United States of America v. Rafael Avendano Yanez |
Winchester, Tennessee criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with reentry of deported alien in violation of 8 U.S.C. 1326, which provides: |
United States of America v. Peggy Elaine Smith |
Winchester, Tennessee criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with trafficking in counterfeit devices in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1029, which provides: |
United States of America v. Albert Morrison |
Detroit, Michigan criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with accepting bribes from a local contractor and tax evasion. |
Climet Martin and Tawanna Adkins v. City of Tulsa |
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a Governmental Tort Claim Act theory claiming to have been injured and/or damaged as a result of being assaulted and battered by a city employee. |
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Roosters Cocktails, Inc. |
Tulsa, Oklahoma intellectual property lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory under 17 U.S.C. 101. |
Wen Cheng v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service |
Baltimore, Maryland immigration lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an administrative law theory. |
United States of America v. Marilyn Mosby |
Baltimore, Maryland criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with two counts of perjury. |
Khurrum N. Khan v. United States Citizenship and Immigraiton Service |
Trenton, New Jersey immigration lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an administrative procedure act relief theory.... More... $0 (11-13-2023 - NJ) |
Graham Chase Robinson v. Robert De Niro, et al. |
New York City, New York employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants Fair Labor Standards Act violations Theories. |
Michael Aletum v. Mashpoint, L.L.C. |
Newark, New Jersey civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an Americans with Disabilities Act violation theory under 42 U.S.C. 12101, et seq.... More... $0 (11-09-2023 - NJ) |
Annie McAdams v. Progress Software Corporation |
Boston, Massachusetts civil litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a Federal Trade Commission Act under 15 U.S.C. 45 for damages from a Customer Data Security Breach.... More... $1 (11-09-2023 - MA) |
John Thomas v. OS Restaurant Services, LLC, et al. |
Boston, Massachusetts employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a Fair Labor Standards Act 15 U.S.C. 5(a) violations.... More... $1 (11-09-2023 - MA) |
Barbara Delo v. Paul Taylor Dance Foundation, Inc. |
New York, New York employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on Fair Labor Standards Act prohibited act violations. |
Janelys Herndandez v. Alexia Admor French Designer Group, Ltd. |
New York, New York civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a 42:12132 Americans with Disabilities Act - Discrimination theory. |
Angela Wahab v. Walking Depot Corporation |
New York, New York civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant who sued the Plaintiff on a 42:12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 violation theory. |
Luis Mercedes v. Suppz, Inc. |
New York, New York civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an Americans with Disabilities Act violation theory. |
Lucia Dor-Brutus v. FMS New York Services, LLC, d/b/a Fresenius Kidney Care |
White Plaintiffs, New York civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination theory. |
United States of America v. Marco Armando Vera Gomez |
San Diego, California criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with being illegally in the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. 1326(a)(b), which provides: |
Ailyn Alonso v. Midland Credit Management, Inc. |
San Diego, California consumer credit lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Fair Debt Collection Act violation theory. |
United States of America v. Daniel Bahena Ortiz |
Phoenix, Arizona criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud in violation 18 U.S.C. 371, which provides: |
Laurie Bolos v. Grand Wailea A Waldorf Astoria Resort, et al. |
Honolulu, Hawaii employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on Fair Labor Standards Act violation theories. |
Rosalind I. Felipe v. State Farm |
Honolulu, Hawaii insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who used the Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory. |
Maddison Becknell v. Rondey Horton and the City of Tulsa |
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the City of Tulsa on an Governmental Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory under 51 O.S. 151, et seq. |
Mielissa Mulich v. Dolgencorp. LLC |
Springfield, Missouri civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a American with Disabilities Act violation theory under 42 U.S.C. 12101. |
United States of America v. Joshua Eugene Rickey |
St. Louis, Missouri criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with making and possessing illegal pipe bombs. |
Next Page |