Mohammad Arif Hossian v. United States of America |
Washington, DC immigration lawyer represented the Plaintiff seeking a write of mandamus to force the adjudicate a visa application. |
Juan Carlos Moscoso Martinez v. CC&G Landscaping and Stone Works, L.L.C. |
Greenbelt, Maryland employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a abor: Fair Standards Act violation theory. |
Abdulkadir Mohamed v. George Washington University |
Washington, DC civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Family and Medical Leave Act violation theory. |
United States of America v. Mark Wright |
Salt Lake City, Utah criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with causing the introduction of misbranded and adulterated devices into interstate commerce. |
T.H. v. Social Security Administration |
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma social security disability lawyer represented the Plaintiff seeking review of the denial of her application for social security disability benefits by HHS. |
E.J.R. v. Social Security Administration |
Muskogee, Oklahoma social security disability lawyer represented the Plaintiff seeking review of the denial of her application for benefits by HHS. |
Bettina B. Beaver v. Denver Amazon |
Tulsa, Oklahoma pro se Plaintiff without a lawyer representing her sued the Defendant on a civil rights violation theory. |
Chiwana Crandell v. Kevin Ross, et al. |
Rochester, New York civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a prisoner civil rights violation theory undeer 42 U.S.C. 1983. |
Dennis Scott v. Paychex Insurance Agency, Inc. |
Fort Fauderdale, Florida insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant |
United States of America v. Neil Cole |
New York City, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with participating in a scheme to fraudulently inflate Iconix’s revenue and earnings per share, making false filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and misleading the conduct of audits. |
Lindsey Lehr v. Cryo-Cell International, Inc. |
West Palm Beach, Florida employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a breach of contract theory. |
Lawrence Feltzin v. Logra Management, Inc. |
West Palm Beach, Florida civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an Americans with Disabilities Act under 42 U.S.C. 12182, which provides: |
Marija Knezevic v. United States of America |
West Palm Beach, Florida immigration lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant seeking a writ of mandamus. |
Hugo Lucas Campbell Ortega, et al. v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Services |
Lincoln, Nebraska immigration lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant seeking review of an administrative order under 05 U.S.C. 551, which provides: |
United States of America v. Solis Lopez-Vasquez |
Del Rio, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with illeglly re-entering the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. 1326B2, which provides: |
United States of America v. Angelica Ramirez |
Del Rio, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to transport illegal aliens in violation of 8 U.S.C. 1324(a)(1)(A)(v)(I) & (B)(i). |
Mingchang Chung v. Trans Union, LLC |
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania consumer credit lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Fair Credit Reporting Act violation theory. |
David Grasinger v. Caterpillar, Inc. |
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory. |
Alex N. Perhosky v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory. |
Cynthia Gillum and George Gillum v. American Economy Insurance Company |
Houston, Texas insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory. |
Eric Walton v. Koki Holdings Co., Ltd. |
Galveston, Texas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a product liability theory. |
United States of America v. Genomic Health, Inc. |
Brooklyn, New York civil litigation lawyers represented Defendant accused of violating the False Claims ACtby engaging in a nationwide scheme to improperly bill Medicare for certain laboratory tests used to diagnose and treat cancer patients. GHI is a wholly owned subsidiary of Exact Sciences Corporation, which acquired GHI in November 2019. |
Dr. Vishal Saxena v. University of Massachusetts Medical School |
Worcester, Massachusetts civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on an Americans With Disability Act violation theory. |
Lt. Col. (Ret) Joe A. Putnam v. The United States Army Review Board Agency |
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a civil rights violation theory under 42 U.S.C. 1983. |
L.A.R. v. Social Security administration |
Tulsa, Oklahoma social security disability lawyer represented the Plaintiff seeking review of the denial of her application for SSID Tit. XVI under 42 U.S.C. 405(g). |
Next Page |