located at 7429 Rose Lane Circle in El P

The petitioner, John Doe, appeals an order of the Superior Court (McNamara, J.) granting summary judgment for the respondent, the State of New Hampshire, on the petitioner’s declaratory judgment action, which sought a ruling that RSA chapter 651-B is unconstitutional, as applied to him, because it violates the prohibition against retrospective laws and the Due Process Clause of the New Hampshire

We must decide whether the city of Bothell assumed
responsibility for maintaining a drainage pipe installed in Crystal Ridge, a residential
subdivision in Snohomish County. Crystal Ridge was developed from two residential
plats that Snohomish County approved in 1987. The area became incorporated into
the city of Bothell (City) in 1992. One of the plats contained a drainage easement

This matter comes to us on a judgment of dismissal of a complaint for declaratory and other relief, brought by plaintiff and appellant Linda Vista Village San Diego Homeowners Association, Inc. (Appellant). Its members are sublessees of mobilehome park lots on a real property site (the park site) that is subject to a 1979 master lease between the landowner defendant and respondent, the City of San

Appellees Eugene Taylor and Charles Fenner brought suit against Highland Haven
and Burnet County seeking damages for inverse condemnation caused by the County’s construction
of a bridge upgradient from their properties. The City and County filed pleas to the jurisdiction,
asserting that their governmental immunity barred suit because Taylor and Fenner’s pleadings
did not suppor

Appellees Eugene Taylor and Charles Fenner brought suit against Highland Haven
and Burnet County seeking damages for inverse condemnation caused by the County’s construction
of a bridge upgradient from their properties. The City and County filed pleas to the jurisdiction,
asserting that their governmental immunity barred suit because Taylor and Fenner’s pleadings
did not suppor

Tulsa, OK - Civil trial lawyer Kent Morlan represented the State of Oklahoma on an eminent domain theory seeking to acquire by condemnation certain rights, title and interest in real property owned by Craig Heidinger.

Tulsa, OK - Civil trial lawyer Kent Morlan represented the State of Oklahoma in this action to acquire certain rights title and interest in certain real property by eminent domain for public purposes by condemnation.

The City elected to take property belonging to the Whittingtons. As part of the process,
the City paid a deposit into the registry of the trial court, and the deposit was later placed in an
investment account with the permission of the parties. After the supreme court determined that the
condemnation of the property was proper, the district court awarded the investment income to the

Tulsa County, OK - The State of Oklahoma sued Roger Hardesty and others on eminent domain theories seeking to acquire by condemnation certain rights, title and interests in real property owned by Mr. Hardesty and others for public use.

Court docket entries:

03-18-1985 TEXT

** PETITION - NO CHARGE [43.50]

03-18-1985 TEXT

** SUMMONS ISSUED (4 C

Appellees Joe Murphy, Yoram Ben-Amram, and Galtex Development, LLC1 sued the City of Galveston, claiming that the City unconstitutionally took their property without just compensation through inverse condemnation. The City filed a plea to the jurisdiction, which the trial court denied. The City timely filed this
1 We refer to the appellees collectively as the “Property Owners.”
interlo

¶1 Appellant Raintree Estates I, Inc., d/b/a Silver Ridge Townhomes, a/k/a Raintree Estates I Condominiums Homeowners Association (The Association) seeks review of the trial court's order directing the distribution of proceeds of a Commissioners Report to individual condominium unit owners in a condemnation action filed by Plaintiff City of Tulsa (The City). Appellant also appeals a subsequent or

Sioux Falls, SD - Five South Dakota families sued the State of South Dakota on inverse condemnation theories claiming that their properties were damaged as a direct result in adequate drainage underneath Highway 11 in Shindler, South Dakota. They claimed that their properties flooded in 2010 as a result of inadequate drainage under the state highway.

¶1 On certiorari, petitioner Andrew LeBeau asks us to
consider whether the court of appeals erred in affirming the district
court’s imposition of a sentence of life without the possibility of
parole following Mr. LeBeau’s conviction for aggravated kidnapping
pursuant to Utah Code section 76-5-302. Mr. LeBeau’s conviction
stems from a domestic dispute triggered by Mr. LeB