Jacob Oliver v. Prime Insurance Company |
This is an appeal from the trial court‟s dismissal of plaintiff‟s lawsuit based on a finding of an enforceable forum-selection clause. Appellant argues that the trial court erred in dismissing his claims against Xinsurance and Evolution Insurance Brokers (“EIB”) and in denying his motion to modify the order of dismissal. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Ryan Coleman v. City of Mesa |
Phoenix, Arizona civil litigation lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued the City of Phoenix on a planning and zoning theory. |
John P. Burnham v. California Public Employees Retirement System |
This case is about the procedures two individuals must follow to become domestic partners under California law. |
Kay Davidson v. McLennan County Appraisal District |
Kay Davidson, Richard Martin, and Michael Jones (the Retirees) had retired from employment with the McLennan County Appraisal District (MCAD). Since their retirement, MCAD had allowed them to participate in health insurance coverage through MCAD by timely paying their own premiums. They found out in 2010 that they would no longer be allowed to participate in MCAD’s health insurance program. |
Woody K. Lesikar v. Carolyn Ann Lesiker Moon |
In this appeal, we consider challenges to the trial court’s award of attorney’s fees on remand in a dispute between siblings related to a family trust and their deceased father’s estate. We affirm the trial court’s judgment. |
Aimee Delyn Halleman v. Edward Charles Halleman |
In five issues, Appellant Aimee Delyn Halleman appeals from the divorce decree dissolving her marriage to Appellee Edward Charles Halleman and from an order awarding Edward attorney’s fees pending appeal. We will affirm. |
Todd C. Brennan v. City of Willow Park Texas |
On June 21, 2012, this court issued an opinion reversing the trial court’s judgment and remanding Appellants’ claims for declaratory judgment, for injunctive relief, and for a writ of mandamus asserted against all Appellees, to the trial court for further proceedings. Appellee City of Aledo filed a motion for rehearing and motion for en banc reconsideration. After due consideration, we deny ... More... $0 (08-16-2012 - TX) |
The City of Caldwell, Texas v. Paul Lilly |
Appellant, the City of Caldwell (the “City”), complains about the trial court’s denial of its plea to the jurisdiction in favor of appellee, Paul Lilly. In two issues, the City contends that the trial court erred in denying the plea to the jurisdiction because Chapter 101 of the Texas Labor Code does not waive governmental immunity and does not apply to public employees, and because Lilly’... More... $0 (08-08-2012 - TX) |
Matinee Media Corp. v. Eugenio Falcon |
Matinee Media Corp., Magnolia Radio Corp., Rick Deitrick, and Greg Shapiro appeal the trial court’s order granting injunctive relief, asserting: (1) the trial court abused its discretion because no evidence was presented in support of the injunctive relief granted; (2) the order was signed after the trial court’s plenary power had expired; (3) the order deprived the appellants of due process o... More... $0 (08-03-2012 - TX) |
Jeffrey Willemsen v. Ivacare Corporation |
2 Defendant CTE Tech Corp. is a Taiwanese corporation that manufactures |
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company v. Ronald K. Oney |
Appellee, Ronald K. Oney, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Daniel D. Oney, brought a claim under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (“FELA”) against The Kansas City Southern Railway Company (“KCSR”). KCSR filed a motion to dismiss based on appellee’s failure to serve medical reports under Chapter 90 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code.1 The multidistrict ... More... $0 (07-19-2012 - TX) |
Paul Goldstone v.County of Santa Cruz |
Appellant Paul Goldstone Trust U.T.D. June 27, 2003 (Goldstone) appeals from a judgment entered on its petition for writ of administrative mandamus, in which it sought to overturn the decision of the Santa Cruz County Board of Supervisors denying its application to convert the Alimur Mobilehome Park (Alimur) from rental to condominium ownership. That petition was opposed in the trial court by resp... More... $0 (07-17-2012 - CA) |
Minnie R. Suarez v. Gloria Catillo |
This is an appeal from an enforcement order entered subsequent to the entry of a divorce decree in which the trial court dissolved the marriage of Santiago Suarez and Minnie R. Suarez and made a division of the marital property. When it entered its enforcement order, the trial court ordered Minnie to execute certain documents necessary to effectuate the terms of that decree. She did not do that ... More... $0 (07-12-2012 - TX) |
Wayne Ernest Barker v. Thomas Hutt |
This is an appeal from the trial court’s order declaring Wayne Ernest Barker a vexatious litigant and dismissing his lawsuit after he failed to furnish court-ordered security. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 11.001–.055 (West 2002 & Supp. 2011). In four “assignments” of error, appellant claims that (1) the trial judge erred in failing to recuse himself; therefore, all subsequen... More... $0 (07-12-2012 - TX) |
Misty Lynn LaChance v. George Valverde |
Misty Lynn LaChance pled guilty to driving under the influence of alcohol (DUI), and the Department of Motor Vehicles (the DMV) suspended her driver‟s license for six months, pursuant to Vehicle Code section 13352, subdivision (a)(1). (All further statutory references are to the Vehicle Code, unless otherwise specified.) This suspension was imposed concurrently with a one-year administrative per... More... $0 (07-06-2012 - CA) |
City of San Antonio v. The Rogers Shavano Ranch, Ltd. |
The City of San Antonio appeals the trial court’s denial of its pleas to the jurisdiction in this lawsuit by the Rogers Ranch property owners and developers seeking a declaratory judgment recognizing the development project’s vested rights under Chapter 245 of the Texas Local Government Code. TEX. LOC. GOV’T CODE ANN. §§ 245.001-.007 (West 2005). The issues in this interlocutory appeal are... More... $0 (07-05-2012 - TX) |
Domino's Pizza, LLC v. Christopher Umanzor |
While in the course and scope of his employment as a delivery driver for appellant Domino’s Pizza, L.L.C., (hereinafter, Domino’s, L.L.C.) appellant Hugo Espinosa ran over fifteen‑year‑old appellee Christopher Umanzor, who had been riding his skateboard. Seeking damages for the serious injuries suffered by Christopher, his parents, appellees Manuel Umanzor and Letitia Umanzor... More... $0 (06-15-2012 - TX) |
George T. Paeth v. Worth Township |
George and Margaret Paeth faced many hurdles from Worth Township in trying to renovate their home. Eventually, they took the Township to court, where a jury awarded them $600,000 on First Amendment retaliation and procedural due process claims. The Paeths did not establish a procedural due process violation, because the process they were afforded was constitutionally sufficient. There was, however... More... $0 (06-08-2012 - MI) |
Robert L. Sherman v. State of Illinois |
In 2008, the Illinois General Assembly passed a $5 million appropriation for a grant program to be administered by the Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity (the Department). |
Willie Hooper Grendke v. Robert V. Hooper |
Willie Hooper Gendke appeals from the trial court’s order denying her petition for a bill of review. She raises four issues on appeal. We affirm. |
Chaunte Ott v. City of Milwaukee |
Following his vindication after his wrongful conviction and incarceration for the 1995 murder of Jessica Payne, Chaunte Ott brought a civil rights action against the City of Milwaukee and several police officers. That case is still pending. This appeal was filed when Ott served subpoenas on two non-party state agencies, the Wisconsin Crime Laboratory and the Wisconsin Department of Corrections. Ra... More... $0 (05-29-2012 - WI) |
Chaunte Ott v. City of Milwaukee |
Following his vindication after his wrongful conviction and incarceration for the 1995 murder of Jessica Payne, Chaunte Ott brought a civil rights action against the City of Milwaukee and several police officers. That case is still pending. This appeal was filed when Ott served subpoenas on two non-party state agencies, the Wisconsin Crime Laboratory and the Wisconsin Department of Corrections. Ra... More... $0 (05-29-2012 - WI) |
Dawn McIntyre v. Sonoma Valley Unified School District |
Dawn McIntyre (McIntyre), a former employee of the Sonoma Valley Unified School District (the District), filed a petition for writ of mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1085) to compel the District to reinstate her as a permanent tenured teacher. The primary issue in this case is whether the District had a mandatory duty under the Education Code to classify McIntyre as a “probationary” employee rath... More... $0 (05-22-2012 - CA) |
City of Hamilton, Ohio v. Joseph P. Ebbing |
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Joseph P. Ebbing (Ebbing), appeals pro se from a decision of the Butler County Court of Common Pleas which declared his property a public nuisance and ordered the demolition of buildings located at 419 and 423 Sycamore Street (rear) Hamilton, Ohio. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment as modified. |
Joseph Rothman v. Daniel Rothman |
An alleged incapacitated person (AIP) petitions this court for a writ of mandamus requiring the trial court to dismiss a petition to determine his capacity. He argues the trial court must dismiss the petition because two of the three members of a committee appointed to evaluate him have twice found him capacitated. § 744.331(4), Fla. Stat. (2010). We agree and grant the petition. |
Next Page |