Limitation of Action Law
 
State of Nevada v. Tiktok, Inc., et al.

Las Vegas, Nevada commercial litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiffs seeking a writ of prohibition or, alternatively, mandamus challenging a district court order denying a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim in a consumer protection action.

The State of Nevada filed a complaint against petitioners TikTok, Inc., and its related entiti

More...   $0 (11-07-2025 - NV)

Russell Jones v. City of Tempe, et al.

Phoenix, Arizona civil litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff seeking reimbursement for attorney fees expended in an effort to obtain body-camera footage of his arrest.

Jones was arrested by the Tempe Police Department in October 2023. In December, Jones submitted a public records request for, among other things, the arresting officers' body-worn camera ("BWC") footage. Tempe filed c

More...   $0 (11-06-2025 - AZ)

Tom Koch v. UNUM Group, et al.

Las Vegas, Nevada criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3.

A claim of retaliation under Title VII is governed by the three-step
burden-shifting framework under McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S.
792, 802–05 (1973). First, the plaintiff must establish a prima facie c

More...   $0 (11-07-2025 - NV)

United States of America v. Bryant James Ross

Pierre, South Dakota, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with assault and battery.

Assault is an act that causes someone to fear imminent physical harm, while battery is the physical act of applying force to another person. The key difference is that battery requires physical contact, which can be offensive or harmful, whereas assault does not, according to some jur

More...   $0 (11-07-2025 - SD)

State of Nebraska v. Ivell M. Hagens

Omaha, Nebraska, first degree sexual assault of a child, a Class IB felony 1; incest
with a person under age 18, a Class IIA felony 2; and tampering with physical evidence.

1. Convictions: Appeal and Error. In an appeal of a criminal convic -
tion, an appellate court reviews the evidence in a light most favorable
to the prosecution.

2. Convictions: Evidence: Appeal an

More...   $0 (11-07-2025 - NE)

United States of America v. James L. Hattten, II

Omaha, Nebraska, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with sex trafficking a minor in violation of 18 U.S. 1591.

Federal and state laws treat
trafficking a minor as a severe felony, defining a minor as anyone under the age of 18. A key component of these laws is that a minor cannot legally consent to commercial sex acts or forced labor, meaning prosecutors do not

More...   $0 (11-07-2025 - NE)

State of Missouri v. Misael Covarrubias

Columbia, Missouri, criminal defense lawyer represent the Defendant charged with with three counts of first-degree assault, three counts of armed criminal action and unlawful use of a weapon causing death or injury.

Misael Covarrubias is accused of shooting and killing Stephens College student Aiyanna Williams died at University Hospital after being shot on East Broadway in downtown Colu

More...   $0 (11-07-2025 - MO)

United States of America v. Dartez Omar Faulk and Rosalind Carol Comfort

Raleigh, North Carolina criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Trafficking Young Woman .

following a four-day trial, a federal jury in Raleigh convicted Dartez Omar Faulk and Rosalind Carol Comfort of three counts of sex trafficking following a four day trial.

“These depraved reprobates preyed on vulnerable young women to make money from their sufferi

More...   $0 (09-26-2025 - NC)

Texas Department of Family and Protective Services v, D.V.

Austin, Texas, family law lawyer represent Defendant in a parental termination action.

As future-Chief Justice Pope explained for the Court nearly half a century ago, for example, "[a]ctions which break the ties between a parent and child can never be justified without the most solid and substantial reasons," and so "in an action which permanently sunders those ties," the "proceedings [sh

More...   $0 (11-03-2025 - TX)

Brian Hoffard and Emmalyn Hoffard v. Marc Jones Construction, LLC d/b/a Sunpro Solar, aka Adt Solar, LLC

Newports News, Virginia civil litigation lawyers represented the parties in a breach of contract action involving an arbitration agreement in a contract.

More...   $0 (11-03-2025 - va)

Alicia Rowe v. State Mutual Insurance Company

Belfast, Maine insurance lawyer represented the Plaintiff who brought a reach-and-apply action that Rowe brought pursuant to 24-A M.R.S. § 2904 (2019).[1] See Ashe v. Enter. Rent-A-Car, 2003 ME 147, ¶ 14, 838 A.2d 1157 ("The reach and apply statute . . . enables a judgment creditor to have insurance money applied to the satisfaction of [a] judgment by bringing an action against the judgment debt

More...   $0 (09-30-2025 - ME)

Jane Doe v. Pediatric Dental Group, LLC, et al.

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs class action wrongful disclosure of personal identity formation.

The Plaintiff claimed that the Defendants engaged in the improper practice of disclosing the confidential Peranally Identifying information and/or Protect Health Information of Plaintiff and the proposed class.

More...   $0 (10-20-2025 - OK)

Moore Urban Renewal Authority v. Milton Cantrell, et al.

Norman, Oklahoma condemnation action.

The Moore Urban Renewal Authority brought an eminent domain action to acquire right, title and interest in real property owned by the Defendants for public used.

More...   $0 (10-06-2025 - OK)

Adair County Board of County Commissioners v. Paul David Rutherford, et al.

Stilwell, Oklahoma, condemnation lawyers represented the Defendants in an eminent domain action.

Adair County, Oklahoma filed a condemnation action seeking to acquire certain rights, title and interests in real property owned by the Defendants for public use.

The Commissioners appointed by the Court awarded the Defendants $3,750.

The Defendants demanded a jury trial on t

More...   $36000 (10-20-2025 - OK)

Veronica SanMiguel v. Meryl Y. Grimaldi, & c., et al.

Bronx, New York, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who used on a medical malpractice theory.

Plaintiff Veronica SanMiguel was admitted to defendant St. Barnabas Hospital (St. Barnabas) on July 1, 2012, after she did not go into labor by her due date. She came under the care of defendant Dr. Meryl Y. Grimaldi who, along with St. Barnabas's nursing staff, induced labor. On t

More...   $0 (10-30-2025 - NY)

Dr. Rachel Tudor v. Ezra Young and Brittany Stewart

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on an interpleader theory.

Rachel Tudor, was the prevailing party in a previous employment
dispute that we remanded for calculation of attorney fees owed her. Tudor v. Se.
Okla. State Univ., 13 F.4th 1019, 1049 (10th Cir. 2021). On remand she settled for
$1,725,000 on all claims,

More...   $0 (10-29-2025 - OK)

Mr Michael Devin Floyd v. Santa Clara Department of Corrections, et al.

San Francisco, California civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who claimed that his rights were violated by the Defendants.

Late in the evening on August 18, 2021, Plaintiff-Appellant Michael Devin
Floyd was arrested and brought to the Santa Clara Main Jail for booking. Four hours
later, Floyd was transferred to the nearby Elmwood Correctional Facility. There,
correct

More...   $0 (10-28-2025 - CA)

Denali Summit, LLC v. Union Electric Company, d/b/a Ameren Missouri

Jefferson City, Missouri, commercial civil litigation lawyers represented the parties in an easement dispute.

In 1926, the FERC issued a license to Walter Cravens to construct a dam across
Missouri’s Osage River and to generate hydroelectric power from the resulting
reservoir. Ameren acquired rights to the Osage Project in 1929, while the dam
remained under construction. As

More...   $0 (10-27-2025 - MO)

State of Oklahoma v. E.E.

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

MALICIOUS INJURY TO PROPERTY - 1000 OR MORE

A. Every person who maliciously injures, defaces or destroys any real or personal property not his or her own, in cases other than such as are specified in Section 1761 et seq. of this title, is guilty of:

1. A misdemeanor, if the damage, defacemen

More...   $0 (10-23-2025 - OK)

Amos C. Johnson, M.D., etc. v. Rita Elizabeth Johnson, etc.

Detroit, Michigan, civil litigation lawyers represented the the parties in interpretation of a trust.

In 2000, Amos G. Johnson and his wife, Marjorie Johnson, established the Johnson
Family Trust, naming their son, Appellant Amos C. Johnson, M.D., as the first successor trustee.
Amos G. Johnson died in 2007, and Marjorie Johnson died in 2020. This case involves the
proceedings

More...   $0 (10-24-2025 - MI)

United States of America v. Lionell Coleman

Cincinnati, Ohio, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to distribute drugs.

Google A.I.:

A conspiracy is a secret plan by two or more people to do something unlawful or harmful. In a legal context, it is an agreement between two or more people to commit a crime, which often requires an overt act to further the agreement. The term "conspiracy t

More...   $0 (10-24-2025 - OH)

Charles Bozzo v. Jennifer Nanasy, et al.

Grand Rapids, Michigan, employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a civil rights violation theory under 42 U.S.C. 1983.

rles Bozzo was fired from his job as a correctional officer with the Michigan Department of Corrections after a coworker accused him of making harassing comments. Years later, he sued two MDOC employees under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, claiming that
the pai

More...   $0 (10-24-2025 - MI)

In re the Marriage of: SOSA VILLANUEVA, DARWIN ALONSO and LAINEZ ZAVALA, CLARISA LORENA

Tulsa, Oklahoma, family law lawyers represented the parties in a divorce action

More...   $0 (10-21-2025 - OK)

Robert Januchowski v. Fay Servicing, L.L.C.

Buffalo, New York, consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act violation claim.

Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) violations include abusive, deceptive, and unfair debt collection tactics such as harassment, repeated calls, and threats of illegal action. Other violations include making false statements about the debt's amount or legal sta

More...   $1 (10-21-2025 - NY)

Joseph Santarlas v. Bowtech, Inc., et al.

Salt Lake City, Utah, civil and commercial litigation lawyers represented the parties in an anti-trust case.

Bowtech manufactures and sells compound bows for hunting and target archery.

Bowtech is named as a defendant in a class-action lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, which alleges the company and other archery industry manufacturers and retaile

More...   $0 (10-20-2025 - UT)

Next Page

Find a Lawyer
Find a Case
AK Morlan
Kent Morlan, Esq.
Editor & Publisher