Orlando, Florida personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 use of unreasonable force in violation of the Fourth Amendment theory.

On the evening of April 26, 2016, Heid, his wife, and their
roommate were drinking alcohol at their home. Heid’s daughter
and stepson were also at the home. Around 9:00 PM, Heid and his
wife go

Cordell, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Lewd or Indecent Acts to a Child Under Sixteen, in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2018, § 1123.

2023 OK CR 1, 526 P.3d 46:

¶4 The challenged evidence here met all of the factors required for admissibility under 12 O.S.2011, § 2414. In Horn v. State, 2009 OK CR 7, ¶ 40, 204 P.3d 777, 786, we required

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with f Rape in the First Degree in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2011, § 1114(A).

2022 OK CR 25, 519 P.3rd 526:

¶3 On the evening of October 20, 2017, M.P. went to Appellant's apartment and joined Appellant and other friends playing games and drinking. A.L, Appellant's girlfriend who also lived in the

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Sexual Abuse of a Child Under 12 (Count 1),1 in violation of 10 O.S.Supp.2002, § 7115.

2019 OK CR 23, 450 P.3d 969:

3 Proposition I: Brewer asserts the trial court erred in admitting the propensity testimony of A.K., J.H., L.R.N., and P.E.S. Brewer specifically contends the trial court abused its dis

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendant charged with First Degree Rape by Narcotic or Anesthetic Agent, in violation of 21 O.S.2011, § 1111(A)(4).

2016 OK CR 18, 387 P.3d 922:

¶5 Appellant fails to show actual error, let alone plain error, from the admission of the propensity evidence in this case. Malone v. State, 2013 OK CR 1, ¶ 41, 293 P.3d 198, 2

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charnged wiht Count I, Rape in the First Degree in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2008, § 1114; Count II, Forcible Oral Sodomy in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2007, § 886; and Count III, Assault and Battery by Means Likely to Cause Death in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2007, § 652, .

2010 OK CR 28, 250 P.3d 901:

¶6

Raleigh, North Carolina criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with being a felon in possession of a firearm.

Federal Charges Brought After Man Fired at Nash County Deputy

Wilmington, Delaware criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with coercion and enticement of a minor.
Delaware Man Sentenced To 240 Months For Coercing 11-Year-Old New Jersey Resident To Travel To Delaware For Sexual Activity

Miami, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with International Fraud Scheme
Nigerian National Pleads Guilty to International Fraud Scheme that Defrauded Elderly U.S. Victims

Spokane, Washington criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with Assault Resulting in Substantial Bodily Injury to a Spouse, Intimate Partner, or Dating Partner

Inchelium Man Sentenced to 57 Months in Prison for Beating and Strangling His Intimate Partner

Tucson, Arizona criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with Attempted Carjacking, Use and Discharge of a Firearm During and In Relation to a Crime of Violence

Mexican National Charged After Killing of Attempted Carjacking Victim in Tucson, Arizona

Indianapolis, Indiana criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with fraud.

On January 31, 2023, a jury convicted Brian Fenner and Dennis Birkley of seventeen counts, all stemming from one overarching fraud.1 Like many fraud schemes, underlying the intricate machinations of this ploy is clear-cut malfeasance.

Under Indiana’s mechanic’s lien statute, an indiv

Fargo criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with Over $14.6 Billion in Alleged Fraud

National Health Care Fraud Takedown Results in 324 Defendants Charged in Connection with Over $14.6 Billion in Alleged Fraud

New York City, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with racketeering, wire fraud, money laundering, and Truth-In-Lending Act (“TILA”) offenses.

* * *

Legal issue Can the government obtain clear title to forfeited substitute assets following a criminal conviction and resolution of all third-party claims?
Headnote

CRIMINAL LAW. FORFE

Harrrisburg, Virginia criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with abduction, felony eluding, and driving after being declared a habitual offender.

On the evening of November 27, 2018, Officer Brandon Mawyer was patrolling in his police cruiser in the City of Waynesboro when he received a "be on the lookout" alert for a "possibly-abducted female ... named Morgan Hammer."

Morristown, Tennessee criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant seeking review of the revocation of his pretrial bail.

On May 19, 2025, the Defendant appeared for a plea submission hearing during which it became apparent that the restitution amount remained unresolved.[2] The trial court reset the matter for further hearing on the following day. At the May 20, 2025 hearing, the De

Buffalo, New York disability lawyers represented the Petitioner seeking review of the denial of her application for Social Security: DIWC/DIWW disability by HHS.

In Social Security law, DIWC (Disabled Individual, Worker or Child) refers to disability claims under Title II of the Social Security Act, specifically for disabled workers and eligible children. DIWW (Disabled Widow/Widower Bene

Buffalo, New York disability lawyer represented the Petitioner seeking review of the denial by HHS of her application for Social Security: DIWC/DIWW benefits.

* * *

In Social Security law, DIWC (Disabled Individual, Worker or Child) refers to disability claims under Title II of the Social Security Act, specifically for disabled workers and eligible children. DIWW (Disabled Widow/

Tyler, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with illegally reentering the United States after previously being deported.
Mexican national federally indicted in the Eastern District of Texas

Tyler, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with illegally reentering the United States after previously being removed.
Twice-deported Mexican national federally indicted in the Eastern District of Texas

Tyler, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with illegally reentering the United States after previously being deported and being an illegal alien in possession of a firearm.
Armed Mexican national federally indicted in the Eastern District of Texas

Dallas, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with conspiring to possess with intent to distribute 40 grams or more of fentanyl.
Two Dallas Residents Sentenced to 188 Months in Federal Prison for Conspiring to Distribute Over $600,000 Worth of Fentanyl

Kansas City, Kansas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

18:111(a)(1), 111(b) - Forcible Assault of a Federal Officer and 18:2 - Aiding and abetting. Forfeiture allegations.

8:924(c)(1)(A)(iii) - Use of a Firearm in Furtherance of a Crime of Violence and 18:2 - Aiding and abetting. Forfeiture allegations.

On August 3, 2020, Kansas City Kansas

Wilmington, North Carolina criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with
Clayton Man with Gun Sentenced to Over Five Years in Prison for COVID-19 Fraud

Washington, D.C. criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with being a felon in possession of a loaded Glock 23 equipped with a machine gun conversion device+
Possession of Machine Gun While on Probation for Two Armed Robberies Nets Felon 57 Months in Prison