Minneapolis, Minnesota civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on prisoner civil rights violation theory under 42 U.S.C. 1983.

The U.S. Supreme Court has interpreted Section 1983 of the U.S. Code to permit prisoners to sue state correctional officials when the conditions of confinement fail to meet constitutional standards of physical security, adequate medic

Pontiac, Michigan criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendant charged with involuntary manslaughter.

Defendants James and Jennifer Crumbley are the parents of EC, who shot and killed four
fellow students and injured many others at Oxford High School on November 30, 2021. EC pled
guilty to four charges of first-degree murder. In these proceedings, the state has charged
d

Salt Lake City, Utah personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a product liability law theory.

Globus Medical is a leading medical device manufacturer with the goal of improving the quality of life for patients with musculoskeletal disorders. We are inspired by the needs of these patients and by the surgeons and healthcare providers who treat them.

Criminal Defense lawyer represented the Defendant.

n his first proposition, Appellant claims there was insufficient evidence presented at trial to identify him as the shooter. The ultimate question of sufficiency of the evidence should be resolved with deference to the fact finder and in a light most favorable to the State. Dodd v. State, 2004 OK CR 31, ¶ 80, 100 P.3d 1017, 1041; see als

Ottawa, Kansas, criminal defense lawyer presented the Defendant charged with first-degree murder, second-degree murder and felony possession of a firearm.

In 2013, Andrew Stout and two friends, including Steven White, lived at Stout's
house in rural Franklin County. Flack, another friend of Stout's, occasionally spent time
there. Flack brought a shotgun with him everywhere, usua

Muskogee, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act medical malpractice negligence theory.

The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) is federal legislation enacted in 1946 that provides a legal means for compensating individuals who have suffered personal injury, death, or property loss or damage caused by the negligent or wron

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyera represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a medical malpractice negligence theory.

Oklahoma medical malpractice law has the same elements as any other negligence case but with additional requirements for the Plaintiff to prove to recover. The elements are, failure to exercise due care, causation, and damages.

Section 23-61.2 of t

Cheyenne, Wyoming personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the defendant on a medical malpractice wrongful death negligence theory.

"Medical negligence occurs when a doctor or other health care professional fails to provide the expected type and level of care to a patient that a prudent, similarly-skilled, and educated professional would have provided under similar circu

Little Rock, Arkansas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on medical malpractice negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Pulaski County Circuit Court, 60CV-20-00968, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

There is currently no cap on medical malpractice damages in Arkansas (including on compensation for things like pain

Little Rock, Arkansas personal injury medical malpractice lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Torts Claims Act negligence theory.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of their official duties. The United States is liab

Little Rock, Arkansas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on product liability theories.

Wright Medical Group N.V. is a global medical device company committed to delivering innovative, value-added solutions improving quality of life for patients worldwide and is a recognized leader of surgical solutions for the extremities and biologics markets.

Urbana, Illinois personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act medical malpractice wrongful death negligence theory.

The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) is federal legislation enacted in 1946 that provides a legal means for compensating individuals who have suffered personal injury, death, or property loss or damage caused by the negli

East St. Louis, Illinois personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a Federal Tort Claims Act medical malpractice negligence
theory.

Under the FTCA, the federal government acts as a self-insurer, and recognizes liability for the negligent or wrongful acts or omissions of its employees acting within the scope of their official duties. The United States

EAst St. Louis, Illinois personal injury medical malpractice lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a wrongful death negligence theory.

In the state of Illinois, a medical malpractice lawsuit must be carried out within two years from the time patient becomes aware of the misconduct. A comprehensive limit of four years is granted from the date when the malpractice has o

Brooklyn, New York criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with money laundering conspiracy.

Miami, Florida criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with witness tampering and obstructing justice.

Anchorage, Alaska criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with interfering with flight crew on Anchorage flight.

Chicago, Illinois employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Family and Medical Leave Act violation theory.

Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 - Title I: General Requirements for Leave - Establishes certain requirements for unpaid family and medical leave for permanent employees.

(Sec. 101) Makes employees eligible for such leave if they have b

Chicago, Illinois employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Family and Medial Leave Act violation theory.

FMLA is designed to help employees balance their work and family responsibilities by allowing them to take reasonable unpaid leave for certain family and medical reasons. It also seeks to accommodate the legitimate interests of employers and promote

Chicago, Illinois employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Family and Medical Leave Act violation theory.

The FMLA entitles eligible employees of covered employers to take unpaid, job-protected leave for specified family and medical reasons with continuation of group health insurance coverage under the same terms and conditions as if the employee had n

Chicago, Illinois personal injury wrongful death claim lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on medical malpractice negligence theories.

Plaintiff sued individually and as special representative of the Estate of Baby Boy Rodriguez, deceased.

Chicago, Illinois personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act medical malpractice wrongful death medical malpractice negligence theory.

Chicago, Illinois personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court of Will County, Illinois, 23-LA-674 and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Illinois auto negligence law governs how liability and damages are determined in car accidents. Here's a breakdown of its k

Louisville, Kentucky criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged for Conspiring to Sell Hydrocodone and Oxycodone Stolen from Pharmacy.

South Bend, Indiana employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Family and Medical Leave Act violation theory.

The FMLA provides eligible employees of covered employers with job-protected leave for qualifying family and medical reasons and requires continuation of their group health benefits under the same conditions as if they had not taken leave.