| Robert Januchowski v. Fay Servicing, L.L.C. |
|
Buffalo, New York, consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act violation claim. |
| Commonwealth of Massachusetts v. Thomas Patak |
|
Boston, Massachusetts, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with smash-and-grab burglaries. |
| United States of America v. Matthew Zook |
|
Sioux Falls, South Dakota criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Attempted Enticement of a Minor. |
| United States of America v. Matthew Zook |
|
Sioux Falls, SD criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Attempted Enticement of a Minor Using the Internet |
| United States of America v. Jason Cory Byroft |
|
Muskogee, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of child pornography. |
| United States of America v. Caleb French |
|
Anchorage, Alaska, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with distribution of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2252(a)(2), which provides: |
| The State of Hawai'i v. Craig Stephen MacDonald |
|
Honolulu, Hawaii, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with a felony. |
| Sarah Genebacher v. Lee Enterprises, Incorporated, d/b/a St. Louis Post Dispatch |
|
St. Louis, Missouri, consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment law violation theory. |
| United States of America v. Juan Espinoza Martinez |
|
Chicago, Illinois criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Soliciting the Murder of Senior Law Enforcement Official. |
| United States of America v. Victor Manuel Castro-Huerta |
|
Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, 597 U.S. 629 (2022), was a United States Supreme Court case related to McGirt v. Oklahoma, decided in 2020. In McGirt, the Supreme Court ruled that the U.S. Congress never properly disestablished the Indian reservations of the Five Civilized Tribes in Oklahoma when granting its statehood, and thus almost half the state was still considered to be Native American land. As $0 (12-31-2022 - OK) |
| Jessica Clippinger v. State Farm Automobile Insurance Company |
|
Memphis, Tennessee, insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory. |
| United States of America v. Sean Shaughnessy |
|
Dallas, Texas, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with two drug-conspiracy counts, one |
| United States of America v .Peter Bardunias |
|
Albany, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with attempting to entice a minor to engage in prohibited sexual activity. |
| United States of America v. Jean Brown |
|
Baltimore, Maryland, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with drug trafficking. |
| Flying T Ranch, Inc. v. Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians, et al. |
|
Under federal common law, Indian tribes may be sued only under two circumstances: when a tribe waives its sovereign immunity or when Congress unequivocally abrogates tribal sovereign immunity. Here, Flying T Ranch (Flying T) filed suit in Snohomish County Superior Court to quiet title to nonreservation land purchased by the Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians (Tribe). Flying T contends it had acquired $0 (10-10-2025 - WA) |
| United States of America v. Peter Bardunias |
|
Albany, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with attempting to entice a minor to engage in prohibited sexual activity. |
| Rohini Meka, et al. v. Hani Haddad, et al. |
|
Springfield, Massachusetts, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs on a medical malpractice claim. |
| United States of America v. Daniel Moreno |
|
Salt Lake City, Utah, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with use of a firearm during a crime of violence. $0 (10-09-2025 - UT) |
| Gwen B. Witherspoon v. Christopher D. Ince, et al. |
|
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, civil litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiff and the Defendants in a declaratory judgment action. |
| State of Oklahoma v. David Michael Lamb |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with assault and battery with a deadly weapon, shooting with intent to kill, and use of a Vehicle in discharge of a weapon. |
| United States of America v. Cristhian Ortega-Lopez |
|
Albuquerque, New Mexico criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with alien in possession of a firearm and ammunition and conspiracy to tamper with evidence. |
| Virgal DRM, LLC v. Ressler Motor Company |
|
Butte, Montana, intellectual property lawyers represented the parties in a trademark infringement dispute. |
| United States of America v. Leonard Polk |
|
Portland, Oregon criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Coercion and Enticement of a Minor. |
| United States of America v. Jonathan Rinderknecht, a.k.a. “Jonathan Rinder,” and “Jon Rinder,” |
|
Los Angeles, California criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with destruction of property by means of fire. |
| The People of the State of California v. Vaagn Galustyan and Armin Martirosya |
|
San Diego, California, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with cheating at poke at casino. |
|
Next Page |