San Antonio, Texas pro se Plaintiff sued on a job discrimination theory.

42 U.S. Code § 2000e, also known as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, is a federal law that prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. It applies to employers, employment agencies, and labor organizations.

Here's a breakdown of key aspects:
More...   $0 (08-04-2025 - TX)

Rochester, Minnesota criminal defendant lawyer represented the Defendant charged with unlawful possession of a firearm.


* * *

Legal issue Was the evidence sufficient to support a conviction for constructive possession of a firearm and ammunition?

CRIMINAL LAW. UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF A FIREARM. The case addresses whether the evidence was sufficient to prove beyond a... More...   $0 (07-21-2025 - MN)

Tallahassee, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiring to possess with intent to distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine and possession with intent to distribute 5 and 50 grams of methamphetamine.
Marianna Man Receives 10 Years In Prison For Dea... More...   $0 (07-15-2025 - FL)

Herman, Missouri family law lawyers represented the parties in a child custody dispute.

Mother challenged the July 2024 judgment of paternity, custody, and child support in which the trial court found the parenting plan proposed by E.W.S. (Father) to be in the best interests of the parties' five-year-old child, S.P.S. That plan gave the parties joint legal custody, approximately equal cus... More...   $0 (07-14-2025 - MO)

Baltimore, Maryland personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a 42 U.S.C. 1983 civil rights violation claim.

In the spring of 2021, Plaintiff Kurt Alexander (“Alexander”) worked as a law enforcement officer for Federal Protective Services (“FPS”), an arm of the Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”), and lived in private military housing at Joint Base Andrews in Mar... More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - MD)

Knoxville, Tennessee criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Conspiring To Murder Federal, State, And Local Law Enforcement Officers And Employees
Tennessee Man Sentenced To Life Imprisonment For Conspiring To Murder Federal, State, And Local Law Enforcement Office... More...   $0 (07-02-2025 - TN)

Charleston, South Carolina labor and employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a job discrimination civil rights violation theory.

* * *

42 U.S.C. 2000e-2, part of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, prohibits employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. This includes discrimination in hiring, firing, compensation, and other ... More...   $0 (06-24-2025 - SC)

El Paso, Texas civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an employment discrimination theory.

In 2001, EchoStar Communications Corporation (“EchoStar”) hired
Appellant Jesus Yanez as a customer service representative at its El Paso,
Texas location. As part of his day one onboarding, Yanez allegedly signed an
arbitration agreement purporting to bind Yanez, ... More...   $0 (06-13-2025 - TX)

Anderson, South Carolina insurance lawyer lawyer represented the Plaintiff seeking restoration of long-term disability benefits.

Penland stopped working in August 2015 following complications from colon surgery and various other conditions. He pplied for long-term disability benefits from his employer, and in February 2016, those benefits were approved. Under the terms of his employer’s... More...   $0 (06-13-2025 - SC)

Raleigh, North Carolina criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with drug and firearm felonies.

In early 2021, North Carolina law enforcement began using two confidential informants (“CI-1” and “CI-2,” or collectively, “the CIs”) to investigate suspected methamphetamine dealing. CI-1 alerted law enforcement that someone named Gregg McDuffie, also known as “... More...   $0 (06-13-2025 - NC)

Stilwell, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

VIOLATION OF COMPULSORY EDUCATION ACT, in violation of 70 O.S. 10-105, which provides:

A. It shall be unlawful for a parent, guardian, or other person having custody of a child who is over the age of five (5) years, and under the age of eighteen (18) years, to neglect or refuse to cause or compel... More...   $0 (06-10-2025 - OK)