| State of Nevada v. Tiktok, Inc., et al. |
|
Las Vegas, Nevada commercial litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiffs seeking a writ of prohibition or, alternatively, mandamus challenging a district court order denying a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim in a consumer protection action. |
| Russell Jones v. City of Tempe, et al. |
|
Phoenix, Arizona civil litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff seeking reimbursement for attorney fees expended in an effort to obtain body-camera footage of his arrest. |
| Tom Koch v. UNUM Group, et al. |
|
Las Vegas, Nevada criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-3. |
| United States of America v. Bryant James Ross |
|
Pierre, South Dakota, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with assault and battery. |
| State of Nebraska v. Ivell M. Hagens |
|
Omaha, Nebraska, first degree sexual assault of a child, a Class IB felony 1; incest |
| United States of America v. James L. Hattten, II |
|
Omaha, Nebraska, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with sex trafficking a minor in violation of 18 U.S. 1591. |
| State of Missouri v. Misael Covarrubias |
|
Columbia, Missouri, criminal defense lawyer represent the Defendant charged with with three counts of first-degree assault, three counts of armed criminal action and unlawful use of a weapon causing death or injury. |
| United States of America v. Dartez Omar Faulk and Rosalind Carol Comfort |
|
Raleigh, North Carolina criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Trafficking Young Woman . |
| Texas Department of Family and Protective Services v, D.V. |
|
Austin, Texas, family law lawyer represent Defendant in a parental termination action. |
| Brian Hoffard and Emmalyn Hoffard v. Marc Jones Construction, LLC d/b/a Sunpro Solar, aka Adt Solar, LLC |
|
Newports News, Virginia civil litigation lawyers represented the parties in a breach of contract action involving an arbitration agreement in a contract. $0 (11-03-2025 - va) |
| Alicia Rowe v. State Mutual Insurance Company |
|
Belfast, Maine insurance lawyer represented the Plaintiff who brought a reach-and-apply action that Rowe brought pursuant to 24-A M.R.S. § 2904 (2019).[1] See Ashe v. Enter. Rent-A-Car, 2003 ME 147, ¶ 14, 838 A.2d 1157 ("The reach and apply statute . . . enables a judgment creditor to have insurance money applied to the satisfaction of [a] judgment by bringing an action against the judgment debt $0 (09-30-2025 - ME) |
| Jane Doe v. Pediatric Dental Group, LLC, et al. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs class action wrongful disclosure of personal identity formation. |
| Moore Urban Renewal Authority v. Milton Cantrell, et al. |
|
Norman, Oklahoma condemnation action. |
| Adair County Board of County Commissioners v. Paul David Rutherford, et al. |
|
Stilwell, Oklahoma, condemnation lawyers represented the Defendants in an eminent domain action. |
| Veronica SanMiguel v. Meryl Y. Grimaldi, & c., et al. |
|
Bronx, New York, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who used on a medical malpractice theory. |
| Dr. Rachel Tudor v. Ezra Young and Brittany Stewart |
|
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on an interpleader theory. |
| Mr Michael Devin Floyd v. Santa Clara Department of Corrections, et al. |
|
San Francisco, California civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who claimed that his rights were violated by the Defendants. |
| Denali Summit, LLC v. Union Electric Company, d/b/a Ameren Missouri |
|
Jefferson City, Missouri, commercial civil litigation lawyers represented the parties in an easement dispute. |
| State of Oklahoma v. E.E. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: |
| Amos C. Johnson, M.D., etc. v. Rita Elizabeth Johnson, etc. |
|
Detroit, Michigan, civil litigation lawyers represented the the parties in interpretation of a trust. |
| United States of America v. Lionell Coleman |
|
Cincinnati, Ohio, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to distribute drugs. |
| Charles Bozzo v. Jennifer Nanasy, et al. |
|
Grand Rapids, Michigan, employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a civil rights violation theory under 42 U.S.C. 1983. |
| In re the Marriage of: SOSA VILLANUEVA, DARWIN ALONSO and LAINEZ ZAVALA, CLARISA LORENA |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, family law lawyers represented the parties in a divorce action $0 (10-21-2025 - OK) |
| Robert Januchowski v. Fay Servicing, L.L.C. |
|
Buffalo, New York, consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a Fair Debt Collection Practices Act violation claim. |
| Joseph Santarlas v. Bowtech, Inc., et al. |
|
Salt Lake City, Utah, civil and commercial litigation lawyers represented the parties in an anti-trust case. |
|
Next Page |